8 - Kin selection Flashcards
In altruism, can you completely give up all of your fitness?
No, giving up all reproductive success would not evolve by natural selection. Though, you can give up individual reproductive success in lieu of kin genes being passed on.
Kin selection
True or false? Altruism ends up with a net benefit to the altruist
Usually true. For this system to work, an altruist must be surrounded by other altruists.
If a population has altruists and non altruists, how can it work based on the proportion of interactions?
Altruists must interact with other altruists more than non-altruists interact with altruists (eg. if care is more likely to be directed to individuals with altuism)
Having altruism must be preductuve of the recipient having altruism too
What is Hamilton’s rule?
According to Hamilton’s rule, kin selection causes genes to increase in frequency when the genetic relatedness of a recipient to an actor multiplied by the benefit to the recipient is greater than the reproductive cost to the actor.
What is a formula that is good for expressing Hamilton’s rule?
rb > c
(relatedness)(benefit) is greater than (cost)
r = coefficient of relatedness
What is the coefficient of relatedness (r) for:
- parents/offspring
- siblings
- Parents give half their genes to each their offspring (r = .5)
- Full siblings (r = (.5x.5) + (.5x.5) = .5)
- Half siblings (r = (.5x.5) = .25)
- First cousins are related through grandparents (.5^4 + .5^4 = .125)
You can figure any of these out from r = Σ(0.5)^L
- Where L = the number of parent-offspring (generational) links
Kin selection is not just about altruism, what is it?
Selection for traits that increase the survival of close relatives including offspring and non-descendant kin.
What is direct fitness?
Fitness gained by increased survival of offspring because of the individual’s actions.
What is indirect fitness?
Fitness gained by increasing survival of non-descendant kin because of your actions.
What are the two fitness components of kin selection?
- Direct fitness
- Indirect fitness
(inclusive fitness = some of it from your own offspring, some from other’s offspring)
Is calling when predators near more likely when there are:
- no close relatives
- Only non descendant close relatives
- Only offspring
- No close relatives (least likely to call)
- Only non descendant close relatives
- Only offspring (most likely to call)
How do animals know that there’s kin around (differential behaviour towards kin/non kin driven by kin recognition)?
- Social learning (growing up with certain individuals), siblings/non-siblings raised together less likely to get in fight than those raised apart).
- Phenotype matching (eg. olfactory, rearing together barely helps toleration to non-kin)
Having altruism must be predictive of the recipient having altruism too.
How is this possible? (3)
- If altruists interact repeatedly (reciprocity)
- If altruism occur in groups (group selection)
- If altruists are related (kin selection)
Describe how you can calculate the coefficient of relatibility (r) for first cousins.
Cousins = L=4 (1 for parent, 1 for grandparent, 1 for aunt, 1 for cousin)
Cousin 1 = (.5)^4 = .0625
Cousin 2 = (.5)^4 = .0625
0.0625 + 0.0625 = .125
r = .125
What is inclusive fitness?
The direct fitness gained by increased survival of offspring, due to individual’s actions AND the indirect fitness gained by increased survival of non-descendent kin because of the individuals actions
An essential component in explaining kin selection