A Poter Glossary: Key Concepts Flashcards
Activities?
Discrete economic processes, such as operating a sales, force, developing products, or physical delivery to the customer. And activity usually involves people, technology, fixed assets, sometimes working, capital, and various types of information. The activities companies perform are the basic units of competitive advantage, because they are the ultimate source of both relative cost and the level of differentiation a company can offer its customers.
Barriers to entry?
The hurtles, a new entrance would have to surmount in order to enter an industry. Low entry barriers, industries that are easy to enter, lower the industries, average profitability. The threat of new entrance is one of the five forces.
Barriers to imitation?
The hurdles facing a rival within an industry, who tries to move from one positioning to another, in order to copy another company strategy. Barriers to imitation, slow the process of competitive convergence.
Clusters?
Geographic concentrations of companies, suppliers, related industries, and specialized institutions, such as academic programs, think Hollywood entertainment, for example, Silicon Valley, technology, or Seward, India, diamond cutting. Clusters play an important role in competition because a company’s productivity is influenced by the presence of light firms, institutions, and infrastructure around it. With affective local suppliers of time sensitive services, for example, a company will be more efficient. Clusters draw on local assets and institutions, such as public education, physical infrastructure, clean water, fair, competition laws, quality standards, and transparency. Clusters are prominent features of all successful and growing economies, and a crucial driver of competitiveness, entrepreneurship, and new business growth. For more on this topic, see clusters and competition in porters on competition in 2008.
Competition?
The term is commonly used to refer to rivals in rivalry, but for Porter, this definition is too narrow. Competition is the tug-of-war over profits that occurs not just between rivals, but also between a company and its customers, it’s suppliers, makers of substitutes, and potential new entrance.
Competitive advantage?
The term is commonly used to mean here’s what we think we’re good at, as in our competitive advantage is technology. Or, it is used even more loosely, as in our competitive advantage, lies in our people. Porters definition is tightly linked to the economics of competition, you have competitive advantage, if your profitability is sustainably higher than that of your rivals. Then you can dig further to understand whether that advantage comes from higher prices, lower cost, or some combination of both. These differences in relative prize or relative cost arise because of differences in the activities being performed.
Competitive convergence?
What happens when companies imitate and match each other’s moves, when they compete to be the best. Overtime all companies begin to look alike as one difference after another erodes. When rivals converge around a standard offering, customers must choose on price alone. Main stream economics has always highlighted the way in which this kind of perfect competition benefits customers by lowering prices. The Porter sees it differently. Convergence can actually hurt customers because it limits their choice.
Competitiveness (of a nation, a location)?
The term is commonly used to describe a region or country with low cost labor or some other conventional comparative advantage, such as access to a valuable natural resource. Importers view, the focus on low cost inputs, on comparative advantage, is far less relevant and it once was. Porter defines the competitiveness of a location in terms of how productively it uses Human and natural resources as well as its capital. Competitiveness arises, in other words, from how well a location uses inputs to produce valuable goods and services, not from the inputs it has. It arises from choices, not endowment. Moreover, Porter argues that the productivity and prosperity possible in a given location, depend not on what industries, its firms compete in, but on how they compete. Policy makers and executives, through their choices, create a business environment that affects our companies compete, and thus their competitiveness. For more on this topic, see the competitive advantage of nations in our competition 2008.
Competitor analysis?
Intelligence gathering and analysis aimed at helping a company deal with competitive dynamics by assessing the intentions and capabilities of rivals. For more on this topic, see Porter seminal work in chapter 3 of competitive strategy, 1980.
Continuity?
Porter uses the term to refer to stability in the core value proposition. It is his fifth test a good strategy. A strategy is a path, not a destination. A company can stay on the path without standing still, a distinction that is misunderstood by those who think that strategy is somehow static, or that it does not allow for change. All of the other elements of strategy, tailoring a value chain to the value proposition, extending trade-offs, achieving fit, across activities, take time to develop. Without continuity of direction, a company would be unable to develop and dependence, competitive advantage.
Corporate strategy?
The overall strategy for a corporation that consist of diversified, businesses and multiple industries, it is not the same thing as competitive strategy. Because competitive advantage is one or loss at the level of an individual business, the goal of corporate strategy should be to enhance the competitive advantage of its multiple business units. But because the corporation sits on top of the business units and is the seat of power and control, this distinction is often lost in practice. The card often leads the horse, giving corporate synergy a bad name. For more information on this topic see from competitive advantage to corporate strategy importers on competition 2008.
