A-Level OCR Property Offences Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What type of offence is Theft?

A

Triable-either-way (Can be tried in either the Magistrates’ court or the Crown Court.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the maximum sentence for a charge of theft?

A

7 Years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What act is the AR of Theft defined under?

A

s.1 Theft act 1968

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the AR of Theft?

A

“The dishonest approbation of property belonging to another with the intent to permanently deprive.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the first element of the AR of Theft that needs to be applied and defined and which section does it come under?

A

“Approbation” - s.3 of the Theft Act 1968

“Assumption of the rights of the owner”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was the outcome of Morris and what does it come under?

A

Morris: s.3 Theft act - Approbation
Took 2 tags in a supermarket and swapped them over so he didn’t have to pay as much
HELD: Liable as he ‘assumed the rights of the owner’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the outcome of Lawrence and what does it come under?

A

Lawrence: s.3 Theft act - Approbation
Taxi driver took more than the fare from an Italian student
HELD: The student only consented to the fare being taken from his wallet, so despite the consent there was still an approbation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the second element of Theft you have to describe and apply and which section does it fall under?

A

“Property” - s.4 Theft act 1968

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Which items are NOT property according to s.4 of the Theft act?

A
Wild plants (Unless sold for profit)
Wild animals (Unless in captivity)
Information (Unless personal)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the outcome of Oxford and Moss and what does it come under?

A

Oxford and Moss: s.4 Theft act - Property
D took the answers to an exam from the school
HELD: Information was not property, so there was no theft

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

That is the third element of the theft act that you have to describe and apply and which section does it fall under?

A

“Belonging to another” - s.5 Theft act 1968

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the outcome of Turner and what does it come under?

A

Turner: s.5 Theft act - Belonging to another
D took his car back from a garage without paying for the repairs that they did to it
HELD: It was a theft as the garage were in ‘possession and control’ of the vehicle at the time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Which subsection of s.5 of the Theft act states that property needs to be dealt with according to the wishes of the owner to avoid Theft?

A

s.5 (3)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was the outcome of Davidge v Bunnett and what does it come under?

A

Davidge v Bunnett: s.5(3) Theft act - belonging to another + deal with the property in a certain way
D took the money V gave him to pay for bills and spent it on Christmas presents
HELD: the money was still in possession of the owner and D should’ve dealt with it as he wished.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the situations in which D will be liable for theft in s5(4)

A
  1. Given extra change after a sale

2. Given extra wages under a contract of employment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the first part of the MR of Theft and which section does it come under?

A

s.2 - Dishonesty

17
Q

Which scenarios would lead the D not to be dishonest?

A
  1. If he believes he has a legal right to the property
  2. If he believes the owner would’ve allowed him to have the property (Holden)
  3. If he believes the owner could not be found after taking reasonable steps
18
Q

What was the outcome of Holden and what does it come under?

A

Holden: s.2 Theft act - Dishonest
D was told that the workers could take the tires home from kwikfit
HELD: D believed the owner (kwikfit) would have allowed him to take the property so there was no dishonesty

19
Q

What was the outcome of Ivy v Genting Casinos and what does it come under?

A

Ivy v Genting Casinos: s.2 Theft act - Dishonesty
D used dishonest gambling methods to take money from the casino
HELD: that the reasonable man would regard his actions as being dishonest

20
Q

What is the Ivy test for dishonesty?

A

“Would the reasonable man regard D’s actions as dishonest?” (Objective)

21
Q

What is the second element of the MR of Theft and which section does it fall under?

A

Intention to permanently deprive - s.6 Theft act 1968

22
Q

What was the outcome of Velumyl and what does it come under?

A

Velumyl: s.6 Theft act - ITPD
He took money from a safe and then returned it when he had won it back
HELD The original notes were still taken to there was and intent to permanently deprive the owner of the original notes

23
Q

What was the outcome of Lloyd and what does it come under?

A

Lloyd: s.6 Theft act - ITPD
D took a film reel from the cinema and copied it several times, before returning it after he had finished
HELD: There was no ITPD and so D could not be liable for theft

24
Q

What is conditional intent (Theft ITPD)

A

Conditional intent involves the D looking if there are any items worth stealing -this is not a theft as there is not yet an ITDP

25
Q

What was the outcome of Easom and what does it come under?

A

Easom: s.6 theft act - ITPD
D rummaged around in a bag but stole nothing
HELD D had conditional intent but did not take property, so it could not be proven there was an ITPD

26
Q

What type of offence is robbery?

A

Indictable

27
Q

What is the maximum sentence for robbery?

A

Life

28
Q

What section of the Theft act 1968 defines Theft?

A

s.8 Theft act 1968

29
Q

What is the definition of theft in s.8 Theft act 1968

A

“A person is guilty of robbery if he steals and immediately before or at the time of doing so, he uses force on any person or puts or seeks to put any person in fear of being subjected to force”

30
Q

What is the first element of the actus reus of robbery?

A

“Steals”

31
Q

What was the outcome of Corcoran v Anderton and what does it come under?

A

Corcoran v Anderton: s.8 Theft act - “Steals”
D tried to steal a handbag but dropped it after attempting to escape
HELD: Liable as it is not necessary for the D to ‘get away’ with the property

32
Q

What is the second element of the AR of Robbery?

A

“Force or threat of force”

33
Q

What was the outcome of Dawson and James and what does it come under?

A

Dawson and James: s.8 theft act 1968
D nudged V so that their wallet was more easily accessible
HELD: Force can be indirect

34
Q

What was the outcome of P v DPP and what does it come under?

A

P v DPP: s.8 Theft act - “force”
D took a cigarette from V’s mouth
HELD: The

35
Q

What was the outcome of Morris and what does it come under?

A