7: Sampling and Ethics Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Regarding sampling, define:

  • Universe
  • Population
  • Sample

Provide examples for each.

A

Universe: broad population to which you want to eventually generalize your findings to (e.g., all people with anorexia nervosa).

Population: defined group within the universe from which the sample will be selected (e.g., AN patients at 10 specific hospitals).

Sample: participants who actually take part in the study (e.g., 50 participants from those hospitals).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define a statistic versus a population parameter.

A

Statistic: quantitative measurement from a sample, what we actually get in research.

Population parameter: estimate of the value in the population. What we want to know, almost never know with certainty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Any single study can only generalize to the _____ of interest.

A

Population.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Generalizing to the whole universe is sometimes done if mechanism is plausible, but it is a _____, not statistical inference.

A

Logical.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

All of the statistics that use p-values and confidence intervals depend upon a random sample. Why is it a problem when you don’t have a random sample?

A

The estimates from the statistics are liable to be biased away from those who do not participate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Population is defined using _____ and _____ criteria

A

Inclusion; exclusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define homogeneous and heterogeneous sampling.

A

Homogeneous: very strict selection criteria.

Heterogeneous: varied population with very few selection criteria.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

List one pro and two cons to homogeneous sampling.

A

Pro: reduces error, and thus increases statistical power.

Cons: reduced generalizability to the universe; creates difficulty in finding eligible participants.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the two types of sampling in qualitative research?

A

Purposive sampling: selecting according to criteria important to research question; may be inclusion/exclusion criteria OR deliberately selecting broad range of demographics.

Theoretical sampling: in grounded theory, participants who are sampled may change as the theory develops during research. Data collection continues until theoretical saturation is reached (no new data).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How can sample characteristics pose a threat to external validity? What is a solution?

A

Differences between study sample and other samples you wish to generalize the finding to (e.g. age, gender, etc.); many of these demographics could act as moderators (e.g., sample of women can’t generalize to men).

Solution: get a representative sample, or don’t generalize to people not represented by your sample.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is ecological validity and what is a solution to potential threats?

A

The methods, materials and setting of the study must approximate the real-life situation under investigation.

Solution: Try to make research approximate real-life OR test to make sure lab experiments are applicable to real-life decisions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How can reactivity of experimental arrangements pose a threat to external validity? What is a solution?

A

Awareness of being in a study may affect behavior or elicit reactions, may have theories about what is transpiring, may try to act as expected (to make study a success) or try to violate expectations (to make study fail).

Solution: don’t let participants know hypotheses ahead of time; use unobtrusive or implicit measures; use placebo treatment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is multiple-treatment interference and what is a solution for it?

A

If researcher were to apply several treatments, difficult to determine how well each of the treatments would work individually.

Solution: if multiple treatments, use Treatment 1, Treatment 2, control, and “both” groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define novelty and disruption effects and provide a solution.

A

Novelty effect: treatment appears to work in the short term because it’s “new” and people are enthusiastic and have high expectations.

Disruption effect: treatment appears to fail in the short term because it changes daily routine, and takes some time to properly implement.

Solution: wait a while after a program has been implemented before evaluating effectiveness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is test sensitivity? Provide an example. What is a solution?

A

Whether pre-testing or test itself alters subject experience and responses.

E.g., what effect does rating mood prior to a mood induction technique have on how you evaluate mood after manipulation?

Solution: avoid within-subject design, or multiple conditions varying the order of stimuli presentation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe two sample selection biases.

A

Convenience Sampling: Admitting anyone you can find into the study, usually from a population that is easy to recruit (e.g., students).

WEIRD research: Western Educated Industrialized Rich Democratic

17
Q

Regarding WEIRD research, meta-analysis between 2003-2007 of 6 top psychology journals found what two statistics?

A

80% of participants were psychology undergrads.

96% of samples come from countries that make up only 12% of the population.

