7: Sampling and Ethics Flashcards
Regarding sampling, define:
- Universe
- Population
- Sample
Provide examples for each.
Universe: broad population to which you want to eventually generalize your findings to (e.g., all people with anorexia nervosa).
Population: defined group within the universe from which the sample will be selected (e.g., AN patients at 10 specific hospitals).
Sample: participants who actually take part in the study (e.g., 50 participants from those hospitals).
Define a statistic versus a population parameter.
Statistic: quantitative measurement from a sample, what we actually get in research.
Population parameter: estimate of the value in the population. What we want to know, almost never know with certainty.
Any single study can only generalize to the _____ of interest.
Population.
Generalizing to the whole universe is sometimes done if mechanism is plausible, but it is a _____, not statistical inference.
Logical.
All of the statistics that use p-values and confidence intervals depend upon a random sample. Why is it a problem when you don’t have a random sample?
The estimates from the statistics are liable to be biased away from those who do not participate.
Population is defined using _____ and _____ criteria
Inclusion; exclusion.
Define homogeneous and heterogeneous sampling.
Homogeneous: very strict selection criteria.
Heterogeneous: varied population with very few selection criteria.
List one pro and two cons to homogeneous sampling.
Pro: reduces error, and thus increases statistical power.
Cons: reduced generalizability to the universe; creates difficulty in finding eligible participants.
What are the two types of sampling in qualitative research?
Purposive sampling: selecting according to criteria important to research question; may be inclusion/exclusion criteria OR deliberately selecting broad range of demographics.
Theoretical sampling: in grounded theory, participants who are sampled may change as the theory develops during research. Data collection continues until theoretical saturation is reached (no new data).
How can sample characteristics pose a threat to external validity? What is a solution?
Differences between study sample and other samples you wish to generalize the finding to (e.g. age, gender, etc.); many of these demographics could act as moderators (e.g., sample of women can’t generalize to men).
Solution: get a representative sample, or don’t generalize to people not represented by your sample.
What is ecological validity and what is a solution to potential threats?
The methods, materials and setting of the study must approximate the real-life situation under investigation.
Solution: Try to make research approximate real-life OR test to make sure lab experiments are applicable to real-life decisions.
How can reactivity of experimental arrangements pose a threat to external validity? What is a solution?
Awareness of being in a study may affect behavior or elicit reactions, may have theories about what is transpiring, may try to act as expected (to make study a success) or try to violate expectations (to make study fail).
Solution: don’t let participants know hypotheses ahead of time; use unobtrusive or implicit measures; use placebo treatment.
What is multiple-treatment interference and what is a solution for it?
If researcher were to apply several treatments, difficult to determine how well each of the treatments would work individually.
Solution: if multiple treatments, use Treatment 1, Treatment 2, control, and “both” groups.
Define novelty and disruption effects and provide a solution.
Novelty effect: treatment appears to work in the short term because it’s “new” and people are enthusiastic and have high expectations.
Disruption effect: treatment appears to fail in the short term because it changes daily routine, and takes some time to properly implement.
Solution: wait a while after a program has been implemented before evaluating effectiveness.
What is test sensitivity? Provide an example. What is a solution?
Whether pre-testing or test itself alters subject experience and responses.
E.g., what effect does rating mood prior to a mood induction technique have on how you evaluate mood after manipulation?
Solution: avoid within-subject design, or multiple conditions varying the order of stimuli presentation.