7. Insolvency Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are the primary sources of legislation?

A

Bankruptcy (S) Act 1985

Insolvency Act 1986

BANKRUPTCY (SCOTLAND) ACT 1985, as amended 1993 & 2008 & to be amended in 2015

Together with certain common law provisions, the Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 1985, as amended by the Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 1993 and the Bankruptcy and Diligence etc (Scotland) Act 2007 and the Bankruptcy and Debt Advice (Scotland) Act 2014, governs insolvency of all insolvents in Scotland except registered companies. The law for England and Wales is contained in the Second and Third Groups of Parts of the Insolvency Act 1986.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is insolvency?

A

Insolvency is not a term of art. It is a general expression which can be used to describe a variety of individual discrete processes which can be carried out judicially or extra judicially with minimal judicial oversight.

In broad terms insolvency relates to the procedures that are put in place whereby a third party administers assets of a debtor in order to satisfy the debtors liabilities.

Various legal and practical consequences of insolvency in the financial sense require further clarification. Common element to these procedures is that an officially appointed third party has the responsibility of turning the property into liquid assets (if it is not already in such a form) and distributing such assets to creditors in a statutorily prescribed manner in an attempt to settle the debtor’s debts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Are there distinctions between the types of debtor?

A

Yes -in Scots law there is a distinction between types of debtor: company debtors – corporate insolvency; and non-company debtors – sequestration (bankruptcy). However, note too there are a number of similarities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the main types of insolvency process?

A

We will focus on sequestration, administration and liquidation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is sequestration?

A

Judicial process transferring whole assets of insolvent to trustee in sequestration. This is done for the purposes of sale of the property by the trustee and distribution to the creditors of the insolvent. Available for all insolvents except registered companies. That is, individual persons, partnerships, unregistered corporate bodies etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is Trust Deed for Behoof of Creditors?

A

Similar to sequestration except procedure is voluntary rather than judicial. This procedure can be less expensive than sequestration so leaving more funds for distribution to creditors. Not available to registered companies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is bankruptcy?

A

This term is used indeterminately to refer to any of the above states of insolvency. Often it is used to refer to the process of sequestration or the granting of a trust deed. Bankruptcy is usually concerned with the affairs of individuals, partnerships and unincorporated bodies, rather than companies which are concerned with liquidation, receivership and administration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is liquidation?

A

Procedure for ‘winding up’ registered companies or LLPs. Liquidator appointed with similar role to trustee in sequestration (they replace the managers of the business to realise the assets and dissolve the business). At the end of liquidation, company is ‘dissolved’. Available for solvent as well as insolvent companies. If it is not an insolvent liquidation and the creditors are paid off and there is money left over, where does the money go? The money goes to the shareholders because they were the investors in the business.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is receivership?

A

Used for enforcing ‘old floating charges’ (pre effect of Enterprise Act 2002). Receiver takes over the running of the company. Realises assets for benefit of chargeholder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is administration?

A

Only available for companies. This can be initiated out of court by the floating charge holder. The floating charge holder can apply to appoint an administrator - they must notify the court that this is taking place but they do not need to obtain court authority for this. Administrator takes over management of company for benefit of all concerned. Rights of creditors suspended. Sometimes the business can be sold but the old company dissolved.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is Company Voluntary Arrangements?

A

Deal approved by the majority of creditors for payment at less than 100% of debts due. And the company will continue to trade after this.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How does insolvency occur?

A

Failure to pay one’s debts is the first step on the road to bankruptcy. However, before the provisions of the 1985 Act (as amended) can be invoked by creditors in an attempt to have outstanding debts settled, the debtor must be ‘insolvent’. There are three possible states of insolvency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the three possible states of insolvency?

A

1) Absolute insolvency
⁃ This is where your total debts are greater than your total assets. A number of businesses trade perfectly despite being ‘absolutely insolvent’ (e.g. Hamilton Accidemicals, Eurotunnel).
⁃ But if you are absolutely insolvent and practically insolvent then you have a big problem.
⁃ If a debtor is absolutely insolvent and gives away assets or sells them under value these transactions may be liable to reduction.

2) Practical insolvency
⁃ This is ‘cash flow insolvency’ - where the debtor does not have the cash to pay debts as they fall due. So while the debtor may have assets greater than liabilities, they may just not be readily liquid.
⁃ (E.g. castle owner who can’t pay for repairs).
⁃ Practical insolvency doesn’t necessarily mean you are going to enter a formal insolvency process. It does typically lead to a trigger to various enforcement processes - your creditors are more likely to do diligence against you.

⁃ Absolute and practical insolvency are two tests listed in s 1(2)(iii) of the Insolvency Act 1986 to identify when a company is unable to pay its debts. And if it is unable to pay its debts then you can initiate the administration procedure or liquidation.

