8.2a Constitutional Reform (1997-2010) Flashcards
Demand for Reform
Demand for reform came from a broad range of groups who wanted to modernise British institutions and a growing distrust in traditional institutions.
There were also growing demands for devolution to Scotland and to fix the problems in Northern Ireland.
When New Labour came to power in 1997 under the leadership of Tony Blair they promised wide ranging constitutional reforms.
There is still debate about whether these reforms went far enough.
House of Lords Act 1999
The House of Lords Act 1999 removed all but 92 hereditary peers.
The Lords became a mainly appointed chamber, with peers appointed based on merit as opposed to by birth with the removal of most hereditary peers.
House of Lords Reform: Did Enough I
No one party has a majority.
An unelected house means that experts can be appointed.
For example, Lord Norton, a politics professor and constitutional expert.
People who can represent underrepresented groups in society can be appointed. Lord Bird (ex-homeless man and founder of the Big Issue) represents homeless people, a group who often go unrepresented.
House of Lords Reform: Lfe Peerages
Life peerages mean that peers don’t have to worry about election or removal from office if they make decisions that are unpopular with their party or a small group of constituents.
Life peerages mean that Lords can, therefore, consider the long-term interests of the country.
House of Lords Reform: More reform is needed
There are still 92 hereditary peers – an idea that is outdated in a meritocratic society.
There are 26 Bishops but no representation for other religions.
Party leaders still make political appointments to the House of Lords.
The House of Lords remains unelected despite having influence over lawmaking and being able to hold the government to account.
House of Lords Reform: More reform is needed
It is very large and very costly – over 800 peers – making it the second largest legislative chamber in the world.
The 2017 Burns report called for a reduction in the size of the House of Lords and for term limits of members.
Devolution:
In 1998 the Scotland Act, Northern Ireland Act and Government of Wales Act established the Scottish Parliament, Northern Ireland Assembly and Welsh Assembly.
There had been a growing demand for Scottish independence and a need to unite the unionist and nationalist parties in Northern Ireland.
Devolution: Did Enough
The Good Friday agreement and devolution to the Northern Ireland Assembly transformed the situation in Northern Ireland.
Until the collapse of the power-sharing agreement in January 2017 the two main parties had been working together.
Although there are calls for more devolution to England, when a referendum was held on the idea of an elected regional assembly for the north east of England the idea was rejected.
Devolution: Wales
There have been multiple pieces of legislation devolving further powers to Wales since 1998, in 2006, 2014 and 2017.
One of the reasons for this increased demand is the imbalance in the powers given in 1998 when Wales gained fewer powers than Scotland.
The Welsh nationalist movement has been growing and demand for further devolution continues.
Devolution: Scotland
Devolution did not stem the demand for Scottish independence.
In 2014 there was a Scottish independence referendum which was only narrowly won by the unionists. The Scottish National Party are now much more popular and electorally successful than in 1998.
There has also been further devolution to Scotland in 2016.
Devolution: Northern Ireland
Since the 2016 EU referendum there have been ongoing discussions over how Brexit will work for Northern Ireland as it shares a border with the Republic of Ireland (an EU member).
The Northern Ireland Act 1998 will need to be amended as part of the Brexit process, causing possible conflict in Ireland.
Devolution: More devolution needed
It is argued that more devolution of powers to England is needed.
The West Lothian question is the problem of Scottish MPs being able to vote in the House of Commons on matters that only affect England whilst English MPs have no say in devolved Scottish Matters.
The Barnett formula is used to determine the amount of funding per head given to each part of the UK and is out of date as it was devised in 1978.
The formula means that Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland receive more money per head than England.
Human Rights Act
The 1998 Human Rights Act (HRA) incorporated the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) into UK law.
The freedoms contained in the ECHR include the freedoms to life, to a fair trial, of expression and from discrimination among many others.
The ECHR requires states to hold free and fair elections, abolish the death penalty, preserve family life and give foreigners the same rights as all citizens in a state.
HRA: Supreme Court
The Human Rights Act (HRA) means that any public body cannot act in a way that would break with the convention and that the judiciary must make rulings that are compatible with it.
The Supreme Court can strike down secondary legislation that is incompatible with the HRA, but for primary legislation they can only issue a ‘Doctrine of Incompatibility’ urging parliament to change the statute, this is due to the principle of parliamentary sovereignty.
HRA: Did Enough
The fundamental rights of all British Citizens are very clearly laid out in one easily accessible piece of legislation.
There was an 8-fold increase in the number of human rights cases and claims brought to the high court after the Human Rights Act was passed.