8/8/16 Pharmacodynamics - Pilch Flashcards

1
Q

definitions

drug

pharmacodynamics vs pharmacokinetics

A

drug: any substance that brings about change in biological fx (ideally in a therapeutically useful way)

dynamics: what a drug does, physiological effects (what the drug does to you)

kinetics: what your body does to the drug to change it, eliminate it, etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

majority of drugs have MW 100-1000

why?

A

sweet spot for size

much smaller? sacrifice specificity bc the number/type of interactions is ltd

  • bad bc then you’re subject to more side effects

much larger? issues with transporting to site where it needs to act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

receptor concept

A

most drugs fx by interaction with a cognate receptor that plays regulatory role as a trigger → sets off cascade of downstream events → observed effect

receptors are macromolecules - mostly proteins, but some lipids/nucleic acids/etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

diff drugs show diff mechs of drug binding → pharmacological response

3 models

A
  1. agonism
  2. partial agonism
  3. antagonism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
  1. agonism
A
  • drug mimics action of endog compounds/ligands, bind to specific receptor → induce full scale response
  • INDUCERS
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q
  1. partial agonism
A
  • type of agonist that also induces a response BUT does not produce max response that we know the receptor is capable of producing
    • if max response isn’t achieved when receptors are saturated, partial agonist
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
  1. antagonism
A
  • bind to receptors, prevent agonists from inducing their response
    • no response to antagonist binding, BUT serve to block the response you’d see with an agonist
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

relationship between drug dose and pharmacologic response

A

RECEPTORS are at the heart of this relationship

  • affinity of receptor/drug for each other (Kd = dissociation constant)
  • number of receptors available for binding (and number that need to be hit for max response)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

eqn for E (pharmacologic effect)

A

E = [D]*Emax / [D]+EC50

E : pharmacologic effect

[D] : drug conc

Emax : maximal effect

EC50 : effective drug conc that elicits 50% of max effect

  • on semilog plot, EC50 is the inflection point of sigmoidal curve
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

potency

potency ratio

A

potency : measure of how much drug req to elicit a HALF-MAX response

potency ratio : comparison of EC50 values

  • more potent? lower EC50 → less drug needed to reach Emax
    • potentially lesser chance of hitting toxicity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

efficacy

A

measure of maximal response

  • drug with the higher Emax is more efficacious
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

clinical significance of potency and efficacy

A

efficacy → informs drug selection

  • also side effects, toxicity

potency → informs drug dosage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
  1. antagonism
    * how do you plot a dose-response curve?*

two types

A

block effect of endogenous agonists

  • do NOT induce an effect; rather, prevent inducers from inducing their effect
  • how do you plot a dose-response curve?*

plot response to an agonist IN PRESENCE OF DIFF DOSES OF ANTAGONIST!!!

types of antagonists

  1. competitive : compete with ligand for binding to receptor
  2. noncompetitive (irreversible)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

competitive antagonists

  • what they do
  • how they can be overcome & why
  • what type of plot youll see
A

bind to recepter to interfere with binding/action of agonist

  • effects can be overcome by adding more agonist (i.e. outcompeting the antagonist)

why?

bc binding is typically reversible!

  • binding AFFINITY is important to consider here

plot: at increasing [antagonist]

Emax stays the same, EC50 increases → reduces potency of the agonist!!!!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

therapeutic implications of competitive antagonists

A
  1. degree of inhibition produced depends on the [antagonist]
    * interindivid variation in pl levels of ant might require dosage adjustments
  2. clinical response depends on [endog agonist] competing for binding to receptors
  • episodic variation in agonist levels can interfere with antagonist action!
  • patient’s condition also influences effect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

noncompetitive (irrev) antagonists

A

permanent blockers of receptors (ex. via covalent binding)

implication: NO AMOUNT OF INCREASE OF ENDOG AGONIST CAN OVERCOME EFFECT OF NONCOMP ANTAGONISM

  • receptor can be replaced by body over time, which is why permanent blocking is ok
    ex. Prilosec (PPIs)

another implication: only requires a v low dose!

17
Q

noncomp antagonist plot

A

in increasing concentration of noncompetitive/irreversible antagonist,

  • Emax drops (less functional receptor available → cant induce as high an effect)
  • EC50 stays the same

effectively changes an agonist into a partial agonist!

18
Q

noncompetitive antagonists: adv and disadv

A

advantage: maintains blockage even through episodic [agonist] changes

disadvantage: overdose is a big issue, difficult to tackle

19
Q

other mechs of antagonism

A

1. chemical antagonism

  • a drug may bind to and inactivate another drug
  • ex. Protamine antagonizes heparin via electrostatic binding

2. physiologic antagonism

  • a drug may antagonize the physio response that another induces [opposing effects]
  • ex. glucocorticoids lead to side effect increase in blood sugar → insulin can counter it

3. pharmacokinetic antagonism

  • one drug induces metabolism of another drug [can be increased or decreased metab! → lack of efficacy or increased tox]
  • ex. phenobarbital triggers metabolic clearance of warfarin
20
Q

selectivity of drug binding and action

A

binding influenced by molecular size, shape, and electrical charge

sensitivity to a drug/selectivity for a particular tissue can be conferred by concentration of receptor

  • overexpression of a particular receptor makes a tissue hypersensitive
  • “spare receptors”
  • can be used to target particular tissues
21
Q

spare receptors and tissue sensitivity

A

spare receptors allow an agonist to induce Emax WITHOUT binding to all available receptors!

  • more receptors expressed than needed for response
  • increase likelihood of ligand being bound at low conc of drug
22
Q

how can you tell if your tissue has spare receptors?

A
  1. administer a noncomp antagonist
  2. if you see that there is an increase in EC50 followed by an decrease in Emax…

SPARE RECEPTORS

why?

as drug hits the spares, Emax isn’t affected because they’re extras - still have enough to hit Emax

once you knock out spares tho, Emax will drop

23
Q

limitations of graded dose-response curves

how do you overcome them?

  • what’s plotted
  • what’s ED50
A
  1. hard to construct for quantal events (either/or…occurence or non-occurence of an event)
  2. quantitative DR relationship for one person might not hold for everyone due to individ variability
    enter. ..QUANTAL DOSE-RESPONSE CURVE
  • plot cumulative % of individuals “responding” however you want to track vs. log(dose)
  • diff: ED50 aka efficacious dose = dose at which 50% of pop shows response
24
Q

therapeutic index

TD50

what if TI is lousy?

A

allows you to see a drug’s measure of toxicity, TD50 (dose that produces toxic response in 50% of recipients)

therapeutic index = TD50/ED50

[typically desire at least 10]

measure of safety because it gives you margin of safety in dosage

you might still use a drug with a lousy TI if you have no alternatives!