7.1 Theorists Flashcards
Religion and Society
Alan Aldridge
inclusive and exclusive definitions of religion
Inclusive
Religion is defined broadly and could include devotion to a soccer team or royalty to a rock band or rap artist.
Inclusive or broad definitions would also include political belief systems such as nationalism, fascism and communism.
The focus on function means the content of religious beliefs is unimportant – it does not matter who, what or how people worship.
What is important is the fact that people act in a specific, often collective ways, and that they hold certain types of belief that influence their behaviour.
For inclusive approaches, therefore, the key to understanding religion is to see it as a belief system, or ideology based on faith: the uncritical and unconditional acceptance of a particular set of ideas
Exclusive
This excludes ‘quasi-religious’ behaviour that might serve a similar function to religion but which is not actually religious in the strict sense of the term.
Exclusive approaches involve a substantive definition of religion focused on its content or substance: the beliefs, practices and organisations that are distinctively religious and that mark religious behaviour as substantively different from other, similar, behaviours.
Mcguire
Suggests that problems of definition arise because religion has a ‘dual character’ it is both individual and social.
- On an individual level, different religions encompass different beliefs and practices and teach a variety of ways to ‘be religious. Individual indicators are on the basis of religious belief such as orthodox or unorthodox.
- On a social level religion is functional: for example socialisation of moral values, promotion of social solidarity and social control. Social indicators measure things like religious participation.
Durkheim
2 main functions
Social solidarity: this relates to how religion creates a feeling of belonging to a particular group by providing individuals with shared beliefs and values.
Social integration: this relates to the specific ways in which social solidarity is created, through mechanisms such as shared practices and experiences.
Maguire
Describes ‘The Sacred’ (an essential characteristic of religion) as ‘that which is utterly and mysteriously precious in our experience’ and which is frequently represented through objects.
s
Cornwall et al
identified 3 broad dimensions of religiosity
knowing or the ‘belief dimension’
doing: an indicator of religious participation/membership
feeling: a specific measure of commitment to both an individual’s beliefs and any religious organisation with which they identify.
Hughes and Church
do ‘religious beliefs’ mean the same thing to everyone?
One way around this problem is, to use a proxy indicator of belief, such as whether people believe in a ‘higher being’. If they do, this indicates that they hold some form of religious belief. If they do not, this suggests that they are unlikely to hold further beliefs that could be classed as religious.
(not helpful for unconventional beliefs; NAMs, NRMs)
Abrams et al
Suggested that a more valid way to understand religiosity is to measure commitment – the extent to which people feel they belong to a particular religion using a scale that measures and combines four
main commitments:
- Disposition: the philosophical dimension to religiosity through questions about spiritual ideas and experiences, such as whether people ‘draw comfort from prayer’.
- Orthodox belief: the extent to which people believe in ideas like god or the soul.
- Moral values: how these are influenced by religious values and teachings.
- Institutional attachment: the frequency with which people attend religious services, meetings and ceremonies.
Navone
Argues ‘just because people say they are religious, does not make it so, no more than if they say they are intelligent or moral’.
2015 YouGov survey of 7000 adults
Found that 62% of regular church goers were middle class and 38% working class.
The same 2015 survey found that twice as many married working class men had never attended church compared to middle class men (17% compared to 9%).
Voas and Watt
Conducted research on behalf of the Church of England and made three observations not directly about social class, but relevant to it.
- Firstly, church attendance is higher in rural areas compared to urban areas.
- Secondly, church attendance is higher in the South of England compared to the North.
- Thirdly, they noted growth in church attendance in areas which had high performing church primary and secondary schools.
All of these indicators suggest higher church attendance in middle class compared to working class areas.
Ashworth and Farthing
Found that, for both sexes, those in middle class jobs had above average levels of church attendance. Conversely, those in skilled, semi-skilled and unskilled working class jobs had below average church attendance. Welfare recipients had the lowest levels of church attendance.
Lawes
Found that ‘lifelong theists’ disproportionately come from unskilled and semi-skilled manual backgrounds, and were less likely to have academic qualifications. Conversely, lifelong atheists disproportionately come from higher professional and managerial backgrounds, and are more likely to have experienced higher education.
Andrew Mckinnon
Notes that there has been a ‘dearth’ of research on the relationship between religion and social class, meaning there is something of a data gap.
Because of the above, we are often stuck with relying on indicators which might not actually measure social class.
Even if the data suggests that church attendance and belief are higher among the middle classes, this doesn’t necessarily mean the middle classes are actually more religious. They may just be attending church to keep up appearances or to get their children into the local church school (which tend to have high academic performance); or they may feel under more social pressure to state they are religious than the working classes
Stark and Bainbridge
argue that cults draw their members from the higher social classes
Aidan Kelly
Wiccan
has suggested that new religious movements are founded and populated by the educated middle classes.