A&R Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Labels are gonna be “more convinced” by a talent whose project(s) and/or material are impressing someone else, especially if said person is someone whose opinion they trust. This is why most A&Rs will not reply to you if you send them music directly, with exceptions.

It’s important to remember that there are far more musicians reaching out to them and sending music than they can logistically keep up with; that’s just the reality of it.

And that’s why they have trusted sources for music whom they prefer to deal with, because these sources have already “pre-screened” the music for them a bit — which helps them narrow down their final selections that they end up signing.

That’s, again, not to say that A&Rs don’t scour the internet and keep their eyes and ears open to what’s poppin’ in the indie world; they definitely do.

If you’re doing sufficiently big things on your own, the labels will eventually reach out to you themselves.

But in those cases, they will be the one to reach out to you, and it’s not common for it to work the other way around, unless you’re connected with one of their trusted sources.

A

Source: Jake Niemi
https://avriality.com/what-labels-look-for/

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Shameless self-promotion is kinda frowned-upon in most industry circles. It’s a thing. In fact, many people in the business find self-promotion straight up annoying.

A

Source: Jake Niemi
https://avriality.com/what-labels-look-for/

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Having great press coverage is not a mandatory prerequisite to attract major record labels, per se’. One of the major label subsidiaries we consult has actually stated that they “don’t care about that stuff,” that they just care about the music.

A

Source: Jake Niemi
https://avriality.com/what-labels-look-for/

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

We live in a world where an unusual look is sometimes actually preferred by certain A&Rs and labels.

For example, it’s been proven that androgyny sells. Not every artist is androgynous — like Prince, David Bowie, Annie Lennox, etc. — and therefore this is one example of an “it” factor that can make an artist stand out. But there are many factors that can do that. Again, just one example.

Now, for songwriters, producers, composers and DJs, and even artists alike, the “it” factor looks like having that je ne sais quoi quality, or an air of mystery or intrigue. That something different in the vibe of the records you send in.

While you don’t want to be totally out of “left field” necessarily, because that can turn off a label… you also don’t want to be a carbon copy of a talent the label has already signed, or a musician that is already big in the scene currently.

I once had a label say something like, “This artist is awesome but we already have an Usher.” (It wasn’t Usher, specifically, but you get the idea here.)

Mind you, having some influences from known musicians and songs is fine and totally cool — and throwback vibes are sometimes dope, depending — but labels don’t want to release the same music over and over. They want each new signing to have an edge over what’s already out, ideally.

And yes, it’s possible the label would sign such a song. But there’s also a chance — in my opinion, an even greater chance — that the label will pass on such a song, no matter how good it is, and may even cite their rationale as being, “This sounds too similar to what this artist has put out; we want something different to break the mold a bit.”

(FYI: The aforementioned is almost verbatim what we’ve sometimes heard from some of the top major A&Rs we consult.)

A

Source: Jake Niemi
https://avriality.com/what-labels-look-for/

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Artists are constantly evolving and reinventing. That’s how they stay relevant. A good goal is to stay super updated not only on what music is out, hot and “currently working” in mainstream (Billboard hit records and heavy streamers on music platforms), but also listen to what music is “bubbling under” in the underground.

Producers and songwriters should be evolving, too, to stay relevant. Usually, the biggest indie music sounds “futuristic” or “post-modern” in terms of prod, and ahead of the curve versus what’s currently trending at the top.

You can absolutely generate your own “it” factor. It’s all in the mind. But just know labels will be looking for it, especially when it comes to artists and DJs.

Sometimes being more raw and honest — perhaps being brave enough to show your face without makeup or filters once in a while, just for one example — can go a long way.

Talking openly about your story, your struggles with mental health, self-reflection, childhood, love, loss, loneliness and so on can also help people feel related-to.

Labels, industry professionals and fans alike love a great backstory. It gives them a glimpse into your creative process, and offers an opportunity for human connection that transcends — but also seamlessly blends — with the music itself.

We would argue that everyone is born with some “it” factor, but those who use it to their advantage are those who push the boundaries and put themselves out there, unabashedly.

When it comes to producers, songwriters and composers, vibe in your music is a huge part of your “it factor.” But so is how you interact with people in the business.

A

Source: Jake Niemi
https://avriality.com/what-labels-look-for/

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Record labels are looking to sign artists that have staying power, aka longevity. They don’t want an artist who is going to have one or two hits and then disappear. That’s a poor investment.

That’s not to say that having a couple great songs right now, ready to go, can’t get you a deal.

Sure, it can.

The more consistent you are at having songs with true hit potential in your arsenal, the more likely you are to pique and keep the industry’s attention.

On multiple occasions, we’ve had situations where we received a song from a band or artist that we thought was a no-brainer hit, but they had no follow-up.

This may sound cold and may surprise you, but: We usually won’t forward and pitch to a label an artist, DJ or band project that only has one potential hit, because labels want someone who can keep the hits comin’.

Major publishers, in particular, are typically going to be looking for consistency in songwriters, too. The pressure is even stronger, in this respect, if you’re looking to get a publishing deal.

Keep in mind that many substantial publishers may be looking for writers and producers who have a strong network and are already getting cuts on their own. Publishers, independent A&Rs like us and managers can make some alignments and set you up with great co-write sessions, but the ideal is for them not to have to do so, on their own.

Your hustle in this sense matters, obviously. We recommend you build your network, even if it’s small and strong. We may be able help with that, too, by making introductions with other talented and/or successful musicians, setting up collab sessions for you, and letting you take it from there to hopefully “make magic” together with other creatives you have powerful chemistry with.

