8. Impact Of Fin Prod Innov On Ret Plans Flashcards
Several factors have come together that focus on the need to help older workers convert their DC ret plans to periodic income. What are some of the factors? (6)
- A study by the GAO highlighted: ~2/3rds of older workers’ plans don’t have payout options intended to last a lifetime; ~3/4ths don’t offer annuities
- A bipartisan policy report by a nonprofit group recommended: lifetime income options should be added to DC plans
- Regulatory developments are enabling the use of ret income sol’ns in tax-qualified DC plans
- Surveys indicate: older workers need & want help with developing ret income
- The DOL issued regs that req’d fin advisors & institutions that provide advice re: tax-qualified ret acts to act as fiduciaries. Tho these regs were ultimately rescinded, such action caused some market participants to embrace a fiduciary approach
- Reports show ERs & fin insts can construct ret programs in DC plans and demonstrate analytical techs they can use to help them design the programs.
What are the major challenges older workers confront when they need to convert their DC plan assets to periodic lifetime income? (6)
- Ret savings may need to last anywhere from 20-30+ yrs
- Market volatility adds another level of complexity to the task of managing savings in ret
- Many older workers are unable to accurately calc the amount of savings needed to generate lifetime income
- Not many retirees have a formal strategy for how to draw down savings
- Many older workers with moderate savings don’t have access to skilled, unbiased fin advisors, or may not know how to ID & select them
- Older workers looking for ret income sol’ns face a rapidly evolving marketplace that is difficult to navigate
List 5 typical retirement goals
- Desire for liquidity to meet emergencies
- Maximize expected ret income
- Income doesn’t decrease due to capital market volatility
- Income keeps up w inflation
- Income that retiree cannot outlive
The Society of Actuaries (SOA) and the Stanford Center on Longevity (SCL) collab’d to produce a study that provides an analytical framework for planning ret income. What were the (6) key results?
- There is a distinct, quantifiable trade off bt liquidity & maximizing income
- For most retirees, using a portion of ret savings to delay SS benefits increases expected total lifetime income & helps protect surviving spouses
- Once a retiree achieves a basic level of guaranteed income, optimal solutions should significantly invest remaining assets in equities
- RMDs can be a reasonable sol’n that can be implemented with ease by plan sponsors & retirees
- Funds fully allocated to TDFs right up to retirement render older workers vulnerable to market crashes
- Combo sol’ns that generate income from invested assets until an advanced age with qualified longevity annuity contracts (QLACs) delivering income thereafter can be difficult to implement as a “set and forget” sol’n.
The SOA/SCL research project supports a ret income menu design with at least 3 distinct retirement income generator (RIG) options:
- A systematic withdrawal program from invested assets in the plan
- Guaranteed, lifetime annuities offered by an insurance company
- A temporary payout from plan assets that enables delaying SS benefits in order to increase total ret income
Plan sponsors that want to help retirees convert DC plan assets to ret income while recognizing their fiduciary duties will want to conduct a due diligence process that includes which (5) steps?
- Assess the needs & abilities of their older workers
- Learn about various RIGs, including the ret planning goals each RIG addresses, their dis/advantages, & how much income can be reasonably expected
- Learn about the capabilities, costs, & comms support that can be provided by their existing plan admin, & the capabilities of alt vendors
- Develop criteria for the design of the ret income program, and assess how each potential RIG & ret income sol’n meets these criteria
- Develop a reasonable timeline w plan admin for implementing & communicating the ret income program
Describe the regulatory suggestion made in the SOA/SCL study for helping retirees convert DC plan assets to ret income:
The SOA/SCL study suggested a safe harbor guidance for the design & implementation of a program that would apply during the decumulation phase, analogous to the safe harbors that apply for investments during the accumulation phase.
What are the advantages to retiring EEs of an ER-sponsored program of taking retirement income from a DC plan? (3)
- Institutional pricing has the potential to increase ret incomes by 10-20% compared to retail solutions
- Sol’ns are more likely to be implemented successfully if it is easy for retiring EEs to implement their decision
- The ER’s plan is a safe place to keep ret savings away from fraudsters who target seniors.
Describe the basic purpose of a QLAC
Provide retirement income to individuals starting at an advanced age. Designed to provide added financial security to retirees in case they exhaust their retirement investments, such as by “living too long” or experiencing a major market downturn.
Describe the regulatory obstacle that, in the past, prevented the use of longevity contracts
Before release of the final rules, the IRS req’d that the value of any longevity contract must be included as part of a participant’s acct balance for RMD purposes. If participants included the annuity in their acct balance, and that balance dropped substantially, they might be req’d to start taking disturbs from the longevity contract much earlier than desired!!
OTOH if they did not include the value of any longevity contract as part of their acct balance, they risked incurring substantial penalties.
The final regs provide relief from this situation by allowing participants to exclude the value of a longevity annuity contract for RMD purposes if the annuity meets the def’n of a QLAC.
Do all types of ret plans qualify as QLACs? Explain?
Only DC plans (incl. 401k & profit-share), trad’l IRAs, 403b and 457b gov’t plans are eligible to hold QLACs.
Describe the contract features of QLACs with regard to:
1. The max premium that can be paid
2. The max age to commence pmts
3. Prohibited contract features
- The total prem cannot exceed the lesser of $145k (in 2022, indexed for inflation) or 25% of a participant’s agg acct balance.