Cost driver?
The factors that influence cost. And analyzing a companies cost position, look at each distinct activity to see which factors influence the cost of that activity. Competitive advantage 1985 has a 50 page chapter on this important subject.
Diamond theory?
A major porter framework not covered in this book that explains why some nations and regions achieve greater economic success in a given industry than others. Comparative advantage attributes a region success to low cost labor or access to a valuable natural resource. In contrast, Porter highlights the role of competitive advantage, achieved through higher productivity, and innovation. These arise, according to diamond theory, where the local environment is the most forward, thinking, dynamic, and challenging. See the competitive advantage of nations, 1990.
Differentiation?
The term is most commonly used to simply tint mean different. In marketing, it is used to describe how one offering is positioned in relation to others, it might offer more quality or features, or it might sell at a lower price. Porter uses this term more narrowly to refer to a companies ability to commend a higher relative price than rivals because its offering has increased customers willingness to pay. Porter prefers this narrower and more precise definition because he believes it is essential not to confuse the two components of competitive advantage, price, and cost.
Diversification?
The expansion of a company into different businesses. Porters thinking about diversification is directly linked to the value chain and its activities. Too often, Porter, observes, core competences that are vaguely defined, provide a rationale for diversification that turns out to be in businesses that are actually unrelated. The challenge in diversification is to identify activities or activity systems that can be shared with new businesses, or to find businesses where your proprietary skills in managing specific day activities can be transferred. This is how valuable resources or competences can be leveraged. For more on this topic, see from competitive advantage to corporate.
Execution?
See operational effectiveness (OE)
Fit?
When the value or cost of one activity is affected, by the way, other activities are perform. One of the five basic test of a good strategy, fit can amplify the value of a competitive advantage by lowering cost, or by producing unique value that raises a customers willingness to pay. It also amplifies the sustainability of a strategy, making it harder for rivals to understand and copy the strategies complex system of activities.
Five forces?
Corders seminal framework for assessing competition in any industry by analyzing the industry structure. The framework explains the large and sustained differences in profitability from one industry to another. Five forces analysis is the first step in thinking about the strategy, about how to shift the forces in your favor, and where are you might be able to establish a unique positioning. For the framework and an extensive application of it, see the five competitive forces, that shape strategy and strategy and Internet importers on competition 2008.
Frameworks?
The term porter uses to distinguish his approach from formal economic models. Formal models can capture only those aspects of competition that can be represented and solve mathematically, and this requires sharply limiting the number of variables that can be considered. Porters frameworks, except that competition is too complex to lend itself to formal modeling, they are more like expert systems help you to consider the relevant dimensions of competition..
Generic strategies?
Broad characterizations of the key themes of strategic positioning. A focused strategy chooses to limit the scope of customers and needs that the company serves. A differentiation strategy allows a company to commend a premium price, while cost leader ship, allows it to compete by offering a low relative price. The idea of generic strategies was a seminal concept first described by Porter in competitive strategy in 1980 and has been widely embraced by managers ever since. Effective strategies typically integrate multiple themes in a unique way. You can be differentiated in some ways to be low-cost, for example, as long as the particular kind of differentiated values is not inconsistent with low cost. See stuck in the middle.
Geographic scope?
For strategy, it is critical to draw the geographic boundaries of your industry correctly. Is your business, global, national, regional, or local? Significant differences in the five forces suggest that you may be dealing with separate industries. There has been a tendency, porter notes, to defined businesses as being global, when in fact, there are significant differences in industry structure from one country or region to the next would do men different strategies. See competing across locations, enhancing competitive advantage through a global strategy in on competition 2008.
Global strategy, globalization?
See geographic scope
Industry structure?
The basic, underlying economic, and technological characteristics of an industry that shape a competitive arena in which strategy must be set. Analyzing industry structure is the place to start in order to understand the competitive environment, as well as the profit potential of the industry. See five forces
Operational effectiveness (OE)?
Commonly called best practice or execution by managers, 0E is porters umbrella term for a companies ability to perform the same or similar activities better than rivals. OE includes a multitude of practices that allow a company to get more out of the resources it uses. Every functional area has its current best practices, the best way to load a factory, the best way to train, a salesforce, and so on. Differences in OE are pervasive and can explain some differences in relative profitability. 0E is about achieving excellence in execution. OE is important to performance, but it is different from strategy. For more on OE see what is strategy? In porters on competition 2008