6a Flashcards

1
Q

Peptide sweetners
- neotame
how much more sweeter than sucrose

used in

A

8000-13000x sweeter than sucrose50x sweeter than aspartame

		- approval: Canada (2007) and USA (2002)

		- table top sweetener, chewing gum, 					confectionary products, baked goods, desserts, 
		yogurt, +others
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

alitame- peptide sweetner

how many more times sweeter
made of what 3 compounds
what is its table top sweetner name

A

2000x sweeter than sucrose (Pfizer in 1979)

		- comprised of: L-aspartic acid + D-alanine + amine
		- approval: USA (2002), EU (2009) but not in Canada
		- table top sweetener (Aclame®)
		- production stopped in 2008-09 due to high cost—but you 		can still find it in some countries
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

advantame- peptide sweetner

how many more times sweeter
used in

A

20000x sweeter than sucrose (Ajinomoto)—MSG company

		- approval: USA and EU (May 14, 2014); not in 				Canada  soft drinks, baked goods, frozen desserts, 			 jams/jellies, fruit juices, +others									
			- will foods containing this sweetener require 				labeling for Phe content? There’s so little of it..
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is the advantage of L-carbohydrates
- Lev-O-Cal™: L-fructose, L-glucose and L-sucrose (same sweetness values as the natural D-isomers) –make the enantiomers of normal sugars

disadvantages

A
  • advantage #1: not absorbed/metabolized  non-caloric
    • advantage #2: significant reduction in spoilage bacterial growth in foods (e.g. cured meats such as ham; shelf-life increase of 10 days)  unrecognizable carbon/energy source for many pathogens (e.g. E. Coli O157:H7)
    • problem  all act as laxatives
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Plant Extracts

1. Steviosides and Rebaudiosides

extracted from what?
how much more sweeter than sucrose

table top sweetner name

A
  • extracted from the leaves of Stevia rebaudiana—in the sunflower family, prevalent in Africa/South America, now grown in China
    • 200-300x sweeter than sucrose (about same as aspartame, saccarin)
    • approval: Japan (1970), USA (2008), EU (2011) and Canada (2012)
    • commercial product: Truvia® (95% pure; comprised of nine glycosides)—not complete purity, not single comp
    • ADI: 4 mg/kg bwt (EU)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Plant Extracts

	2. Thaumatin 
extracted from what
how much more sweeter than sucrose
table top name
used in 
stability
A
  • protein (glycoprotein) isolated/extracted from katemfe fruit seeds –china
    • 2000-2500x sweeter than sucrose (slow building sweet taste response that leaves a liquorice (licorice)-like aftertaste, not immediate
    • approval: UK (1970), EU (1988), USA (2008) and Canada (2009)
    • commercial product: Talin®–minimally processed foods
    • food usage: chewing gum, breath fresheners, flavourings and as a salt substitute (not really fair to call it this, more like an aid to enhance the flavor response )
  • Heat and pH labile [>75 degrees; pH<2.5]processed foods ? How valuable? (easily broken down)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Factors Influencing Non-nutritive (Artificial/Synthetic) Sweetener Choice.
8

A

(a) allowed uses and level/concentration
(b) product thermal processing regimestability
(c) product pHstability
(d) required/desired product shelf-life decrease in sweetness over time
(e) required/desired sweetener functions sweetness alone/balance (acids)
(f) cost (consider differentials)
(g) flavormetallic/bitter (mix of sweeteners)
(h) marketing natural/synthetic; structure (Phe) wow factor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

(f) cost (per packet/retail, what we pay in store):

saccharin/cyclamate:	$0.03—synthetic 
aspartame:			$0.04
acesulfame K/sucralose:	$0.06
stevia (truvia):		$0.09—natural is 3x price
A

d

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Impact of non-nutritive sweeteners on food product formulations.

what will have to be considered or changed when these products are addedd to the food

A

(a) minor/major changes in acidulant (e.g. citric acid) concentration so as to balance sweet:sour taste response
(b) minor/major changes in flavour profile adjustment to minimize the non-sweet taste notes (e.g. bitter, metallic) of these compounds
(c) significant changes so as to add ‘mouthfeel’ (‘body’) or weight/volume to the low calorie product and to ensure product stability/consumer acceptance  “bulking agents” or “fillers” and emulsifiers  reformulation and repackaging

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are the bulking agents added to non-nutritive sweetners
polydextrose
maltodextrin
) modified cellulose (e.g. methylcellulose [E461])

A

(a) polydextrose [E1200]: industrially synthesized polymer comprised of 89% D-glucose, 10% sorbitol and 1% citric acidheated up to form polymers, 3D structure
- these monomers are linked in a fashion that are not recognized by digestive enzymes  1.06 calories/g (~75% caloric reduction)
- classified as “soluble fibre” / dietary fibre
- trade names: Sta-Lite® (Tate & Lyle); Litesse® (Danisco, DuPont); Trimcal™ (C&H Ingredients)  different structures
- has/have food additive status in Canada

) maltodextrin: industrially produced from starch employing enzymes and/or acid  repolymerization containing random ,  12; 13; 14 and 16 D-glucose linkages (molecular mass of ~2,000 D)

- resistant to digestive enzymes (Resistant Starch 4 [RS4]: chemically modified resistant starch)  1.5 calories/g (62.5% reduction in calories)
- classified as “soluble fibre” / dietary fibre 
- trade name: Fibersol® (ADM/Matsutani; major commercial product) 
- starch-based so is not a food additive in Canada
(c) modified cellulose (e.g. methylcellulose [E461])
- resistant to digestive enzymes (-14 glycosidic linkage)  no 	caloric value
- classified as “insoluble dietary fibre” difficult to get it to interact with water, so have to get chemical derivatives (methylate it) 
- has food additive status in Canada

(d) water (“filler”) (e) Air (no weight)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

polydextrose

made up of

A

polydextrose [E1200]: industrially synthesized polymer comprised of 89% D-glucose, 10% sorbitol and 1% citric acidheated up to form polymers, 3D structure

- these monomers are linked in a fashion that are not 	recognized 	by digestive enzymes  1.06 calories/g 	(~75% caloric reduction)
- classified as “soluble fibre” / dietary fibre 
- trade names: Sta-Lite® (Tate &amp; Lyle); Litesse® (Danisco, 	DuPont); Trimcal™ (C&amp;H Ingredients)  different structures
- has/have food additive status in Canada
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

maltodextrin:

A

industrially produced from starch employing enzymes and/or acid  repolymerization containing random ,  12; 13; 14 and 16 D-glucose linkages (molecular mass of ~2,000 D)

- resistant to digestive enzymes (Resistant Starch 4 [RS4]: chemically modified resistant starch)  1.5 calories/g (62.5% reduction in calories)
- classified as “soluble fibre” / dietary fibre 
- trade name: Fibersol® (ADM/Matsutani; major commercial product) 
- starch-based so is not a food additive in Canada
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Bulking Agents

A

(c) modified cellulose (e.g. methylcellulose [E461])
- resistant to digestive enzymes (-14 glycosidic linkage)  no caloric value
- classified as “insoluble dietary fibre” difficult to get it to interact with water, so have to get chemical derivatives (methylate it)
- has food additive status in Canada

(d) water (“filler”) (e) Air (no weight)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly