(7) MEMORIALISATION Flashcards
memorialisation constitutes
range of deliberate processes and acts to facilitate public truth-telling and preserve the memory of past atrocities (form of symbolic reparations)
Without memory of the past, there can be no right to
truth, justice, reparation or guarantees of non-repetition (hence its standing as the 5th pillar of TJ)
Memorialisation as a pillar of TJ is critical for
implementaiton of the 4 other pillars and to emerge from cycle of hatred to culture of peace
Is there a right to memory?
- No explicit right to memory in international law but implicit in teh right to truth and other rights
- has also been enshrined in some treaties and through soft law
Ways to participate in memorialisation
- Freedom of expression, assembly and association
- Right to participate in and to enjoy culture
- Freedom of artistic expression
State’s obligation wrt memorialisation - legal framework
- Prevent and prohibit mass atrocities, punish perpetrators (eg in GC)
Memorialisation should be aimed at preserving
the collective memory from extinction and, in particular, at guarding against the development of revisionist and negationist arguments.
Functions of memorialisaton
- Reconciliation
- Recognition of victims
- Promotion of national identity through the rewriting of an inclusive historical narrative
- Healing
- Truth-telling
- Civic engagement, critical thinking
- Prevention of future violence (“never again”)
Symbolic reparations thru memorialisations like monuments adn museums must be linked with endeavours that
improve everyday lives of victims and their communities – need to involve victims in design and creation of monuments to create sense of local ownership so as to avoid risk of irrelevance
Example of memorialisation - Sri Lanka
Herstories project - 285 stories from women from all sides
What was a critique of the Herstories project - Sri Lanka
memorialization can also perpetuate divisions and perpetuate the power imbalances that were present during the conflict
Risks with memorialisation
1) memories and history highly devisive
2) can re-traumatise victims
3) modalities affect perceptions (ie statute vs oral history - dif impacts)
4) memorials themselves don’t just promote reconciliation