- 85
- Variable contracts, indexed (or similar) contracts, and contracts w commutation benefits and cash surrender values are prohibited. Additionally there are restrictions on the death benefits that can be available under a QLAC.
Describe features required of QLACs, besides premium, max age of commencement, and prohibited features…
- Must contain specific language that identifies it as a QLAC
- Subject to an annual reporting req that includes, among other things: info about the plan & plan sponsor, annuity start date, amount of pmt, whether the start date may be accelerated
Are annuities widely available in US qualified ret plans?
No.
While annuities are widely supported by academics & policymakers, they’ve been slow to attract consumers and are not widely available in US qualified ret plans.
What is a longevity annuity?
AKA “longevity insurance,” “deferred income annuity”
An insurance product that pays retirees a permanent income lasting as long as the buyers live.
Specifically, individuals use a portion of their pre- or post-tax savings to purchase a deferred income annuity that begins paying a monthly income beginning at least a year from purchase. The goal of the product is to convert ret savings into guaranteed income for life.
How has the SECURE Act responded to fiduciary concerns re: offering longevity annuities within qualified plans?
Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement = SECURE Act
The SECURE Act responded to fiduciaries’ past concerns that they could be held responsible for an insurer’s solvency, if they selected an annuity provider. SECURE Act addressed this issue by stipulating that if insurers are selected prudently, the fiduciary is held harmless from legal liability.
Also, Act permitted plan participants who leave an ER or retire, to move their annuity to another plan or to an IRA without paying surrender charges.
Are the provisions of the SECURE Act sufficient to encourage large-scale adoption of longevity annuities within qualified plans?
Maybe not.
The provisions of the SECURE Act represented clear progress in promoting longevity annuity adoption within qualified ret plans, but these provisions may not be sufficient for a majority of plan sponsors.
What changes likely need to occur in order to have the adoption of longevity annuities scale as an offering in qualified plans? (4)
-Clearer rules for insurer & product selection are needed; longevity annuities should be added to the QDIA; annuity products should be made easier to purchase over time.
- Designing clearer rules about how insurers can qualify for the safe harbor. SInce the Dodd-Frank Act discouraged referencing credit ratings, practitioners have difficulty identifying the conditions under which insurers can qualify for the SECURE Act safe harbor. It would be useful to establish objective, easily verifiable parameters
- Clarifying rules: which kinds of annuities can be offered in ret plans? Similar to objective rules for receiving a QLAC designation and RMD exemption, similar rules would be helpful in fostering annuity adoption in qual plans.
- Designating longevity annuities as qualified default investment alternatives (QDIAs). If the goal is to enhance retirees’ lifetime income, there needs to be a default, which should be a QDIA.
- Permitting micro deposits in these products. Few insurers accept funds in small increments, so some technological and reporting challenges must be overcome.
Must ERISA investments always follow mainstream and popular strategies to be considered prudent?
On a historical basis, no.
Many innovative investment developments have occurred since the passage of ERISA, such as index funds, stable value investment options, emerging market mutual funds, TDFs. The belief by many that ERISA investments, particularly participant-directs investments, must always follow mainstream/popular strategies, and that deviation from such is imprudent, but on a historical basis, this isn’t the case.
Distinguish bt baseline prudent investment practices under ERISA and enhanced ERISA prudent best practices for innovative investments
Baseline prudent investment practices resulted when ERISA Ss. 404 was codified. This section sought to install longstanding principles of fiduciary conduct that had been developed under the common law of trusts, with the specific intent of protecting participants in EBPs.
Within Ss.404, Congress mandated baseline or core prudent practices for all ERISA plans using even the simplest of investments. The enhanced fiduciary best practices for innovative investments are a second, and necessarily deeper layer, that magnifies the baseline. This secondary, supplemental standard has been created by intermittent publications from the DOL.
Many parties are involved in an ERISA ret plan. However, when selecting plan investments, only the needs of 2 parties must be served:
Participants & their beneficiaries.
The decision to add an investment to an ERISA ret plan portfolio must be based solely upon the needs of the participants and their beneficiaries. A detailed checklist is recommended to cover all known conflicts of interest, and documentation should be maintained to demonstrate that the decision was made solely in the interest of the participants.
DOL has specified the responsibilities fiduciaries have when setting up a monitoring system for the fees associated with an investment: (3 points)
Trustees have an obligation to set up a monitoring system that:
1. Determines the needs of a fund’s participants
2. Reviews the services provided & fees charged by a number of different providers
3. Selects the provider whose service level, quality, and fees best match the fund’s needs & financial situation.
Define the “prudent man” standard required of ERISA plan investments
Requires investments to be made “with the care, the skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing that a prudent man acting in a like capacity and familiar with such matters would use in the conduct of an enterprise of a like character and with like aims.”
Explain the relationship bt modern portfolio theory (MPT) and the diversification requirement in ERISA
MPT constructs a risk/reward frontier that assumes diversification always eliminates non systematic risk. Since MPT is a bedrock tenet of ERISA, the diversification req is very important. It reduces the risk of large losses “…by diversifying the investments of the plan so as to minimize the risk of large losses, under the circumstances it is clearly prudent not to do so.’