3) Apparent insolvency
⁃ This is a statutory test. Under s 7 of the Bankruptcy (S) Act 1985 gives you a list[ a. sequestrated or made bankrupt in UK
b. debtor gives written notice to creditors that he has ceased to pay debts
ba. Becomes subject to insolvency in EU member state other than UK
c. i debtor grants trust deed to creditors
c. ii charge for payment served on debtor and expires without payment
c iv. decree of adjudication is granted
c vi debt payment programme under 2002 Act is revoked
d. creditor owed prescribed amount (£750) serves statutory demand for payment and denial of debt by debtor or no payment of debt within 3 weeks] of events. If one of these things happens then you are deemed to be apparently insolvent. The s 7 list applies to ALL PERSONS: COMPANIES AND NATURAL PERSONS.
⁃ The most important in the list for our purposes is s 7(1)(c)(ii) - charge for payment served on debtor and expires without payment, or s 7(1)(c)(iii) - a deed of adjudication is granted over the debtor’s assets.

In the case of (ca), (cb), and (cc) s 7 (1A) provides that there is no apparent insolvency triggered if the debtor was able and willing to pay debts as they fall due, or the debtor had a restraining order that made payment impossible).

⁃ A charge for payment is where a creditor who wishes to carry out arrestment or attachment must give notice to the debtor (by a charge for payment) of a period of time for them to pay and that if they don’t pay apparent insolvency is triggered.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When do unpaid employees get paid in cases of insolvency?

A

[[[[NB unpaid employees get paid before unsecured creditors (they are preferential creditors)]]]][ Just stuck this in here so i don’t forget.]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Why is it important to determine which form of insolvency applies to a particular debtor?

A

Because different consequences flow from the different forms of insolvency. Absolute insolvency is largely relevant to gratuitous alienations and unfair preferences. Apparent insolvency is very important for equalisation of diligence and sequestration petitions. It may also be important for termination of contracts.

It is important to note that rules on gratuitous alienations and unfair preferences apply equally to individuals and registered companies. Also companies can be absolutely or apparently insolvent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the effects of apparent insolvency?

A

Apparent insolvency has two important effects:

(1) Precondition to Sequestration.
(2) Equalisation of Arrestments and Attachments.

See Sch 7 para 24, Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 1985 (applicable to company and non-company insolvencies – see Clark v Hinde Milne & Co (1884) 12 R 347).

Note as apparent insolvency triggered by specific events there might be multiple periods of apparent insolvency leading to overlaps: see Gretton, (1983) 28 JLSS 18.

See also Diligence Act 1661 and Adjudication Act 1672: adjudications within a year and a day are equalised. (These statutes are to be repealed by the 2007 Act once adjudications are abolished (if that ever happens..))

Note: prerequisite diligence to be on the same asset.

17
Q

How do these rules operate in practice?

A

?

18
Q

A has £15,000 in a bank account with B. C is a creditor of A owed £10,000. D is a creditor of A owed £20,000. C arrests the bank account on 1st March. D arrests the bank account on 1st June.

What does each creditor receive?

A

(a) The default position.
(b) If A was apparently insolvent on 1st April.

Note: the rule in Stewart v Jarvie 1938 SC 309 and Gaffney & Son Ltd v Davidson 1995 SLT (Sh Ct) 36 and the effect of sequestration and liquidation.

See s 37, Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 1985 applied to liquidation by s 185, Insolvency Act 1986. Sequestration is deemed to be adjudication, arrestment, or attachment (the reference to adjudication will be removed by the 2007 Act if land attachments ever come into force).

See also s 37 (2) 1985 Act (applied to liquidation s 185, 1986 Act) for inhibitions and s 37 (4) for arrestments, attachments interim attachments and money attachments – the 60 day rule and ineffectual diligence. The former provides that inhibitions in the 60 days before sequestration become for the benefit of the trustee in sequestration on sequestration. New rules for land attachments are to be introduced in s 37 (5B) (if that part of the BAD Act ever comes into force) and will provide for a 6 month striking down period. It will not be competent to do land attachments after sequestration.

Section 37 (4) is tremendously important. [ See below]

19
Q

What common rules apply whatever the type of insolvency process (liquidation, administration, sequestration)?

A

1) Equalisation of diligences
2) Arrestments and attachments[ More important are the rules relating to arrestments and attachments].
3) The 60 day rule

20
Q

What are the various rules in equalisation of diligences?

A

⁃ In equalisation of diligences there are a variety of rules.
⁃ 1) Adjudications
⁃ The first rule is in relation to adjudications. Under the Diligence Act 1661, if there are two adjudications carried out on the same asset within 1 year and 1 day of each other then the two diligences are equalised (they rank equally).
⁃ NB under s 37 Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 1985 (applied to liquidation by s 185, Insolvency Act 1986) sequestration and liquidation are deemed to be adjudication, arrestment, or attachment (the reference to adjudication will be removed by the 2007 Act if land attachments ever come into force).
⁃ This means that if there is an adjudication which is carried out within 1 year and 1 day of the sequestration/liquidation it may be equalised with the sequestration/liquidation.
- So sequestration has an affect as if it is an adjudication
- And see s185 of Insolvency Act
- So when you apply these two rules together the equalisation rule in the 1661 Act and s185 of Insolvency Act is equalised with sequestration of winding up. So adjudication within a year and a day of sequestration gets no priority. The adjudged loses their priority in that case.
- Example: if adjudication is carried out on 26 March and the adjudicator becomes sequestrated in 30 March, the adjudicator has no priority over the sequestration and they are equalised.