Remember that the best networking includes making real friends and mingling with people on a human level. Most people don’t wanna feel like someone is “just networking” with them (although, this depends on the person, of course).

“Right place, right time” theory still persists. But being on the right social media platform and meeting the right people online is just as good, these days.

A

Source: Jake Niemi
https://avriality.com/what-labels-look-for/

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

A great song with a great story can be very powerful and engaging for its niche audience. But if you wanna reach the masses and garner the attention of people in the major record industry, your music will need to be catchy and memorable.

Record executives — especially those at major labels and publishers — not only want music they personally love, but music they think will resonate with a mass audience and ideally will have a lasting, major impact in the mainstream.

A&Rs are gonna be listening for songs that everyone is gonna be singin’ in the shower. If it sticks in their head after the first listen, there’s a greater likelihood that that will also be the reaction of listeners.

A&R representatives at record labels are hand-selected and vetted carefully, based on their ability to identify catchy and memorable music.

If your music falls flat in any way, A&Rs are gonna be bored and they may ignore everything else you ever send them. Don’t be paranoid or intimidated about this; many of them are good human beings who are patient. But they are insanely busy, too. Respect that.

The catchy and memorable characteristics of your songs are one of the most crucial, if not perhaps the most crucial aspect of your potential for a major record deal and/or publishing deal.

Your chorus hooks are perhaps the most important parts of your songs. You need to get to the first hook by the :45 second mark at the latest.

A

Source: Jake Niemi
https://avriality.com/what-labels-look-for/

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Max Martin — the third most-successful songwriter in recorded music history, behind only The Beatles’ Paul McCartney and John Lennon, respectively, and entirely eclipsing MJ in terms of #1 songs — has been known to say:

“Anyone can write a hit on accident once in a while;
DO IT ON PURPOSE.”

A

Source: Jake Niemi
https://avriality.com/what-labels-look-for/

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

You only get one chance at a first impression, as they say.

So approaching labels when you’re not sure you’re “bringing the goods,” so to speak, can be a huge mistake.

One of the biggest problems we see is musicians who want the success and accolades, but don’t wanna put in the work and refine their talent and material.

Just bring the goods. Just deliver.

Let how good you are speak for itself. Don’t get ahead of yourself or have a big head. This is bound to bite you in the a**.

Sure, it’s a mistake you can recover from, but if you wanna build a relationship with a label and maximize your chances of a deal, don’t waste their time with underdeveloped material or projects, if you can help it.

A

Source: Jake Niemi
https://avriality.com/what-labels-look-for/

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

“How do I know if my material
is ready for the masses?”

One key way to determine this is to have people with experience around you, who are advising you.

You may not always agree with their opinions, and sometimes your instincts will be right on and theirs will be totally off (it happens; no opinion is the end-all be-all, no matter whose it is).

But when there’s a consensus among experienced advisers and mentors around you that you’re on-point and bringing your A game, as we say… then — and only then, ideally — is the best time to start approaching labels.

If you think you’re the sh**, you probably aren’t. Most people who are truly at the peak of talent and viability have eaten their fair share of “humble pie,” so to speak. If you’re full of yourself, you probably need a few slices.

A friend and colleague of mine who is crazy successful and has worked with nearly every A-List artist under the sun once said, “You’ll never convince anyone of how good you are. Only your music and success can do that. Period.” And he was right on the money, both figuratively and literally.

One of my pet peeves in A&R is receiving music from unsigned artists who tell me all about their releases and how great their music is, before I even hear it. About 9 or 10 times out of 10, it’s not quite “there” yet, to my ears. And the fact that they assumed I would be in love with it irks me. I also find it insulting, because as an A&R, it’s my job to identify whether something is good to go, or not.

Never settle or “rest in your laurels.” You should always be growing, evolving and developing — and this is especially true in the early stages of your career.

A

Source: Jake Niemi
https://avriality.com/what-labels-look-for/

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Putting in the time and work on your own is obviously a critical step, but it’s typically not enough to stand up to the competition among those who are vying for labels’ attention.

That competition is beyond fierce. You may be amazing, but there’s always gonna be someone who might be more amazing that the same A&R is hearing and seeing.

And if this sounds like a lot of pressure, if not borderline intimidating, get used to it. That’s the rule and not the exception in the upper levels of this industry.

We’re in a new era where there are more opportunities than ever for musicians, but don’t underestimate how competitive the major music industry still is.

And look, don’t let it get to you; just try to grow a “thick skin” and stay in forward motion. They say a “thick skin” is requirement to survive in this crazy business, and I concur.

FYI — We at AvrConsultancy™ care about mental health, for sure! So don’t let my bluntness scare you. Just tryna keep it real, up in here! This is part of helping you get fully ready to hold your own more, and take on your most powerful mindset possible.

A good mentor always challenges his or her proteges. But there’s no way around it: You need to be super developed.

Development is key and should not be overlooked.

A

Source: Jake Niemi
https://avriality.com/what-labels-look-for/

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Surround yourself with great “mirrors.”

“Mirrors” mean people like us and others in the business, who can give you an experienced outside perspective and provide detailed feedback on what we’re seeing and hearing.

The idea of having great mirrors in your circle is something we picked up from our respected and distinguished colleague, Judy Stakee, who is a legendary music publisher, songwriting mentor, author and speaker.

Best known for her work as Sr. VP of Creative at Warner Chappell Music, Judy is responsible for signing and developing many of today’s most acclaimed artists and songwriters: Sheryl Crow, Katy Perry, Michelle Branch, Joy Williams, Jewel, Gavin DeGraw, Julian Bunetta, John Shanks — among many legendary artists and other creatives she’s directly worked with throughout her tenure in the music business.

