9/13 - Clinical Implant Provisionals, Implant Provisional Lab, Custom Tray Fabrication Flashcards
are implant provisionals implant-borne or tissue borne
implant borne
what are materials used for implant provisionals
- plastic of titanium temporary/provisional abutment
- acrylic (Jet or Trim)
- Bis-acryle (integrity)
- composite
- denture tooth
advantages of implant provisionals
- fixed
- tissue support
- identify implant and/or angulation problems
disadvantages of implant provisionals
- esthetic challenges (immediate/early)
- no removal during healing (immediate/early)
- implant vulnerability (immediate/early)
- no functional contribution (immediate/early)
- increased cost
what teeth do we provisionalize at creighton
anteriors
what are implant provisionals intended for
- post-surgical healing
- soft tissue development
- patient management
- predict prosthetic form/contour
- identify implant angulation problems
- evaluate questionable implants
when are implant provisionalization protocols IMMEDIATE
implants placed in function within 1 week of placement
when are implant provisionalization protocols EARLY
implant in function between 1 week and 2 months after placement
when are implant provisionalization protocols CONVENTIONAL/DELAYED
implant in function after 2 months healing
what situations are immediate implant provisionals used
in situations when:
- adequate primary stability
- no centric, eccentric, or protrusive contacts
- esethetic gain outweights risks associated w/ immediage loading protocols
- patient compliance w/ protocols
what is it called when the initial fixation of implant is sufficiently strong to withstand disloding forces
primary stability
what are examples of how primary stability is mechanical in nature
- osteotomy
- bone density
- implant geometry
- thread pattern
when is primary stability a MUST
in cases of immediate loading
as primary stability decreases, what happens to cumulative and secondary stability?
cumulative stability slightly decreases then maintains plateau
secondary stability increases
at creighton, when are implants considered progressive or delayed
after osteointegration
at what weeks is the implant most vulnerable to forces and must be avoid removal of provisional
2-4 weeks (15-21 days)
what can we do to test if implant is stable
- insertion/removal torque values
- periotest
- resonance frequence analysis (RFA) expressed as ISQ
what does RFA stand for
resonance frequency analysis
does denser bone have lower or higher insertion torque values
HIGHER
how does periotest work
a probe w/ accelerometer is placed on implant and calculates the contact time between the implant and probe
what does periotest correlate to
- micromovement
- variability
- lack of standardized values
what does RFA measure
interfacial integrity between implant and bone
what does RFA correlate with
implant bone contact and is expressed as ISQ
what does ISQ range from? what is the acceptable range? meaning what?
range from 1-100, acceptable is 55-85 meaning it has osseointegrated
what test provides variable results and interpretation of values
RFA
when are we unable to do implant provisional
- lack of primary stability
- parafunctional habits
- unable to eliminate centric/eccentric/protrusive contacts
- non-compliant patient
- non-esthetic zone
- esthetic gain does not outweigh risk of implant complications
when is prosthesis attached due to conventional loading
2 months post-implant placement (wait until implant osseointegrated)
when is conventional loading used
- sinus/ridge augmentation required
- compromised primary stability
- occlusal forces/parafunction
advantages of conventional loading
- ossointegrated implant
- tissue sculpting
- esthetics
- functional loading
disadvantages of conventional loading
- removable interim provisional
- lack tissue support during healing
can you add and subtract material on provisional to sculpt tissue
YES
what is the goal of soft tissue development
gingival symmetry with adjacent teeth
what is OPTIMAL corono-apical position of implant
3-4 mm apical to proposed CEJ
what corono-apical position of the implant is difficult to clean and manage deep sulcus?
> 5 mm apical to proposed CEJ
what corono-apical position of implant is unesthetic and results in short crown?
<3 mm apical to proposed CEJ