9 - Employment And Inflation: EAPC Flashcards
Supporters of the competitive net-classical model considered what
Government intervention as problematic
- Instead believed self-regulating free market would generate optimal outcomes (full employment)
EAPC
Group of economists (the monetarists) asserted that: 3 things
- No permanent (long-run) trade-off between inflation and unemployment
- The market would ensure unemployment rate was stable around its so-called natural rate
- Attempts by Government to push unemployment rate below its so-called natural rate would lead to accelerating inflation (accelerationist hypothesis)
Government can reduce what in the short run, however it’ll eventually return back to its natural rate in the long run
Unemployment rate
When was the accelerationist hypothesis advanced and by who
1968 by Milton Friedman
2 basic propositions that Friedman asserted in his attack on the Phillips Curve
- Natural rate of unemployment (NRU)
- Price expectations
According to Friedman, like the classics, what was the relevant object of concern from the perspective of firms and workers
Real wage was the concern, over money wage
- In classical labour market, workers supplied labour based on the price of leisure (I.e. the real wage)
- If money wage (nominal) Increased, and inflation increased, then real wage has stayed the same
Should accept the job if there’s an increase in what during inflation
Real wage
Firms hiring rule for profit maximisation
Keep hiring workers until you reach the point where the output of the worker (marginal product) equals the cost of the worker (real wage) to profit maximise
For Friedman, Phillips Curve is, at best, a what
A short run relationship that can only be exploited as long as workers suffer from money illusion
What is money illusion
When people believe a money wage increase or price increase represents a real increase
- In other words they ignore or underestimate inflation
If price level increases and money wage increases the same amount there’ll be no motivation to do what
No motivation or incentive to hire people
Difference between price expectations in PC and EAPC
There’s no role for price expectations in the Phillips Curve, but there is in the Expectations Augmented Phillips Curve
When do we have incentive and motivation to hire people
If inflation rate increases more than money wage (decrease in real wage) as the firm is getting profit by selling at higher price but the costs haven’t increased as much
- Example, inflation rate increases by 2% and money wage (nominal wage) Increase 1%, then overall decrease in real wage
Why shouldn’t people accept the job offer but they do anyway
Because real wage has decreased, however they don’t know what happened to the price level (inflation), they only recognise the change in money wage (nominal), Therefore overall they thing their real wage has improved which isn’t the case, as they ignore the change in price level, which is called money illusion, misleading expectation
Summarise money illusion and accepting job offer
Overall, firm increase money (nominal) wage, but not as much as price level (inflation), therefore more profit, as people ignore the rise in price level (inflation), accepting job offer, decreasing unemployment
- Short-run