7) Free Market Supply Side Policies - MMT Flashcards

1
Q

Why should privatisation shift LRAS to the right?

A

By selling off the state owned assets to the private sector the government hopes and expects these assets to be used more productively. This is because private ownership of LAND, CAPITAL or other resources is perceived as being more productively efficient, due to the fact that they are driven by the profit notice, tend to operate at lower average costs and are less likely to tolerate waste or low standards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why should deregulation shift LRAS to the right?

A

By reducing the amount of regulations that businesses need to observe the government hope and expect businesses to face lower average costs. This is because there is often significant financial and time costs to businesses ensuring they follow the regulations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is deregulation key for?

A

Is a key SSP at promoting more and better ENTERPRISE in the economy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why should reforming the tax system shift LRAS to the right?

A

Reducing businesses taxes (eg corporation tax) may make existing businesses more willing to invest/expand, due to the possible increased profits that they can retain and use. This should mean more investment in LAND, LABOUR and CAPITAL (also higher FDI). Reforming the income tax system (eg lowering taxes, making it less progressive) might incentivise LABOUR to work more and longer as it’s more worth their while

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why should reforming the benefits system shift LRAS to the right?

A

By tightening the rules for claiming benefits, or reducing the payments to those on benefits, the government hopes to incentivise potential benefit claimants to enter or return to the LABOUR MARKET. Also reduced benefit payments increase government funds for other purposes (eg improving education) or else gives them an opportunity to reduce T

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are issues with Privatisation?

A

Privatisation sometimes threatens the quantity and quality of public services. For example, state owned organisation would run loss-making but essential services to remote areas (trains/buses/mail delivery/post offices) which private owned businesses would prefer to stop. Also sometimes in cutting costs privatised businesses might reduce safety standards. For the reason, Network Rate was renationalised, having spent a short time in the private sector

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are issues with Deregulation?

A

As with Privatisation, deregulation often brings with it costs about safety standards, businesses sometimes focusing more on cutting costs than maintain previous standards. Also, excessive deregulation may attract the wrong sort of entrepreneur to the sector (eg cowboy builders) and increase in undesirable risk taking by businesses (eg banking)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are issues with reforming the tax system?

A

Lower tax rates (or fewer taxes) might reduce the amount of revenue earned by the government (Laffer Curve). This could lead to lower G, (inferior public services etc). Alternatively it could mean that G-T is increased, leading to higher budget deficits and a bigger national debt. It could also be argued that lower taxes is a regressive move, ie it benefits the better if more than the disadvantaged in society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are issues with reforming the benefits system?

A

Many of the most vulnerable members of society may be negatively impacted by this move, meaning it can portentously make inequalities worse. In addition, it may mean that workers join the Labour force who are largely unsuited to our negative rate increase in the number of workers is not matched by an increase in output. ( ie productivity suffers)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why should Competition Policy shift LRAS to the right?

A

By ensuring fair competition the government can make life very difficult for monopolies and large oligopolies. Both of these types of business structures can earn supernormal prices at the expense of consumers, households and small businesses. Fairer competition reduces barriers to entry making markets more contestable, therefore improving levels and quality of ENTERPRISE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why should improving the flexibility of the Labour market shift LRAS to the right?

A

By making it easier for businesses to hire and for the workers they need/wage, business recruitment and HR costs are reduced, perhaps leading to an increase in the employment of LABOUR. Also, limiting the power of trade unions could mean that there are less disruptions in the work-place, increasing productivity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are issues with Competition policy?

A

There are fewer arguments against this one! Some businesses are natural monopolies (eg water, railway lines) so attempts to make them more productive may be futile. Large businesses might argue that strict competition rules restrict their ability to achieve economies of scale and may lead to a loss of jobs in the economy and lower levels of I and RDI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are issues with improving the flexibility of the Labour market?

A

This is always controversial. Reducing Trade Union influence will reduce average worker wages, lower RDI and C, AD curve shifting left. Alternatively, earnings could be substituted by borrowing, increasing the debt burden facing households. Either way, a more flexible workforce tilts the balance between employers and workers, perhaps enhancing inequalities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What 6 things does the effectiveness of free market SSPs depend on?

A
  1. Opportunity Cost
  2. Overseas comparisons
  3. Government Failure
  4. Extent of the changes
  5. Economic Position
  6. Unforeseen circumstances
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How can the effectiveness of SSPs depend on Opportunity Cost?

A

Many of these policies may benefit businesses but have negative impact on other economic agents eg consumers, low skilled workers or economically inactive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How can the effectiveness of SSPs depend on Overseas Comparisons?

A

In terms of FDI, the effectiveness of the policies may depend on how the free market supply-side compares with similar countries. For example if the UK corporation tax rates were reduced but were still a lot higher Ireland’s the change may not be successful

17
Q

How can the effectiveness of SSPs depend on Government Failure?

A

Free market SSPs are decided by the government and they are often prone to making bad decisions, maybe due to political bias, maybe due to a lack of full information or maybe due to out of date information.This can render the SSPs less effective than intended

18
Q

How can the effectiveness of SSPs depend on Extent of the changes?

A

As always getting rid of 10 regulations might have minimal impact; getting rid of 1,000 may have a lot. Reducing corporation tax by 1% may not be effective but reducing it by 10% might

19
Q

How can the effectiveness of SSPs depend on the Economic Position?

A

For all of SSPs, their effectiveness is much reduced in a recession or if the economy is operating way below YFe (NOG). In this situation, AD is too low. Shifting AS to the right might only increase the size of any output gap

20
Q

How can the effectiveness of SSPs depend on Unforeseen circumstances?

A

(ceterius paribus): The effectiveness of SSP’s may be reduced by unexpected events (eg OAndemic/War in UKraine) for example, if the UK government suddenly needed extra funds they might have to raise taxes not cut them

21
Q

what are free market economists stance on supply side policies?

A

Free market economists (Austrian) firmly believe that the free market SSPs should be the primary economy function of government. In their eyes, any government intervention is inefficient and stops the market from doing the job it does best ie allocate resources effectively in the economy

22
Q

what are keynesian economists stance on supply side policies?

A

far more sceptical, recognise free market SSPs have a role, their view is AD needs to be managed effectively and government (fiscal policy in particular) is best at doing that