6 - Political Economy Flashcards
Suggest two social choice problem
- Preference revelation
- Aggregating preferences
Explain social choice problem 1: preference revelation
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d668a/d668a811098fc63c44f7c409e08610b68c3ec6a7" alt=""
Explain Gibbard-Satterthwaite Theorem
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2214b/2214b89f6677f53ffdc29bc3128ad1b9eb2430d8" alt=""
1) Explain the social choice problem 2: aggregating preferences
2) Which 3 conditions should consistent aggregation needs to fulfill?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b07b3/b07b3ae39dacfa50371b4706a1698ac7646378de" alt=""
1) Evaluate voting as a preference aggregator
2) Can voting produce a consistent aggregation of preferene?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/457eb/457ebeed15003d6ab2eab99dec726d5879b3caa2" alt=""
Why voting equilibrium is not guaranteed?
(revise question)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4598/f4598cb701a36ab413fcf3b425a27c8f0682080f" alt=""
Condorcet Paradox
- Majority voting does not lead to stable outcome
- Example:
- Voting on police spending by 3 individuals
- Can choose high (H), medium (M) or low (L) level of spendin
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0d31/f0d31a8549879d61a4a58f6e48657e1b7697bb87" alt=""
Explain Arrow’s impossibility theorem (1951)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97722/97722a60b963c46daae2cebdd21b7b5f489b9ddd" alt=""
Explain median voter theorem
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6c2f/d6c2f4b2a258d1be72a6e83e19c2935006eca9a5" alt=""
Explain single-peaked preferences
Single-peaked preferences are a kind of preference relations. A group of agents is said to have single-peaked-preferences if:
- Each agent has an ideal choice in the set; and
- For each agent, outcomes that are further from his ideal choice are preferred less.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/203a3/203a3033f7e62ec1e0917cf87065a6e83e6dec41" alt=""
Median voter outcome in the public goods example: efficiency
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1fc7/e1fc7b17931d17b8d925753dd0c508057408147e" alt=""
**Taxation and Transfer
Derive the tax rate that maximises workers’ utility
MT Lecture 6 P.17
Explain corruption as an agency problem
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52942/52942c2c521e5e13d40436ea56c8a1511343ef25" alt=""
Explain Olken (2006) experiment of a large anti-poverty program regarding corruption
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4892c/4892c2659a80575333f8f0c43fa6705bb1620936" alt=""
Explain Bertrand (2007) experiment on corruption
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/760eb/760eb9c12e5522848a468622dc494d09596c6441" alt=""
Explain electoral accountability
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2541e/2541e73f8cc6af987dd0389a0b9d93d442524f8c" alt=""
Special-interest policies (Becker 1963)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6339/a6339d1f80f4117806f1d0c1691e419f4a3b822b" alt=""
When should government provide a service inhouse and when to contract it out?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f5e6/7f5e67b393d315b165bd712363b61efebcd40c82" alt=""
New contract theory
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76302/763023300c18b517c54a20fff7bb444945a8feaf" alt=""
Privatization vs state provision
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/228d8/228d8a48dae3bd7441cbc7f7ebc5e69baf8bebad" alt=""
Summary of Political economy
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4daa2/4daa21732a8888d47400e7dbfe9aa122c25bc866" alt=""