Judy Stakee is a great “mirror” and teacher.

A

Source: Jake Niemi
https://avriality.com/what-labels-look-for/

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Trying to attract labels when you’re not ready, vetted and verified is highly not recommended. That can quickly get you a reputation as a pest who doesn’t know what they’re doing. Don’t be that person.

A

Source: Jake Niemi
https://avriality.com/what-labels-look-for/

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Career traction is one of your most powerful “weapons” in the music business. We are now in an era where independent musicians can wield this power more readily than ever, if they work smart.

Traction can include things like:

– Generating notable revenue from your recordings, songs and/or performances;
– Collaborating or sharing a stage with a well-known artist, writer or producer;
– Being sponsored by and/or co-branding with major companies;
– Generating a substantial, targeted and engaged fan base;
– Building a strong, recognizable brand;
– Notable coverage in major press outlets;
– Selling a ton of merch;
– Massive ticket sales;
– Being a powerful digital influencer on social platforms;
– Top positions on well-known charts (such as Billboard, iTunes, etc.);
– High streaming numbers and/or record sales;
– Support from well-known DJs, Spotify Playlisters and/or YouTube Channels;
– Honorable Mentions by Prominent Social Influencers
– Major Licensing & Sync Placements (in TV/Film, Ads and/or Video Games);
– TV coverage and/or celebrity mentions/endorsements;
– Any form of major publicity.

A

Source: Jake Niemi
https://avriality.com/what-labels-look-for/

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How important is traction to A&Rs?

In the dating scene, most people are looking for someone that they need more than the other person needs them. It’s human nature. It’s “the game.”

The music business is much like that. (This is why it’s important not to come off needy or desperate, too.)

Record labels and publishers are looking for talent that is already running a well-oiled machine, has their team ready to go and/or is an absolute master of their given craft.

A

Source: Jake Niemi
https://avriality.com/what-labels-look-for/

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

They say, “the numbers don’t lie.” Unfortunately, in the 2020s that’s no longer true. Nowadays, some unscrupulous musicians and/or their marketing companies of choice are “faking traffic” by generating fake plays or fake fans.

The labels can generally see fake traffic a mile away, and they won’t be interested, so don’t bother.

That’s not to mention the fact that social media and streaming platforms also have artificial intelligence that will most-likely eventually detect fake traffic and penalize you for it — at best, by removing the fake fans/plays; at worst, by deleting your account entirely and banning your permanently from the given platform. Ouch!

The truth is, the more actual money you can legitimately generate on your own from your work (as an artist or DJ) — and/or the more cuts you can score independently, which do well (as a producer or songwriter) — the more interested a label or publisher is likely to be, in our experience.

Labels look for smart investment opportunities.

Labels must invest their own revenue back into artist projects they believe in. And there’s always risk involved in such investments.

When artist projects don’t perform as successfully as anticipated, this is a financial loss for the label. This is something major labels know can happen, but their infrastructure is structured to minimize loss. That’s why they’re major.

They know there will be some losses, but they want to make wise investments, as much as possible. Your role, in this respect, is ideally to be as low-risk as possible, in terms of their investment dollar.

The more your accomplish on your own, the “lower risk” you are for the label, investement-wise. That’s good for both of you, at the end of the day.

As a bonus, the more you’ve accomplished on your own, the better your leverage position is when negotiating a deal. If you’re savvy and can pull this off prior to signing a deal with a major, your manager and lawyer will thank you for that, trust me.

But, in all honesty, not every talented musician and their team have the time, energy and wherewithal it takes to build such noteworthy initial momentum.

And it’s worth saying that what may you think is “noteworthy” may seem like straight up peanuts to a label, who sees indie artists getting millions of plays and having hundreds of thousands of fans on a daily basis.

A

Source: Jake Niemi
https://avriality.com/what-labels-look-for/

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Is it OK to reach out to a label without traction?

Yes, you can still do that, if you like. The likelihood you’ll garner their serious and lasting interest is just much lower than if you did have traction, though.

The less traction you have, the higher-risk you are for a label to sign and invest in you.

Unless you’re just an insane talent with a phenomenal song catalog and a totally unique vibe they’ve never seen before, of course.

But again, they’ve pretty much seen it all, so the chances what you’re doing is even going to phase them are like one in a million. Who knows, maybe you are that diamond in the rough, but I generally wouldn’t bank on it.

However, all that said, some of the major label subsidiaries we consult for say they don’t even take traction into account, that it’s all about the music. Whew! What a relief…

Some labels care about traction more than others.

In a perfect world, this is amazing, right?? And sure, labels can afford to “take chances” on unestablished talent and do so from time to time.

That said, you have to be beyond incredible — and uniquely so — to be one of those lucky few.

It’s typically your best “go” to align the right team and build up a real fan base and some actual cash from your music. We can help guide you in each of these capacities.

It’s also worth noting again, as a side bar, that you will definitely have more leverage to get a good record deal if you’re already bustin’ out on your own.

Having a powerful, relevant and unique brand is a huge factor, too. Just another thing to keep in mind.

Your best position to be in is for the label to need you more than you need them.

Generate as much traction as you can alone. In fact, if you build up enough, the labels will come to you and not the other way around. That’s ideal, right?

“If you build it, they will come.” It’s so true.

A

Source: Jake Niemi
https://avriality.com/what-labels-look-for/

18
Q

Major labels and subsidiaries typically do not accept unsolicited material. Even managers know to ask before sending music. Aka: Don’t SPAM record labels with your work without asking or (ideally) working through someone who has an established relationship with them. Not only will this be crazy unlikely to work out well for you, it can actually even potentially burn important bridges that will be hard if not impossible to mend later.

