9. Equitable Remedies Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Mixed funds - property bought with trust’s and trustees money.

A

Beneficiaries have first claim over property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Mixed funds - property bought with money from two different trusts.

A

Two trusts share property pro rata

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Mixed funds - property bought with money from trust and innocent volunteer.

A

Trusts and innocent volunteer share the property pro rata

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Can you trace into an overdrawn account?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Trustee mixes B’s money with his own - rule in Re Hallett

A

Presume that the wrongdoing trustee has done the right thing and spent his own money first

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Trustee mixes B’s money with his own and buys property - rule in Re Oatway

A

Innocent beneficiary can “cherry-pick” between whether to trace into an assets acquired with mixed funds. Can pick the most profitable.

  • except where it would prejudicially affect 3rd parties (ie. unsecured creditors)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Lower intermediate balance rule

A

Claimant cannot trace into later deposited money; maximum claimable amount is the lowest intermediate balance following the original deposit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

T mixing money of two trusts - Clayton’s rule first in, and first out” rule”

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

If T paid £3000 of trust’s money into an account w/ £1,000 overdraft, how much will a beneficiary be able to trace back?

A

Lower Intermediary balance rule applies = claim is limited to recovering £2,000.
- no tracing where there is an overdraft.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Coordinate scheme exception

A

exception to general rule of no backward tracing where defendant took deliberate steps to defeat tracing.
- applied in complex fraud cases.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Subrogation

A

where trustee uses trust money to pay off a debt.
- allows beneficiary to revive security/step in creditor’s shoes = treating them as if they loaned they money.

  • ie. if T paid off his house mortgage, then B could revive mortgage and claim security over the house (proportionate to value of claim). Most beneficial in secured debt scenarios.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Is partial subrogation possible?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Is subrogation possible even where debt was paid off by a third-party?

A

Yes - Menelaou v Bank of Cyprus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Five key requirements for tracing

A
  1. fiduciary relationship
  2. claimant w/ equitable proprietary interest
  3. property is traceable
  4. would no produce inequitable outcome
  5. no unreasonable delay in bringing claim
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Change of position defence

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Trustee mixing funds from two different trusts - ‘first in, and out’ rule

A

Presumption that the first trust money paid into the mixed account was the first to have been dissipated (or used to purchase an asset).

Note:
- presumption = rebuttable!

17
Q

Difference between following and tracing

A

process of following simply tracks down the same asset, whereas of tracing, misappropriated trust property has been substituted.

18
Q

Bona fide purchaser defence

A

Defeats beneficiary’s proprietary claim over any asset purchased by a third-party w/ out notice of its provenance. Cannot trace.

19
Q

Benefits of a proprietary claim (cf. personal one)

A

1) not affected by defendant’s bankruptcy/insolvency
2) allows beneficiaries to capture increases in value of traceable proceeds.
3) no need to establish fault on any party’s part

20
Q

Exceptions where rule in Clayton’s Case (first in/out) can be misapplied

A

(see Barlow v Vaughan)
- contrary to parties’ intention when contributing to the mixture
- impracticable
- unfair

21
Q

Barlow v Vaughan - exception to Clayton’s rule

A

Investors paid money into large investment scheme.
- rule would have not left enough money to meet all of the claims.
- Held = all parties were victims of “common misfortune”
- contrary to their intentions when first investing in scheme that first contributing parties should have priority over later ones.

22
Q

Trustee mixing funds from two different trusts - alternatives to Clayton’s rule

A

Innocent beneficiaries’ claims are proportionate to fractional value of their contributions to mixture.

23
Q
A