(6) ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿง’โ€๐Ÿง’ situational explanations for obedience Flashcards

1
Q

Milgram proposed destructive authority occurs because..?

A
  • individual is in an agentic state

agentic state - doesnโ€™t take responsibility for their actions as they believe theyโ€™re acting on behalf of someone else (therefore, theyโ€™re an agent).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

whatโ€™s the opposite of being in an agentic state?

A
  • being in an autonomous state

autonomous state: when individual behaves according to own principles and takes responsibility for own actions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is agentic shift, and who was it proposed by?

A
  • Milgram (1973)
  • when a person shifts from autonomous state to an agentic state as they percieve someone as an authorative figure with higher position in social heriachy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what causes people to stay in an agentic state?

provide an example relating to Milgrams study

A

binding factors - aspects of the situation that let people downplay or overlook the harm of their actions, reducing moral strain.

e.g. shifting responsibility to the victim as they chose to volunteer for the study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is legitimacy of authority?

A

idea that others higher up the social hierarchy should be obeyed, as allows society to function smoothly
(eg: some believe police have the right to punish/harm others).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

why is legitimacy of authority dangerous?

A

when legitimate authorities become destructive (e.g. leaders such as Hitler and Stalin), people will obey destructive orders = cruel and dangerous consequences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

โœ… - research support for the agentic state mentality

A

E: In Milgramโ€™s studies, Pโ€™s sometimes resisted giving shocks and asked who was responsible for harm. AFter E took responsibility, Ps often went through procedure without further objections.

E: as Milgram suggested, once Ps no longer took responsibility for own actions, were able to follow destructive authority easily.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

โŒ - agentic state is not supported by real world events.

A

E: Mandel (1998) describes how members of German Reserve Police Battalion 101 murdered civilians without being directly ordered to. given choice so acted autonomously.

E: Milgramโ€™s explanation of the agentic state is oversimplified, other factors like racism or hatred, played a role in their actions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

โœ… - legitimacy of authority is supported by real world examples + ๐Ÿฆ„

A

E a commanding officersโ€™ recognised authority allows them to issue orders and punishments, which soldiers, acknowledging their subordinate status, unquestioningly follow.

E: supports idea that respect of legitimate authority can result in blind and destructive obedience.

๐Ÿฆ„: arguing obedience is due to situational variables is an oversimplification and could be used as an excuse for evil behaviour and as a way to not take responsibility for harmful behaviours.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly