A.2 compatibility with english law Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

beginning of life- unborn child

A

english law views a foetus becomes a person when baby is born and takes at least one breath outside womb
(CP v First tier tribunal) - foetus could not be ‘another person’ before birth
consistent with Vo v France

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

beginning of life- abortion and right to life

A

legal up to 24 weeks under Abortion Act 1967
is there’s substantial risk to womans life, no time limit

compatible with A.2 and margin of appreciation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

end of life, right to die- suicide

A

Suicide Act 1961 decriminalised suicide so it no longer offence
however, makes it criminal offence for person to ‘aid, abet, counsel or procedure the suicide of another or attempt suicide

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

end of life, right to die - assisted suicide, R (Pretty) v DPP

A

right to life is not determined by quality of life so couldn’t be interpreted as also giving right to die

where state has law making assisted suicide legal, no breach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

end of life, right to die - withdrawl of treatment, Ms B v An NHS

A

right to determine what shall be done with one’s own body is a fundamental right, ventilator could be turned off

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

end of life, use of life support machines - question of when support can be stopped, causing death of person

A

Airedale NHS Trust v Bland
HoL gave permission for withdrawing support
guidelines subsequently published

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

end of life, use of life support machines - R v Malcherek

A

Decided court’s switching off of life support machine did not break chain of causation, here when it was turned off a conviction of murder allowed for person who’d put them in state
test of death- where brain stems had died

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

state’s duty to protect life - life threatening environmental risks

A

potential issue of compatibility comes from question of enforcement of legislation
Grenfell Tower, investigated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

state’s duty to protect life - Hill v Chief constable of west yorkshire

A

relationship between V and police was not sufficiently close (proximate) for police to owe duty of care

Robinson v Chief constable of west yorkshire - ruled case of Hill didn’t confer on the police a blanket of immunity to negligence
injury to bystander by police carrying out arrest. there was a positive act, reasonably foreseeable risk of injury =duty imposed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

state’s duty to protect life- prevention of suicide by prisoners

A

Keenan v UK- not been a breach of positive obligation in failing to take steps to prevent suicide of mentally ill prisoner.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

state’s duty to protect life- suicide that nearly succeeds, which leaves V with serious injuries

A

JL v Secretary state for justice

courts decided there exists a similar duty to hold an enhanced investigation as exists after a suicide

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

state’s duty to protect life- protection against medical malpractice -Savage v South Essex NHS

A

general compliance with A.2
required NHS to do all that can reasonably be expected to prevent patient from committing suicide, if fail to do this, liable for negligence, violation to protect life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

state’s duty to protect life- protection against medical malpractice, Rabone v Pennine Care NHS

A

released for home leave from psychiatric ward despite concerns of her parents, next day she committed suicide
trust failed to do all that could reasonably have been expected to prevent real and immediate risk of suicide

A.2 breached

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

state’s duty to make an adequate investigation into loss of life

A

where death occurs without engagement of A.2, coroner looks at who died, when, where, how

if A.2 is engaged, investigation will include wider circumstances of death e.g. not only how but also in what circumstances person came by death
Tainton v Preston and West Lancashire - breach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

state’s duty to make an adequate investigation into loss of life , mental health cases

A

reporting a death is not always adequate in mental health cases
all deaths in state detention should be examined by a coroner
inconsistencies between official data on deaths reported to coroners suggests coroners may not have had conducted inquests into every death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

justified exception A.2(2), defence of person from unlawful violence

A

Armani Da Silva v UK, court set out test in line with english law on self-defence

17
Q

justified exception A.2(2), in order to affect a lawful arrest/prevent escape of lawfully detained

A

police officers have duty to act professionally, only use force that is proportionate, reasonable, justifiable in circumstances, otherwise its unlawful.

police and criminal evidence act 1984 states force may be used when permitted in any other legislation

act requires codes of practice to be established, these set out what is considered as reasonable force
=comply with A.2

18
Q

justified exception A.2(2), in action lawfully taken for purposes of quelling a riot or insurrection

A

2 possible violations:

  • whether action was absolutely necessary
  • whether investigation following incident complied with requirement under A.2