Many labels entirely ignore emails that aren’t from trusted sources or from people who never asked if they could send stuff in.

Don’t forget that A&Rs are people, just like you. Bear this in mind when you approach them. Don’t talk up or down to them. Just be real. And be human.

BE BRIEF. This is true of any email, and research proves that shorter emails are “more respond-able.” A few sentences, and (optionally) some bullet points about your project is more than enough.

If you have more info or a long list of accomplishments, add that as a PDF attachment or a link to your website or other press coverage.

Keep the body of the email itself short and sweet. ALWAYS.

A simple compliment on some of the A&R’s recent or legacy work can go a long way, to show that you don’t see them as a means to an end and that your email is customized to them specifically. This is especially true the first time you reach out.

Do your due diligence and know who you are talking to. DO NOT copy/paste the same message over and over and send it to a bunch of A&Rs or start your emails with a generic “hey,” “hello” or “to whom it may concern.” Address the A&R by name.

I’ve received submission emails from people who don’t even provide a greeting at the beginning of the message. Doh! Talk about a bad first impression. This is incredibly impersonal.

If you know someone they know in common, or have a relationship at another label or with someone else notable in the business, mentioning that can be potentially helpful, too. Depending.

With a caveat, though: Too much “name-dropping” can backfire, for sure. Never exaggerate your relationships in the business or your accomplishments. Huge no-no. That’s insulting to an A&R executive’s intelligence and will backfire on ya with a quickness. (Keep in mind: almost everybody in the business knows each other.)

Your subject line should be very clear as to why you’re emailing.

DO NOT — I REPEAT, DO NOT — boast and say they’re gonna love what you’re sending or that you’re the next best thing. If you’re an artist manager, same for you.

Don’t tell us as A&Rs what we’re gonna like. Let the music and press coverage speak for itself. Over-hyping looks really bad in an email and definitely can reduce your potential to be heard or responded-to.

Never attach or link more than 3 songs.

Send in your 3 best, max. This is an industry standard, if not an unspoken rule. And following this practice will show you know what you’re doing, thereby increasing the chance of being taken seriously.

Sometimes, just sending one song is effective, especially for a songwriter — as this requires less of the A&R’s time, so they can quickly check it out without a big time commitment. For artist projects, however, sending a few in can show that you have multiple potential hits up your sleeve and won’t just be a one hit wonder (if you have a hit at all). Also, sending 3 is good, since your top favorite might not be theirs.

If you send in playlists that have more than 3 songs, put your best 3 up top. The A&R will probably play those first, and won’t listen further if they aren’t into what they’re hearing at first. So don’t bury your best records in the middle or bottom of the playlist.

Links are often preferred, versus mp3 attachments.

Sending in links is ideal for most A&Rs because you’re not clogging their inbox. They get thousands and thousands of submissions and yes, the label has to pay for the space to store all the attachments. So use links, by default, whenever possible.

You can use a platform like Soundcloud to send in unreleased material, using the private link feature. Soundcloud has become a staple for this, and easily allows you to create playlists.

Just remember to send and test your private links before you hit send. Sending dead links is obviously gonna be embarrassing and waste the A&R’s time. Do anything you can to avoid doing that, and the relationship will last longer and won’t end before it begins, haha!

To increase the chances of a response, we may forward your material to labels with whom we have existing relationships, to give you a better shot.

A

Source: Jake Niemi
https://avriality.com/what-labels-look-for/

19
Q

This may seem to go without saying but… you have got to have music with commercial potential.

Some musicians think this means they have to “sell out” and do some canned, cheesy, bubble-gum, cliche’, watered-down fluff or “poppy” music.

That couldn’t be further from the truth.

We all wanna hear something fresh.

The labels are music fans just like you, and want to hear variety and originality just as much as (if not more than) you do when hearing new music.

That said, there are certain arguably objective characteristics of music that is considered commercially-viable. We can help you identify that in fine detail.

To start with: make sure everything is on-point, if possible. Especially if you’re an artist.

Whether for an artist pitch (shooting to get a deal as an artist) or song pitch (shooting to get your music recorded by a signed artist), we A&Rs typically have a checklist of criteria as far as what need to hear.

  1. Great, Discernible (Well-Mixed) Vocals — yes, even for “song demos”;
  2. Clean, Vibey Top-Notch Prod — even for acoustic (piano/vocal or guitar/vocal);
  3. Fantastic Chord Progressions;
  4. Earworms — catchy and memorable melodies;
  5. Strong, Relatable (Yet Original) Lyrics; and
  6. Eye-Catching, Relevant Song Titles.
A

Source: Jake Niemi
https://avriality.com/what-labels-look-for/

20
Q

On the other hand, the A&R is looking to discover the “next big thing” and sign it.

If all of your best music is already out — and you either (A) don’t send them any unreleased material, (B) you have music out and it isn’t getting much attention, or (C) your unreleased music isn’t on-par (at least songwriting- and vibe-wise) with your released material — the label may quickly pass on you.

A label may be more impressed by amazing unreleased music they have exclusive access to privately, than they might be by released music that’s only generating moderate traction.

We personally think that it’s best to wait to release your music until you either have a top-notch music marketing specialist working on your behalf to make sure it pops off, or until after you’ve let your manager (or us) send your music in to the right labels.

With exceptions, of course.

You also need to make sure your music is ready for the masses before releasing it, ideally. Releasing music that is “just OK” can potentially be a non-starter as far as attracting labels.

