9 Mark Theories Flashcards
outline the theory of the multi-store model
- Attention Rehearsal
Sensory —>Short Term —> Long Term
Memory —> Memory
-sensory memory: capacity: large. encoding: visually, semantically and acoustically. duration: fraction of a second. for info from the sensory memory to get into STM we must pay attention to it.
-STM: capacity: 5-9 items. encoding: visually and acoustically. duration: 30 seconds. rehearsal moves information from the STM to LTM
-LTM: capacity: unlimited .encoding: semantically. duration: lifetime.
what is a strength of the multi-store model theory
*research support
P- support for the existence of different memory stores
E- Baddeley’s study of encoding shows that STM and LTM encode information differently
L-STM and LTM have qualitative differences
what is a weakness of the multi-store model theory
*simple
P- too simple as it suggests we only have 1 STM and 1 LTM
E-research shows that STM is divided into visual and acoustic stores and that LTM is divided into semantic, procedural and episodic
L- memory is more complex
what is a weakness of the multi-store model theory
*artificial materials
P- research uses artificial materials
E- eg. word lists and nonsense syllables
L- doesn’t illustrate the different ways we use memory
outline the theory of reconstructive memory
- memory is an active process. we store fragments of information and when we need to recall something we build these fragments into a meaningful whole however some elements are missing and is not accurate
- we record small pieces of information when events occur. later during recall we recombine the pieces to tell the story, every time we retell the story the elements are combined differently (reconstruction)
- when recombining pieces of information they can be impacted to what we believe to be true therefore social and cultural expectations may influence our memory
- effort after meaning: we focus on the meaning of events and afterwards we make an effort to interpret the meaning in more familiar terms
what is a weakness the theory of reconstructive memory
*some memories are accurate
P- wrong to suggest all memories are inaccurate
E- other studies have shown that sometimes memory can be accurate. (eg. in Bartlett’s war of the ghosts study people remembered the phrase “something black came out of his mouth” because it was distinctive)
L- shows that people don’t always actively construct memories and that some memories are accurate
what is a strength the theory of reconstructive memory
*realistic
P- Bartlett’s way of investigating memory reflects how we use memory in everyday life
E- he had his participants learn a story rather than using artificial tasks like word lists
L- therefore his research is more relevant to real-life memory processes
what is a strength the theory of reconstructive memory
*eye witness testimony
P- can explain issues with eye witness testimony
E- eye witness testimonies used to be regarded as important/valuable evidence however, Bartlett showed that our memory isn’t always accurate and can be affected by our expectations. due to this it is no longer heavily relied on
L- shows that Bartlett’s research had important consequences
outline Gibson’s theory of direct perception
NATURE
- perceptual abilities are innate
- direct perception: perceive using the information we receive through our senses, no need to make inferences from past experience (sufficient info for perception)
- no difference between perception and sensation
- affordances: use of an object can be perceived directly without past experience of it
- optic flow: allows us to know when we’re moving (make judgements about speed and distance), point we’re moving towards remains stationary and the rest of the view seems to push away from it
- motion parallax: helps us understand the speed of our movements , objects closer to us appear to be moving faster than objects further in the distance
- optic array (everything we can see) gives us all the information we need to be able to judge depth, distance and movement
- don’t need to learn to perceive the world around us. the environment around us is rich with information and our eyes are sophisticated enough to perceive it
what is a strength of Gibson’s theory of direct perception
*pilots
P- supported by research with pilots
E- when he worked for the US Army Air Force he found that all the information he needed to land a plane was the pattern of light that reached the eye
L- real world relevance, explains how we perceive the world around us on a daily basis
what is a strength of Gibson’s theory of direct perception
*young infants
P- the research being done on young infants provides good support
E- tested on very young children so its unlikely that their reluctance to crawl over the edge was something they learnt
L- shows that some perceptual abilities are due to nature and don’t need past experience to perceive the world
what is a weakness of Gibson’s theory of direct perception
*perceptual errors
P- perceptual errors aren’t easily explained
E- visual illusions are good examples of when we make perceptual errors and draw wrong conclusions about what we’re looking at, Gibson argues that what you see is what you get but illusions show that perception and sensation are separate processes
