A.3. An Actuarial Note on the Credibility of Experience of a Single Private Passenger Car Flashcards
Experience Rating Formula
Mod = ZR + (1-Z)
Z = credibility
R = ratio of actual loss experience to expected loss experience
Calculating the Mod
[(# of claims with rating) / (on-level EP for rating at present ’B’ rates)]/[(# of claims in total for class) / (class total on-level EP at present ’B’ rates)]
Calculating R
Years claim-free R
1+ 0
0 1/[1−e^(−λ)]
where λ = (# of claims from class) / (earned car years of insureds in class)
When to use a premium base for frequency
Hazam states that a premium base only eliminates
maldistribution if:
- High frequency territories are also high average premium territories.
- Territorial (rate) differentials are proper.
Poisson formula
Pr(X = k) = [ λ^k*e^(−λ) ]/ k!
Conclusions of paper
- The experience of a single car for 1 year has significant and measurable credibility for experience rating.
- Individual risk experience is more credible when there is more variance in loss experience within a risk class, which occurs in less refined risk classification systems.
- The credibilities for varying years of experience should increase in proportion to the # of years of experience.
Credibility for 2 and 3 years of experience relative to 1
year
The credibility increases in proportion to the # of years only for low credibilities.
The closer the credibilities for 2 and 3 years of experience are to 2 and 3 times the 1 year credibility, then the less variation in insured’s probability of an accident. This could be due to:
- Less risks entering/exiting the portfolio.
- Risk characteristics not changing much over time.
Bühlmann Credibility
Suppose X is a random variable with some distribution with parameter Θ, and Θ itself is a random variable with some distribution and additional parameters. In that case, the credibility of a sample of n observations from X is given by:
Z = n/(n+k)
n = # of claims in sample
k =E[Var(X|Θ)] / Var(E[X|Θ])