8.1 - The Impact of the Supreme Court on Legislative and Policy-Making Processes Flashcards
What is the Supreme Court?
The highest court of appeal in the UK.
How many people are in the Supreme Court?
12.
Who does the judiciary represent?
The courts and judges.
Why are judgements reached in senior courts more important?
They can set legal precedents that can be referred to in subsequent cases.
Who works out how laws interact in the real world?
Parliament makes the laws.
The judges decide how they actually work in the real world.
Why are the judiciary arguably more important for legislation than Acts of Parliament?
‘Whoever hath the absolute authority to interpret any written or spoken laws, it is he who is truly the lawgiver and not the person who first wrote or spake them’.
What provides the basis for English Common Law?
How senior judges interpret Acts of Parliament and resolve cases creates legal precedent.
Why are decisions of the supreme court supremely (haha) important?
The decisions it reaches must be followed in future cases.
What used to be the highest court of appeal prior to the Supreme Court?
The Lords.
Which Lords acted as the highest court of appeal?
The 12 Law Lords in the Appellate Committee.
Why were the Lords split from the judiciary?
Having the Lords also act as as the highest court of appeal breached the principle of the ‘separation of powers’.
Who split the Lords from the Judiciary?
Blair.
When did Blair split the Lords from the Judiciary?
The Constitutional Reform Act 2005.
What replaced the Appellate Committee?
The Supreme Court.
Why is the supreme court better than the previous appellate committee?
- Separates powers.
- More open to public scrutiny.
How far does the jurisdiction of the supreme court reach?
Across the whole UK and is the highest court of appeal for all civil cases.
Final court of appeal in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. In Scotland, the High Court of the Justiciary fulfils this role.
How does the Supreme Court hold the government to account?
There is a judicial review on how the government has acted.
How is Supreme Court membership decided?
Five-member selection commission made of the most senior judges in the UK.
Then passed to justice secretary who has the opportunity to reject a nomination.
Then passed to the monarch to make the appointment.
Why is it vital that justices of the supreme court are independent?
Decisions should be reached on the principles of justice, rather than political pressure.
Why do some criticise the supreme court?
The privileged nature of the justices make it unlikely to reflect the way in which law interacts with modern society.
How is the Supreme Court unrepresentative?
Mostly men, who have been privately educated and then attended Oxbridge.
What does the social status of judges tend to mean about case decisions?
They tend to favour (hmm..) the establishment.
How does the government still retain some political influence over the appointment of justices?
The justice secretary does not need a legal background, yet has the power to reject a nominee.
How can the Supreme Court be pulled into politics?
In cases concerning major political disputes, the neutrality of the court could be argued.