L- he doesn’t explain this so his research is limited
outline Gregory’s constructivist theory of perception
NURTURE
- stimuli in our environment are frequently ambiguous so for us to interpret it we need to access knowledge stored in our brain and makes inferences about what we perceive
- perception was influenced by past experiences
- constructivist theory: idea that we make sense of the world by building up our perceptions based on incoming data and clues we know about the world
- inferences: taking info and forming a conclusion about what it means based on other things you know
- nurture: refers to the aspects of behaviour that are acquired through experience
- mistaken hypothesis: where our brain draws the wrong conclusion from available evidence
- past experience: our understanding of visual cues is learned from experience. our perception becomes more sophistic as we grow older and interact more with the world around us. the way we’re raised can have a big influence of on our perception
what is a strength of Gregory’s constructivist theory of perception
*cultural differences
P- support from studies investigating cultural differences in perception
E- people in different parts of the world interpret visual cues differently (cultures with higher levels of schooling were better judges of depth)
L-: “nurture” effects our perception and our prior knowledge influences how we interpret objects
what is a weakness of Gregory’s constructivist theory of perception
*not usual perception
P- good explanation of illusions but its not our usual perception
E- illusions are designed to fool us
L- therefore not a good explanation of how we perceive objects every day
what is a weakness of Gregory’s constructivist theory of perception
*driven by nature
P- can’t explain how perception can be driven by nature
E- research shows that babies prefer human faces compare to random patterns from birth (before they received environmental input)
L- not all perception is a result of nurture, if culture was so influential we’d expect to see more differences in culture
outline Piaget’s theory of cognitive development
Theory:
-changes in thinking (cognition) over time (as we get older)
-children think differently from adults
Stages:-young children aren’t able to think logically about the world (brains aren’t mature enough)
-as the child gets older their brain develops and different kinds of thinking such as being able to think in abstract ways
Schemas:
-the world is represented in the mind where knowledge is stored
-as the child develops the construct more and more detailed and complex schemas
-number of schemas increase as we grow older through assimilation and accommodation
Assimilation:
when we we understand a new experience and add that new information to a new schema
Accommodation:
receiving new information that changes our understanding so a new schema is formed
what is a strength of Piaget’s theory of cognitive development
*a lot of research
P- enormous amount of research (evidence) to test his ideas
E- many studies have been conducted to test Piaget’s theory
L- we can be more certain about what aspects of his theory need refining which has helped improve our understanding of how children’s thinking develops
what is a weakness of Piaget’s theory of cognitive development
*sample
P- his research involved middle class European children E- children were in European academic families who valued academic abilities, in other social classes/cultures a greater value may be placed on a more basic level of concrete operations (eg.making things rather than abstract ideas) L- theory may not be universally applicable
what is a strength of Piaget’s theory of cognitive development
*real world application
P- has real world application
E- the theory has helped change classroom teaching so it’s now more activity based
L- demonstrates it’s positive value (usefulness)
outline Dweck’s mindset theory
mindset: set of assumptions we have–> affects success
Fixed Mindset:
-abilities/talent is fixed in their genes
-aren’t doing well , give up
-no amount of effort will change the situation
-focused on performance goals (doing well=feel good)
Growth Mindset:
-can improve with effort
-enjoy challenges
-focused on learning goals (working hard=feel good)
Dealing with failure:
-fixed: failure indicates lack of talent=give up
-growth: opportunity to learn more and put in more effort
Continuum:
-people are a mixture (not just one or the other)
-depends on the situation
what is a strength of Dweck’s mindset theory
*research evidence
P- research evidence shows that a growth mindset leads to better grades
E- Dweck found that children taught a growth mindset had better grades and motivation
L- shows that a growth mindset can be taught and can improve performance
what is a weakness of Dweck’s mindset theory
*involves praise
P- any sort of praise may be damaging
E- praising effort can still lead to doing things for approval from others rather than self satisfaction which can discourage independent behaviour
L- praise of effort may not be the best way to motivate learners
what is a strength of Dweck’s mindset theory
*real world application
P- has real world application
E- in business, sport and relationships ect. seeing failure as a lack of effort rather than talent motivates future effort
L- shows the positive value