I’ve already released music and it’s not doing super well, in terms of streaming and fan interaction. Will labels turn me down because of this?”

No, don’t fret. If you have released music in the past but have gotten better since then, you don’t even need to mention the older material when you reach out to labels. We are happy to hear anything you’d like us to hear, during consultations. But it’s your best bet to put your best foot forward when it comes to labels.

While labels are obviously not going to turn down music they love just because your past material hasn’t been huge, lack of traction can affect how much of your music they will listen to in the first place.

In other words, the A&R may see you’re out there hustling but not be impressed by the results, and unfortunately may not even hear your latest and greatest, but move on to the next submission instead.

Releasing your own music is fine, especially if it’s well-marketed. Just try to be strategic about it.

Another thing to keep in mind is that you can always re-brand your artist project with a new name, if you’ve released music that didn’t find success, in the past.

As a songwriter, you should send in at least some music that’s unreleased, if possible. If your released music is doing huge things, then sending that in is, of course, a smart move, too.

Some publishers and labels don’t want to sign music that has already been released, because they want to be the one to release it, among other reasons.

They also might not wanna jump through the hoops necessary to re-assign the rights to the label (which is a typical, usually temporary provision of many deals)

A

Source: Jake Niemi
https://avriality.com/what-labels-look-for/

21
Q

When I have my A&R hat on, my role is to identify the components of a hit record and a project with promising commercial potential, my own tastes notwithstanding. If I can identify commercial potential regardless of whether it’s what I would listen to, I can help labels increase their bottom line. Which is the goal here, of course.

Ideally, we A&Rs want to find music that both has commercial potential and is what we’re proud to put our names on, so we can say “I discovered so and so” (“so and so” being a successful artist whose work we respect and with whom we don’t mind being associated).

How often do my tastes and what I forward align? Honestly, I try to leave my personal tastes out of it for the most part. And so I’d say maybe 10% of the time, something I forward is also a song I personally love and would listen to on repeat. But because I can identify a great record that sounds like it could work, without necessarily being a fan personally, this enables me to get the best music where it needs to go. And I find that gratifying, regardless. If I happen to love it, too, even better.

A

Source: Jake Niemi

A&R Interview (2019)

22
Q

A competent A&R should have their ears fine-tuned not only to what works now (along with what has historically worked), but also what the A&R feels will sound new and fresh.

When mainstream music becomes too homogenized due to A&Rs not being willing to trust their gut and take creative risks on artists and songs they believe in, music fans lose. Everyone loses.

The hottest record companies in the game are proficient at finding music that has a number of characteristics found in current and past hits – which has been tested at a base level and proven to work – while also being tastefully a bit postmodern.

I personally am looking for music that can push the envelope and sound new and fresh while also not trying to totally reinvent the wheel. Additionally, I am always keeping my ears peeled for vintage and classic elements and influences from the 70s, 80s and 90s. Throwback flavors and spices are just as essential as the more futuristic bent.

We know mainstream audiences have a need for what’s familiar but they also want that little extra somethin’-somethin’ that feels different and special, albeit in small doses. There is such a thing as too different, in theory at least. But we most definitely don’t want something stale that sounds like it’s already been done a million times, because people will tune that out.

One mark of an astute A&R executive is the ability to be cognizant of what types of sounds and vibes are phasing out (or are already played out), versus which sounds and vibes are still hype in the mainstream market and/or are bubbling like mad in the underground scene. Many of the submissions I receive have these stale sounds and that can be an absolute dealbreaker for me. Sorry not sorry. Artists must stay keen to trends while simultaneously finding and nurturing their own decidedly original signature sound.

A

Source: Jake Niemi

A&R Interview (2019)

23
Q

I rarely will forward what I hear – and bear in mind that I do hear a ton of records and artists via monthly submissions – and I receive far more material than I can logistically make time to listen for. What I do choose to listen to is partly random and partly strategic. On the one hand, of course, I will prioritize emails and calls with my trusted and established colleagues, particularly artist managers I’ve built relationships with.

On the other hand, I have discovered some diamonds in the rough by randomly listening to submissions that weren’t sent from trusted or established sources.

A

Source: Jake Niemi

A&R Interview (2019)

24
Q

Unearthing the undiscovered gems is what I live for, and it’s why I’m doing this! I love opening doors for those who don’t have other connections.

A

Source: Jake Niemi

A&R Interview (2019)

25
Q

Generally, I always listen for: vibe; melody; catchy hooks; relatable/conversational lyrics; strong titles and song topics (which I call “high concept,” a term I borrow loosely from Billboard #1 singer/songwriter Sia who cites this as her songwriting approach); simple yet vibey production; top notch vocals; impeccable vocal editing (ideally, pitch- and timing-corrected using a graphical editor like Melodyne – I can’t stand sloppy autotune); big mixing/mastering with balanced frequencies and vibrant low-end; etc. Engineering isn’t as important as everything else, because this can be fixed prior to release, but if it’s there when the song first hits my inbox… bonus, baby!

I do have priorities, among these elements. For example, I have a mantra that “melody is king.” You can have the best prod, vocals, mix and lyrics in the world but if the melody lacks an earworm and isn’t catchy (repetitive enough, within reason), then you probably don’t have a hit.

By the same token, you can have a perfect melody but the song’s concept is lacking and not casting a wide enough net, as I say. In other words, if I don’t think a big enough audience will relate to it, I probably won’t forward it, even if everything else in the record sounds amazing.

