9 Bidding & Contract Negotiation Flashcards
List the contract form & type of const. delivery for each:
CCDC 2
CCDC 3a
CCDC 3b
CCDC 4
CCDC 5
DOC 14
CCDC 2
- Stipulated Price Contract
- Design-Bid-Build
CCDC 3a
- Cost Plus Contract (% or fixed fee)
- Design-Bid-Build
CCDC 3b
- Cost Plus Contract (guaranteed max. price)
- Time & Materials
CCDC 4
- Unit Price Contract
- Max Upset Price
CCDC 5
- Canadian Standard CM Contract Form btwn O CM
- Construction Management
DOC 14
- Design-Build Stip. Price Contract
- Design-Build
List the 4 main types of project delivery:
- Design-Bid-Build
- Construction Management
- Design-Build
- Public Private Partnership (p3)
List the advantages of a design-bid-build project: (5)
- common/familiar
- clear roles
- transparent
- design resolution prior to constr.
- direct professional relationship w O & A
List the disadvantages of a design-bid-build project:
- no constr. input during design
- O see more ‘extras’
- GC unknown during design/CDs
- Contracts (Public - go to low bid)
Why would an Owner add a CM to the team? (3)
to oversee:
- schedule
- cost
- construction method
What does the organizational structure of Design-Build project w Bridging look like?
What are the 2 phases of a Design Build project delivery method.
-
Phase 1 Design Builder (DB) provides design within budget
- may be in competition with other DBs
-
Phase 2 Stip-Price Contract
- may include a cost plus fee agreement
- savings accrue to owner
When & why is the P3 project delivery method used?
USE: Very large infrastructure projects
or bundles of smaller projects of the same type
WHY: Private can administer more efficiently /quickly than public
What are the advantages of a P3 project delivery method? (5)
- uses efficiencies & expertise of private sector
- life cycle costs reduced if operated by private
- single point of responsibility
- reduced time /const. sched
- design often deciding factor in proposal selection
What are the disadvantages of a P3 project delivery method? (5)
- transfers risk to private sector
- ‘best value’ not always acheived (more like best$$)
- lack of communication btwn O and A
- building users have less control over outcome
- prof liability ins. hard to get (particularly for small firms)
Who should seriously consider using a ‘bridging’ or ‘advocate’ architect on a design-build project?
Less sophisticated Owners, who do not have in-house architectural, engineering or
project management expertise
What are the 3 possible roles for a CM and their corresponding contract forms?
-
CM as Advisor - CCDC 5a
- O contracts each of the 3 parties separately
- higher administrative costs
- can confuse roles & responsibilities
-
CM as Agent - CCDC 5b
- O contract w CM who directly engages Prime and GC on behalf of O
- construction risk not know until end
- risk flows to owner
-
CM as Constructor
- hired prior to completion of design
- shifts all risk to GC
- typ. more expensive
What are the advantages of a design-build project delivery method? (3)
- single point of responsibility
- typically faster than traditional method
- In DB competition, GC more motivated to provide cost savings /value
What are some disadvantages of the Design-Build project delivery method?
- cost savings could be in conflict w building quality & maintenance costs
- More complex process than CM
- The owner is disconnected from the DB Architect
- More risk than CM
- Architects & engineers are disconnected from owner
- Too difficult /costly for one-off building types
*w bridging:
CM is often faster
What project delivery method often takes the name ‘Project Management’?
CM as Agent (representing Owner)