18
Q

How many participants you need to have a successful experiment relies on what three pieces of information?

A

Effect size.

Alpha (chance for Type I error).

Beta (chance for Type II error).

19
Q

Effect size addresses what two questions?

A

How large is the effect in the population?

What is the smallest effect that is clinically relevant?

20
Q

List the two common standardized metrics for effect size and what is considered small, medium, and large.

A

Pearson’s r, for correlations; .10 = small; .30 = medium; .50 = large.

Cohen’s d, (Mean Difference) / Pooled Std. Dev.; .20 = small; .50 = medium; .80 = large.

21
Q

What does alpha mean? What is it usually set at?

A

Probability of finding an effect when none exists, also known as “Type I error” or “false positive.” Value set based on how confident want to be with results.

.05 (a 5% chance of making a Type I error).

22
Q

What does beta mean and how does it relate to statistical power? What does the value depend on and what is the conventional value?

A

Probability of missing an effect that is in fact present, also known as “Type II error” or “false negative.”

Statistical power is defined as 1 minus Beta.

Depends on sample size, population parameter for effect size - larger for both = more statistical power.

Conventional value for statistical power is .80 (20% chance of Type II error).

23
Q

Who were the participants in the Monster Study (1939) and what were the two conditions?

A

Participants: 22 orphan children.

Positive praise for children with stuttering to try and improve their condition.

Induce stuttering condition, where the researchers attempt to induce stuttering in healthy children.

24
Q

What were the consequences of the Monster Study (1939)?

A

University made public apology in 2001, six of the 10 people in the induce stuttering condition sued in 2003.

None developed stuttering, many had serious emotional scars - one child ran away from the orphanage to escape the “intervention.”

25
Q

Informed consent includes the idea of full information. Describe it. What are caveats to this?

A

Must tell participants everything they need to know to make a rational decision about participating in study, usually includes signed informed consent form.

Caveats: participants’ understanding needed; competence to provide consent; problems with deception.

26
Q

Describe freedom of choice, with regards to informed consent, and two potential issues.

A

Participation must be voluntary, without coercion.

Implicit coercion from clinicians; captive populations.

27
Q

Research should not harm participants. If harm is unavoidable, what is a prerequisite?

A

Potential gain to humanity must outweigh the harm done.

28
Q

Harm should be minimized in all ways possible. What is one way to do this?

A

Using as small a sample as possible.

29
Q

Describe five ethical considerations in which benefits can be withheld in clinical trials.

A

Control groups: harmed by withholding treatment?

Inflexible treatments: clinician cannot adapt using intuition or judgement.

Randomization: lack of choice of treatments.

Narrow inclusion criteria: often excludes co-morbid patients.

Referrals at termination: good research would dictate participants don’t seek additional treatment.

30
Q

With regards to ethics in research, define privacy and confidentiality.

A

Privacy: participant’s right not to provide information to the researcher if they feel it’s intrusive.

Confidentiality: data should be anonymous and even anonymous data should be accessible by only a few people.

31
Q

What are the three levels of ethics review?

A

Exempt: (a) Publicly available data; (b) research-like activities like quality assurance; (c) educational activities.

Expedited: usually reserved for modifications to an existing study.

Full Review: everything else; usually takes quite a while.

32
Q

In science, what is the difference between error and fraud?

A

Error is an honest mistake, fraud is intentional effort to deceive and misrepresent.

33
Q

Describe, briefly, the Burt Affair.

A

Controversy against Sir Cyril Burt, who was said to have published false data to support theory that intelligence is largely inherited.

34
Q

List six questionable research practices.

A

Changing hypotheses to fit data.

Selective reporting of favourable results.

Selective citation from (of) other studies.

Citing from secondary sources.

Incorrectly citing sources.

Failure to correct errors detected after publication.

35
Q

The Reproducibility Project found what two things?

A

Lower means, higher standard deviations.

Effect sizes in pre-registered studies were about half the size.