Now, if melody is king, I like to say that vibe is emperor. Vibe is even more important than melody, to the extent that I’ll prefer a record that boasts a super dope vibe (even if its melody isn’t quite as strong as another record), over a record with the best melodies that’s lacking in the vibe department.

At the end of the day, though, as my colleague Judy Stakee (30 year music industry veteren and former VP of Creative for Warner-Chappell) says, it really comes down to the “perfect storm.” The magical balance of all of the elements on my checklist.

That je ne sais quoi factor, or “It” factor is always at-play, as well. Sometimes a record or artist just has a thing about it/them that we just can’t exactly pinpoint or put a finger on, but we all know it’s there. That really rare, but I’m constantly and relentlessly combing the good ol’ ‘internets’ (aka my submissions email inbox) in search of that Holy Grail.

A

Source: Jake Niemi

A&R Interview (2019)

26
Q

We can’t not take analytics into account when evaluating the commercial propensity an artist has. Their online presence is integral to demonstrating their capacity to move the masses, and anyone who says otherwise is just trying to score brownie points.

Labels rarely – and I mean very rarely – will sign an act these days based on sheer instinct. Yes, there are exceptions, but again, super uncommon practice. In the ‘60’s? Different story. Different era, different approach.

And I might add that labels are now notorious – to the point where it’s basically a standing joke in the business circles – for not doing much, if any artist development. That’s where folks like me come in, in the peripheral of the labels’ inner courts, to nurture talent and unlock sounds, to get the music “ready for primetime,” so to speak.

A

Source: Jake Niemi

A&R Interview (2019)

27
Q

We’re not impressed by fake numbers, even though the viral effect generally involves some fluffing (this has been proven, with artists like Bieber and Gaga having been caught with a certain percentage of fake Twitter followers, for instance). So some fake traffic is probably going to happen with every big traffic because it jumpstarts the viral effect; but if all or most of the traffic is fake, intelligent label reps are more than likely going to avoid such projects like the plague.

A

Source: Jake Niemi

A&R Interview (2019)

28
Q

Fan engagement should look organic and natural. If we see the same comment from a bunch of different accounts, like every 5th comment or so, we can immediately deduce that enough of the traffic is fake to where there isn’t going to be enough revenue from merch and tix. Not to mention, taking revenue from streaming services based on fake views and plays is fraud.

So it’s not just about the numbers or the engagement. There is also some instinct and that instinct can be based on both common sense and proven models, alongside analytics which of course are going to be looked at. You have to look at analytics now. I do take issue with those who say that numbers and analytics are everything, though. If that were true, the A&R profession would be obsolete. And we know it’s not. I get sick of hearing people say that the clock is ticking on the lifespan of this vocation. I disagree, vehemently. It’s alive and well and not going anywhere, despite the rumors otherwise.

So to summarize the answer to this question: Yes, I do take social presence into consideration. But as you can see, the topic is quite nuanced. Would I forward an amazing, special artist if they had literally zero traction? Absolutely! 100%. Without hesitation, I would! Any A&R who says they wouldn’t consider a crazy-good artist just because they didn’t have their social marketing on lock is missing out and doing a disservice to the music scene, in my opinion.

One caveat, though. We do have a saying in the business: You can only guide a moving force. If the artist’s socials are lacking because they’re lazy, that laziness is going to show up in other parts of the project, and that spells problems later on down the road. It’s important to identify the artist’s mindset and not just rely on mere talent, because mere talent does not a successful project make.

But sometimes the socials are lacking because the artist just lacks marketing savvy and/or sufficient budget to make great strides in that area, but are super driven creatively and outputting quality material on the regular, playing shows as much as possible, and so forth. That’s a good foundation, and the socials can be built from there.

A

Source: Jake Niemi

A&R Interview (2019)

29
Q

Let’s also not forget that there are a handful of artists who are absolutely killin’ it in the independent scene who indeed do not want to be signed to a major or subsidiary, because they don’t feel inclined to give up the oblong share of the pie that a major is going to demand to take.

If someone’s streaming numbers are through the roof, they are already making a living from their music and might not need a major. 2019 is cool like dat.

The indie scene is changing and growing exponentially right now, and more and more unsigned acts are nailing it without the need for a label. The labels aren’t gonna go out of business any time soon, though. They may not have a monopoly on huge success like in decades passed, but they still represent a powerhouse. Majors have the resources and strategies that are tried and true which most indie musicians lack.

So no, I don’t think the labels need an artist to have insane numbers on streaming, because that’s not the only factor they’re looking at. The potential for huge numbers is important.

For example, if you take an artist whose streaming stats are modest to intermediate, but the fan engagement is super strong, ratio-wise, and appears organic, and there’s some revenue starting to take hold as a result, we can deduce that given the marketing power and access to mainstream radio (and top level playlisters) a label has at their disposal, this ratio of streams-to-engagement will persist when you scale the project up.

A

Source: Jake Niemi

A&R Interview (2019)

30
Q

It’s definitely important in A&R to be able to identify which songs work for the direction we think will work for a specific artist. Right song, wrong artist is something I definitely see at times. And I also see right artist, wrong song. From my perspective, smart A&R methodology entails the ability to detect and dissect all of these subtle nuances, and align the right teams comprising creatives whose strengths complement one another’s weaknesses. Curating talent and assembling the right teams is a huge game-changer for an A&R.

If an artist wants to cut through “the noise”, they really just need to nail a topic that we can all relate to. I have a saying: “Sometimes, only the song understands.” I’m personifying music here, but have you ever been sitting alone listening to songs that resonate perfectly with your story, where the words say what you’re feeling better than you yourself could articulate?

