A) Error sources in experimental research Flashcards
two main sources of bias we need to control for
- extranous variables
- confounding variables
extranous variables
extra variables that are also varying adding noise in our data (eg ppt doing a cognitive test at different times, differences in lighting or differences in ability) this type of variable adds unsystematic variation in the data (adds noise)
confounding variables
other variables that vary between our conditions (eg getting everyone in one group to take part in morning and everyone in the second group to take part in the evening). this type of variable adds systematic variation in the data (can cause ambiguous effect)
example of a variable that adds systematic variation
confounding variables
example of a variable that adds unsystematic variation
extraneous variables
what is an unsystematic error caused by
- caused by all things that are varying other than manipulation, eg ppt mood, differences in ability, condition variations etc
- unsystematic variance cannot be totally removed, all we can do it make the experiment powerful enough to overcome it.
how can we combat effects of unsystematic (random) error
- create more powerful manipulation (eg increase dosage of nicotine administered)
- testing large number of people
- using matched-pairs design
what is a systematic error causes by
where we have a systematic bias between two groups that may affect the results (make it appear that there is. difference when there isn’t one, or no difference when there is one)
eg one group taking experiment outside in noisy place, second group indoors in quite room
makes it harder to interpret the difference between conditions (is the difference due to manipulation or the confound?)
4 ways to control for confounding variables
-standardisation
-randomisation
-counterbalancing
-blind design
standardisation meaning in terms of controlling confounding variable
to ensure environmental condition do not systematically vary between groups
randomisation meaning in terms of controlling confounding variable
to ensure participants are split between groups without bias
counterbalancing meaning in terms of controlling confounding variable
to avoid order (practise or fatigue) effects
blind design meaning in terms of controlling confounding variable
to prevent the ppts (and researchers) expectations from confounding your results
quasi experiment
comparing groups eg boys and girls, or individuals with developmental disorders to a neurotypical population
natural experiment
comparing naturally occurring situations eg comparing individuals that have gown up in care to those who have not or those with a single parent to those with both parents etc