21
Q

What happens under the rules relating to arrestments and attachments?

A

⁃ Under 1985 Act schedule 7 para 24[ Make sure to read this. p. 337. ] of Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act p. 337 there is an equalisation rule which means that:
*All arrestments and attachments carried out 60 days before or 4 months after apparent insolvency[ Apparent insolvency is the list of events which are set out in s7 of Bankruptcy (S) Act 1985 - it gives you a list of things that might happen. if any one of those things happens which is listed in s7 that is apparent insolvency. This includes becoming insolvent in another country in the UK, bankruptcy in England and NI. Also when a charge for payment expires without the debt being paid.

NB the Sheriff Officer cannot arrest unless there has been a charge for payment. ] shall also be equalised.
- This rule is really important it applies to corporate insolvency.
⁃ Example:
⁃ A has £15,000 in bank with B. C is a creditor of A owed £10,000. D is a creditor of A owed £20,000. C arrests the bank account on 1st March. D arrests the bank account on 1st June. This is double distress.
- Double distress you have 1 March and 1 June, so there must have been an event of apparent insolvency which took place prior to that arrestment being carried out.
- So if the charge for payment expires on 2 February that is the date of apparent insolvency. You can have multiple events of apparent insolvency (does not happen just once).
- You then go back 60 days and forward 4 months to see what is within the date of apparent insolvency. Where they are, they are equalised and have no priority over each other. They rank pari passu over that bank account (equally).
- So C will get 10/30th and D will get 20/30th. C will get £5,000 and D will get £10,000.
- This is because pari passu ranking is proportionate.
⁃ If e.g. There is a trigger event for apparent insolvency e.g. on the 15 Feb then C will lose their priority - the C and D’s diligences will be equalised.

22
Q

Stewart v Jarvie 1938

A

[ THE RULE IN THIS CASE IS REALLY IMPORTANT BECAUSE EVEN IF A CREDITOR DOES DILIGENCE BEFORE LIQUIDATION THERE IS STILL A RISK THAT THEIR DILIGENCE WILL BE EQUALISED.]

⁃ This case demonstrates what happens where there is competition between an arrestment and sequestration. This is because sequestration under s 37 1985 Act is deemed to be an arrestment and an attachment. This means that in this situation if on the 16 Oct there is an arrestment by the creditor. On the 27 November there is apparent insolvency and on the 4 January there is sequestration (and sequestration is a deemed arrestment for every creditor). Under schedule 7 para 24 provides that if there is an arrestment which takes place 60 days before apparent insolvency or 4 months after apparent insolvency the prior ranking arrestment loses its priority and the two are equalised. So the sequestration is equalised with the creditors arrestment.
⁃ And this rule also applies with corporate insolvency (i.e. liquidation) as a result of s 185 of the Insolvency Act 1986.
- On 16th October there was an arrestment, on 27th November there was an apparent insolvency and 4th January there was sequestration.
- Do a time line*****
- Schedule 7 para 34 says go back 60 days and forward four months, in this case the arrestment is within the 60 day period before apparent insolvency which means that the arrestment is equalised with the sequestration and gets no priority in this case.
- NB this applies not just to sequestration but also applies in liquidation.

23
Q

What is the 60 day rule?

A

The 60 day rule
⁃ s 37(4)
⁃ No arrestment, money attachment, intermix attachment or attachment of the estate of the debtor executed within the period of 60 days before the date of sequestration (and due to s 185 IA 86 also before liquidation) shall be effectual[ The only other place where this terminology is used is in the floating charge legislation. When the floating charge legislation was introduced his intention was that the diligences that would prevail over the floating charge were those which were not struck down by the 60 day rule. But Lord Advocate v RBS was decided before Pepper v Hart and thus the court could not have regard to Hansard in interpreting the intention - which is why the decision does not comply with the intention.] to create a preference for the arrester or attacher. Thus these arrestments and attachments and etc are struck down.

A diligence is effectually executed when it is not struck down by the 60 day
rule in bankruptcy. The intention behind the effectually executed diligence
provision was that any diligence not struck down by the 60 day rule would
have priority over the floating charge.

NB Lord Adv v Rbs is still authority and provides that a floating charge will
take priority over an arrestment, attachment etc.

So any arrestment of attachment which takes place in the 60 days immediately preceding liquidation or sequestration will not be given a priority and in essence will be struck down. 

NB in Exam (Mistakes) - liquidation case people need to include s185 brings s37 of Bankruptcy Act in.

REALLY NEED TO LOOK THIS UP - THE TWO PROVISIONS SEEM TO CONTRADICT EACH OTHER…