7. Same Sex Aggression- Challenge hypothesis Flashcards
What are the costs of Testosterone?
Wingfield et al. 2001
- Interference with paternal care
- Exposure to predators
- Increase risk of injury
- Loss of fat stores
- And possibly immune system function and oncogenic (tumour casing) effects.
Why would we expect to find T in human aggression?
- the clear association between age and physical aggression young adult males show higher levels of physical aggression, violence and homicides to members of the same sex (Archer, 2004) than do other age and sex categories. fit the view that human male aggression is, like that of many other mammals heightened when reproductive competition is most intense
- Among birds and mammals, one widespread mechanism that increases the readiness of males to fight during phases of the life-history when reproductive opportunities are greatest is the action of testosterone on areas of the brain controlling aggressive behavior (Archer, 1988). T is enhanced at times in life when males need to compete for receptive females or the resources necessary to attract such females, i.e. in the breeding season or after sexual maturity.
How true is it that T controls violence in males in a linear fashion?
The view that testosterone secreted by males at puberty and throughout adult life facilitates human male aggression, despite its superficial appeal and its incorporation into media accounts of young men’s behavior, is at best an oversimplification.
The consensus is that there is a weak and inconsistent association between testosterone levels and aggression in adults (Archer 2006), and that the administration of testosterone to volunteers typically does not increase their aggression (O’Connor et al., 2004).
Who made the Challenge Hypothesis?
Wingfield et al, 1990
who made the argument that the challenger hypothesis could also be applied to humans?
Archer (2006) makes the argument that this can be applied to humans also.
what does the challenge hypothesis stipulate?
- there are specific context-dependent increases in testosterone levels that are associated with aggression
- T levels rise to moderate levels at the start of the breeding season and these levels support reproductive physiology and behaviour.
- During challenges to males in contexts that are relevant to reproduction, T levels rise further
- This in turn facilitates aggression in the context of territory formation, dominance disputes and mate guarding (Wingfield et al. 2000).
- Then.. when males are required to care for offspring, their T levels decrease.
Support for challenger hypothesis in Animals
Administering high levels of exogenous testosterone to several species of birds increased their mating and aggressive behaviour and supressed their paternal behaviour –Wingfield, 1984.
support for Challenger hypothesis adaptation in chimps. Background to study
Muller and Wrangham 2004
o unlike the bird species on which the hypothesis was based, chimpanzees are neither seasonal breeders nor monogamous.
o Reasoning that the hypothesis may apply in different ways to mammals, the researchers predicted that since access to receptive and fertile females was relatively uncommon for male chimpanzees, there should be maximal aggression at such times. Indeed, it is known that males are more aggressive in the presence of parous estrous females.
o Muller and Wrangham also predicted that testosterone levels would be greater for dominant than for low-status males, since dominant males were more aggressive at all times.
support for Challenger hypothesis adaptation in chimps. Predictions
Muller and Wrangham also predicted that testosterone levels would be greater for dominant than for low-status males, since dominant males were more aggressive at all times.
support for Challenger hypothesis adaptation in chimps. Findings
o Got urine samples from chimps and found support for their modified version of challenger hypothesis in a number of ways:
o 1) When parous (offspring bearing) females were in estrus, there was a significant increase in testosterone and also an increase in aggressive competition. This did not occur in the presence of nulliparous females, whom males generally find less attractive but with whom they still copulate
o 2) Also consistent with predictions, dominant males were more aggressive than low-ranking ones, and produced higher levels of testosterone
why would we expect to see the challenge hypothesis in humans males?
The range of possible mating systems, which can be linked to ecological conditions prompts the suggestion that there could be a role of testosterone in these alternative mating systems in humans.
how do humans vary from chimps and how do human males vary to each other?
Humans show neither breeding seasons nor oestrus.
They show paternal care, but the extent to which individual males are committed to paternal care is variable both according to ecological conditions and according to individual variation. There may be considerable variation between men in this and other attributes resulting from sexual selection, for example in mate choice preferences and physical aggression.
who extended the challenge hypothesis to incorporate individual differences?
Archer 2006
what 6 predictions did Archer make about the challenge hypothesis in males?
1) there is no increase in aggression at puberty
2) Men respond to sexual arousal/ threat with increased T
3) The T response to challenge increases aggression
4) T levels lower in paternal men
5) Aggressive dominance is correlated with T
6) T is associated with alternative life history strategies
how can Archer’s 4 and 5th hypothesis be extended into the 6th?
They highlight that there are adaptive costs, as well as benefits of high T levels. Thus there is a trade-off between mating effort (supported by high T levels) which involves the cost of high T levels but may lead to enhanced fitness benefits and parental effort (supported by lower T levels), which involves a lower cost and lower fitness benefit).
Testosterone levels vary among human males, and this variation may reflect a relatively enduring preference for one of two life-history strategies
what would be the two life-history strategies in males.
The first (high parental investment) involves an emphasis on long-term commitment to one mate and paternal care, accompanied by low mating effort, whereas the second (low parental investment) involves low commitment to one mate and no paternal care, accompanied by high mating effort.