6.3 Religion and science debates Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

John Polkinghorne

A

I believe that God acts in the world, but he is not a show off conjurer who violates the same laws of nature that he made.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Genesis 1:1-3

A

In the beginning, God created the heavens and earth. Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters. And God said ‘Let there be light’, and there was light

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Richard Dawkins

A

The universe that we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but pitiless indifference.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Scientific methodology

A
  1. OBSERVATION (Newton sees an apple fall from a tree)
  2. HYPOTHESIS (There might be some force that attracts the smaller object (the apple) to the larger (earth)
  3. Experimentation (repeated testing and formulation of a law)

Science uses inductive and deductive reasoning
- No inductive argument can ever be a proof cos we can never be sure we have all the possible observations)
- With deduction the conclusions are right if the premises are right.
Although neither arguments are infallible, most people regard scientific findings as reliable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Religious methodology

A

Religion is based on belief and faith. TWO APPROACHES on how we can be sure our be sure our beliefs are true.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

FIDEISTS

A
  • Draw on personal religious experience.
  • Do not need empirical evidence for what they believe - all they need is the belief itself.
  • To seek the kind of verification (proof) that Aquinas offers in his five ways denies the very point of faith
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

CRITICICAL RATIONALISTS

A
  • Accept that in order to be coherent, belief must pass two tests: they must be rational, they must not go against empirical science.
  • uses both inductive and deductive reasoning to support religious belief.

Cosmo & Design argue through observation of the world, we can conclude God is the best explanation for what we see in the universe

Onto uses deductive argument for the existence of God (most philosophers think this fails)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Weaknesses of Religious Method

A
  1. It’s results are not repeatable. It is not possible to rerun a religious experience and determine what it was like or whether the experiencer was lying or subject to mass-hysteria.
  2. It is possible to induce religious feelings by stimulating parts of the brain, raising possibilities that religious sense is just something the brain does.
  3. Intense religious experiences may just be abnormal brain function.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Evidence from miracles

A

Aquinas states miracles are DONE BY DIVINE NATURE and it is never just a coincidence. The cause remains hidden because it is God.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Hume on miracles

A
  • A miracle breaks a law of nature
  • Brought about by God or some kind of invisible agent
  • It happens through God’s will (has a purpose)
    He felt a miracle is a willed act and a transgression of a law of nature. The miracle has a purposeful dimension.
    Hume (a sceptic) has a working definition of a miracle: CAUSED BY GOD BREAKS LAWS OF NATURE VERIFIABLE PURPOSEFUL
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

God of the Gaps

A

In pre-scientific communities, very little was known scientifically, so God was called upon to explain the gaps in knowledge.
With advances in scientific knowledge, God has been pushed out of most of these gaps.
Scientific development will one day explain all such gaps and will make the idea of God completely redundant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Big Bang Theory

A

The model for the beginning of the universe that best fits scientific evidence. Everything in the universe was formed off the singularity, an explosion 13.7 billion years ago. We know this explosion is still going on as the universe is expanding.
The universe started with all of its matter concentrated at a single point which was incredibly dense and hot. The theory has nothing to say about where the matter came from or how it came into place.
As the material expanded from the point of the Big Bang, it cooled. Somewhere around 400 million years after the big bang, the first stars started to form. Stars have been evolving since.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The Big Bang’s challenge to religious belief

A
  • A Big Bang that happened 13.7 years ago contradicts the bibles description of a six-day creation a few thousand years ago.
  • If the Bible could be wrong about creation is it wrong about other things too?
  • If we reject the biblical account of creation, should we not also reject other tenants of Christian belief e.g. the trinity?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Steady State Theory

A

An alternative model to the big bang created in the 1950’s. The theory suggested that the universe has always existed (and will always exist) in more or less the state that we see it now, because new matter is continually coming into existence in order to compensate for the death of stars elsewhere.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Creationism

A

SCIENCE UNDERMINES THE GENESIS CREATION STORY IN A NUMBER OF WAYS: 1. The order of creation contradicts the findings of evolutionary science. 2. Animals are created as fully formed species BUT the geological record shows this was not the case.

Creationists reject the scientific method developed for the absolute dating of organic and inorganic things and regard the bible record as complete and accurate in every detail e.g. Adam and Eve are ancestors of the entire human race.

Creation takes a long stand on religious belief. Those who want to believe in some of the Bible’s doctrines must accept the complete authority of the Bible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Arguments against Creationism

A
  • The scientific evidence for evolution seems to be overwhelming
  • Creation is six days is really just an association with Shabbat.
  • The Biblical flood is a memory of a cataclysmic event in the religion, but the occurrence of any comparable disaster cannot be taken as evidence that there was a worldwide flood caused by God as a punishment for sin.
15
Q

Miracles - scientific viewpoint

A

A miracle would break scientific laws, therefore it cannot happen. Miracles stem from lack of knowledge. Someone would argue Jesus did not walk on water but submerged stones. A believer may acknowledge some miracles may be explained in this way but others cannot.

16
Q

Spinoza’s general scientific argument against miracles

A

P1. Miracles are violations of the laws of nature.
P2. Natural laws are immutable, they never change
P3. Immutable laws cannot be violated otherwise there can be no basis for science.
C. Therefore miracles are impossible absurdities.

17
Q

Strengths of scientific position

A
  • Science can use reliable methods to test miracle claims.
  • Spinoza’s argument is powerful because it uses the obvious truth that if scientific laws really are violated by miracles then there can be no basis for science.
  • Science works by dealing with what is general and repeatable. Miracles are weak evidence by comparison with scientific evidence.
  • The God of the Gaps idea gives a convincing explanation where the miracle stories came from.
18
Q

Weaknesses of scientific position

A
  • If miracles do happen, science can’t investigate becuase they are beyond the laws of nature.
  • Spinoza’s argument is weak. Science cannot prove natural laws are immutable.
  • Scientific understanding of God of the Gaps misses the point of miracles, that they have a purpose. They are demonstration’s of God’s power and love.
19
Q

Evolutionary theory - Charles Darwin

A
  • Darwin proposed that nature ‘selects’ those characteristics of a plant or animal that make it more likely to survive so those characteristics get passed onto succeeding generations.

Dawkins ideas are on the basis of modern biology and explain why there is a huge diversity of species in the world.

Evolution is gradually working through small genetic changes known as recombination - ordered by natural selection.

20
Q

Evolutionary theory’s challenge to traditional Christian thinking

A
  • According to Genesis human beings are the peak of creation. In ET, humans are simply organisms that have emerged over a period of time as a process that started with single cell organisms.
  • Humans are just a product of evolution like other animals and have no dominion.
  • There is nothing special about human beings beyond superior intelligence.
  • There could not have been a single ancestral pair, Adam and Eve, from which we all descend.
  • We do not need God to explain the process of evolution - it works through the genes.
21
Q

Dawkins

A
  • Darwinism shows evolution to be a ‘blind’ process that happens purely by the chance process of natural selection. The only watchmaker in nature is physics.
  • If the existence of complex organisms require an explanation then so does the existence of God because God has to be more complex than the things he designs.
  • For Dawkins, the idea that a personal God communicates with his creation is merely wishful thinking: possibly a comfort to the dying but of no other value.