I would say those songs are the definitive thing, if any, that can cut through, pique our ears and attention, move our souls, heal our minds and hearts, speak for us where we couldn’t find the words, and at the end of the day, this is what I think can turn heads en masse. I tell artists that the best songs happen when the common threads between the most meaningful parts of the artist’s story and our story (the story of humanity) meet.

A

Source: Jake Niemi

A&R Interview (2019)

31
Q

In a word: no, I wouldn’t forward such an artist. And development in this scenario is going to obviously be out of the question, by virtue of the bad attitude. I like great vibes in records but I also like great vibes in the artists I opt to work with. I don’t tolerate the “diva” attitude, no matter how talented a given artist might be.

The artist has to be open to constructive feedback, or it’s not going to work and it’s going to be a waste of everyone’s time. I have to value my time and direct my attention strategically; otherwise, I logistically won’t be able to show up effectively for those who I can genuinely help.

And look, that’s not to say that an artist I perceive as being stubborn and in need of development can’t do it their way and still succeed. I just don’t feel it would be adequate or mindful use of my time and resources to stick around and see. Rarely do I ever get real with an artist who I see as being obstinate. I just move on and give them less (if any) of my time.

I’ve actually gotten real with a stubborn artist before, and they wouldn’t listen, but later after I withdrew from giving them my time and attention, they came back and admitted they realized I was right and apologized for resisting and ignoring my experience and knowledge.

Not that I’m the quintessential expert here, either. But I’ve been in the scene for quite a few years and the major labels, publishers and subsidiaries trust my ears for a reason. I expect creatives to show a certain degree of respect for that, but I make it a point to admit that I can be wrong just like any human being can be. And if I am wrong, I would definitely later congratulate an artist for ignoring my advice if doing so transmutes into success subsequent to my involvement.

With all that said, I do have documents and checklists that are based on analysis of hundreds of hit songs (my focus is primarily on the music itself). So if someone can look at my checklists and disagree with me, they’re basically disagreeing with #1 songs, and I don’t know where we can go from there.

I may not be the expert among the experts, but if I can accurately identify the characteristics of a hit or an iconic artist, and reveal that to those I wish to develop, and they ignore this insight, where can we go from there? It puts me between a rock and a hard place, so I tend to move on when this happens.

My girl Gabi works in A&R at Universal Music Group in LA. She works directly with the General Manager of UMG globally across all territories, Celine Joshua. (Gabi enlisted me this year to help her with A&R.) She and I were talking on the phone a few months ago. And one of the things she was saying is that they are not just looking for great artists, but great artists who are fully ready in every sense of the term. They have to have the right attitude, mindset, the right team and so on. And that’s where the right brand and records are going to stem from.

But look, again, I can only make suggestions. And by no means do I expect every artist to take every suggestion I have or go in every direction I propose they go in. I’m here to guide, not puppeteer.

A

Source: Jake Niemi

A&R Interview (2019)

32
Q

I identify their strengths and try to always start with compliments on those, and then I’ll shift the conversation into these “areas of potential advancement,” as I like to say. As A&Rs, we are just as much life coaches as anything else, so the well-being of the artist should be primordial.

If the artist is in a positive, empowered state of mind, development is going to be more effective. I also try to instill in them that they should never stop dreaming big, but they should be pragmatic at all times as well, and should always be aspiring to maximize their business acumen as much as they focus on developing their art.

A

Source: Jake Niemi

A&R Interview (2019)

33
Q

HOW MUCH WORK DO YOU PUT INTO INDIVIDUAL SONGS TO HELP THE ARTISTS END PRODUCT BE MORE SUITABLE FOR THE COMMERCIAL MARKET?

Well, I’m the A&R so really the artist and their creative team put in the work, not me. My role is to provide useful feedback and direct them to resources to achieve the most commercially-viable sound possible. But applying this feedback and putting the resources to good use is up to the creatives themselves.

Now, I am a musician myself, so if they want my help, I can co-write songs, executive produce the material, etc. But I don’t force myself into their creative zone; I just let them know I’m available if they’d like an extra set of hands or ears on things.

The line between “doing A&R” and “executive producing” is a thin one, and it’s a little frustrating when I find myself reviewing the same song repeatedly without being offered an executive producer credit. At some point, after I’ve given a certain amount of “feedback,” I’m honestly co-producing the song now and I should be cut in.

That’s why I will only listen to the same song a couple times max, unless the artist and I happen to be good friends. And if an artist is in great need of development, I run an A&R Consulting service and I get paid for my time to be involved. I do give free feedback when I have time, but if they want me to be dedicated, I expect to be paid for it. Time is money!

If an artist is super, super special, and I feel assured they are the next best thing with very little need for development based on my assessment, I will help out these select few ongoing without expecting pay, but that’s a rare thing. I also think it’s pretty standard to listen to music for free and forward it for free. The best music deserves to get where it needs to go.

However, some artists and songwriters find it beneficial to pay me for real time undivided listening sessions, wherein I’ll impart feedback and give specifics on the spot about why I’m going to forward or not forward certain material they shoot over to me. I’ll walk thru their playlist and identify point-by-point exactly what I’m hearing and how it affects whether or not it’s getting forwarded to a big label/publisher.

Artists and writers seem to love this, because when they hit the studio, they can write potential hits on purpose based on proven insights, rather than every song being a shot in the dark. And to me, when I see this change in a creative, when I see the “light bulb” go off, that eureka moment, that’s when I feel accomplished and blessed to do what I do. Knowing I could make a difference in someone’s life.

I heard a saying, “Be who you needed when you were younger.” And I try to do that. I started off as an aspiring recording artist myself and had a huge following on Myspace before I later decided to shift gears and focus on songwriting and A&R. The artist path wasn’t for me, for a number of reasons. But I love helping artists for whom I believe that path is in fact the right one.

A

Source: Jake Niemi

A&R Interview (2019)

34
Q

We have a saying: A hit isn’t a hit until it’s a hit. In other words, we can think we know what’s going to work and what’s not going to work, and we can always be proven wrong. That’s the beauty of this crazy adventure we call the music industry.

No one knows exactly what they’re doing, at any level. There’s a lot of experimentation and educated guessing going on. I know big A&Rs who literally don’t understand how music works and just do their jobs based on how the music is making them feel. And there’s nothing wrong with that. After all, vibe is emperor, right?

A

Source: Jake Niemi

A&R Interview (2019)

35
Q

The importance of simplicity and minimalism in production. And that’s something on my checklist today. When I listen to music sent to me, I’m listening for a balance of vivid instruments and vocals, along with warmer elements to act as “glue” at times.

But no, “wall of sound” production hasn’t worked very well in mainstream music in the 2010s, even if it did off and on in the 80s and 90s and parts of the 2000s. The number of instruments/elements in a mix is less important than what they’re doing, how they’re mixed, and the sound choices and vocal performances.

As far as opining on which genres tend to have music that sounds overproduced, I would say maybe in EDM this happens sometimes. People think putting everything but the kitchen sink into a mix is the way to a good/full song, and being the proponent of minimalism that I am, I completely disagree as a general rule.

Rock bands do this, too. Lots of layers of guitars and other instruments can sound super cool if the record calls for it, but what the layers are doing matters. It’s crucial that what you layer works together in sync, harmoniously and in a non-conflicting way. For example, too many melodies happening at once can confuse the listener and cause distraction.

A

Source: Jake Niemi

A&R Interview (2019)

36
Q

MAINSTREAM SONG CONCEPT CRITERIA

A strong song topic meets one (ideally more than one) of the following criteria:

  1. Conversational — phrased the way people really talk
  2. Relatable — nails an Important Emotion, Common to the Human Condition
  3. Epitomizes Song’s Meaning — You Can Tell Without Hearing It, What It’s About
  4. Zeitgeist (Spirit of the Time) — Now / Relevant / Trending Phrase and/or Topic
  5. Utilizes Trending Cliche’ — contains all or part of a cliche that hasn’t been recently used in song titles — but isn’t “out” of trend or played-out otherwise)
  6. Similar to Older or Recent Hit Song
    — uses a Song Topic/Concept “Proven to Work”; and/or
    — Borrows from Older Hit Song Title / Lyric (with or without a twist); and/or
    — Uses a general storyline and vibe that is proven to work in (older or especially fairly recent) music history
  7. Ironic — Balance Of Opposites (e.g. “Love The Way You Lie”)
  8. Correlates with Common Routines — Relates to something we do and/or experience regularly, daily or many times per day
  9. Accessibly Poetic — Utilizes a Strong Methaphor/Simile in Title/Topic/Hook
  10. Relevant to Target Demographic — May relate to something identifiable to the primary music buying public (age group, territory, etc.), based on research
  11. Search Engine Optimized (SEO) — May be a word or phrase people tend to search for on Google which is not yet a song’s title (or not yet a hit song’s title)
  12. Hashtag Optimized — May relate to a trending Hashtag.
  13. Relates to an Extreme — uses an extreme word or phrase (e.g. Titanium = extremely strong; Chandelier = extremely free/crazy/wild; Dynamite = extremely explosive)
A

Source: Jake Niemi

37
Q

MAINSTREAM SONG LYRICS CRITERIA

Lyrics supporting such Song Topics typically are one or more of the following:

  1. Cohesive — Aka they support & tie-in w/strong mainstream song topic’s main story (no veering too far into different storyline)
  2. Conversational — Ask yourself, “Is this something someone would really say?” and/or “Would readily understand/relate to, without much analysis?”
  3. Universal — appeal to a massive segment of the population
  4. Utilizing Trending Cliches — current and relevant not overused in songs
  5. Emotionally-Charged — thought-provoking
  6. Not “Vanilla” — not bland or overly-basic; don’t leave yourself or your story “out of the room” when writing
  7. Accessibly Poetic — the meaning(s) of the metaphor/simile is obvious and readily accessible for the average person, with exceptions
A

Source: Jake Niemi

38
Q

MAINSTREAM SONG CONCEPTS & LYRICS RESOURCES

Cheat Sheets and Ideas for Idioms / Catch phrases / Cliche’s / Trends:

— Urban Dictionary / Urban Thesaurus
— Google Trends (https://trends.google.com/trends/?geo=US)
— Google Potential Song Title (SEO): see if a hit song is associated with it
— Popular Hashtag Checker (Google this — there are many such tools)
— Idioms and phrases (https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/) ← (Live Feed)

A

Source: Jake Niemi

39
Q

I don’t expect an artist to come to me and have their shit organized – that’s what I’m here for.

I expect an artist to come to me with a vision, and to want to do this for the right reasons.

A

https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/wassim-sal-slaiby-i-dont-expect-artists-to-have-their-st-organized-thats-what-im-here-for/

40
Q
Most Billboard Hot 100 songs:
237, Drake
207, Glee Cast
175, Lil Wayne
137, Taylor Swift
124, Future 
119, Nicki Minaj
110, Kanye West
109, Elvis Presley
105, Chris Brown
102 Justin Bieber
102, Jay-Z
A

Eric Alper on Facebook