6. Performance, Modification, & Excuse Flashcards
What is a condition to the buyer’s duty to accept and pay for goods?
The seller’s tender of delivery.
What is a condition to the seller’s duty to tender delivery?
Buyer’s tender of payment.
What are non-carrier cases,
what must the seller do?
Non-carrier cases are contracts in which it appears that the parties DO NOT intend for the goods to be moved by common carrier.
In non-carrier cases, the seller MUST:
* Make conforming goods available to the buyer
* Provide necessary notifications for delivery
* Allow a reasonable time for the buyer to take possession.
What are the requirements for a seller’s tender of goods?
- At a reasonable hour
- Goods kept available for the period reasonably necessary for buyer to take possession.
What must the buyer furnish to receive the goods?
Facilities reasonably suited to RECEIVING the goods.
What characterizes carrier cases?
Contracts where the parties intend for the goods to be moved by common carrier.
What are the seller’s duties in a shipment contract?
Unless otherwise specified, contracts are presumed to be shipment contracts where the contract requires shipment by a third-party carrier. Here, the seller’s duties are:
1. Put the goods in possession of a carrier
2. Arrange transportation to the buyer
3. Provide necessary documents for possession
4. Promptly notify the buyer that goods have been shipped.
Failure to notify or arrange proper shipment ONLY justifies rejection if
it causes material delay or loss.
In a shipment contract, when does the risk of loss pass from the seller to the buyer?
When the seller duly delivers the goods to the third-party carrier.
What are the obligations of the seller in a destination contract?
- Deliver conforming goods to a specific destination
- Put and hold conforming goods at the buyer’s disposition at the specific location
- Provide necessary notice of tender
- Furnish required documents for the buyer to receive delivery.
What does F.O.B., Seller’s Place of Shipment stand for and what are its implications?
Free On Board contract at the seller’s place of shipment, the seller’s need ONLY, at his expense and risk, put the goods in possession of the carrier.
In an F.O.B. contract at the seller’s place of shipment, who bears the risk of loss?
The buyer bears the risk of loss if goods are damaged in transit.
what are the implications of F.O.B., the destination?
If the contract is F.O.B. the destination, the seller MUST, at his expense and risk, tender delivery of the goods at the destination location.
In an F.O.B. the destination, who bears the risk of loss?
The seller bears the risk of loss if goods are damaged in transit.
Free alongside contracts
In contracts that specify the delivery is free alongside (i.e., “F.A.S.”), the seller MUST:
i.) deliver the goods alongside the vessel (i.e., in the manner usual at the port of delivery); or
ii.) on a dock designated by the buyer; and
iii.) obtain and tender a receipt for the goods.
What is the buyer’s duty regarding payment?
The buyer’s tender of payment is a condition to the seller’s duty to tender and complete delivery.
When are tender of goods effected?
Tender is effected when the seller:
i.) makes conforming goods available for the buyer’s disposition; and
ii.) gives the buyer notice sufficient to enable the buyer to take delivery
What constitutes a sufficient tender of payment?
When made by any means current in ordinary business unless the seller demands cash and gives a reasonable extension of time.
What is the rule regarding a buyer’s payment by check?
It is conditional and will be defeated if the check is NOT honored upon presentment.
What rights does a buyer have regarding inspection of goods?
The buyer has a right to inspect goods upon tender or delivery BEFORE making payment or acceptance.
Non-effects of Contracts Requiring Payment Before Inspection
Payment before inspection DOES NOT count as:
- acceptance of goods
or
- limit the buyer’s inspection rights and remedies
If a contract requires payment before inspection, when can nonconformity of the goods excuse payment?
- Nonconformity appears without inspection
- Documents are forged or materially fraudulent.
In a shipment contract, when does the buyer’s risk of loss pass?
When the goods are delivered to the carrier.
In a destination contract, when does the buyer’s risk of loss pass?
When the goods are tendered at a particular destination by the carrier.
What happens if goods are totally destroyed before the risk of loss passes to a buyer and without the fault of either party?
The contract is VOID and both parties are relieved of obligations.
Buyer’s Risk of Loss-Bailee
If the goods are held by a bailee to be delivered without being moved, the risk of loss passes to the buyer when:
(1) buyer receives a negotiable document of title covering the goods;
(2) when the bailee acknowledges the buyer’s right to possess the goods; or
(3) AFTER the buyer receives a nonnegotiable document of title or other written direction to deliver the goods to the buyer, once the buyer has had a reasonable time to present the document or direction to the bailee.
Buyer’s Risk of Loss When Seller is A Merchant
If the seller is a merchant, the risk of loss passes to the buyer when the buyer receives (i.e., takes physical possession of) the goods.
Buyer’s Risk of Loss When Seller is NOT a Merchant
If the seller is NOT a merchant, the risk of loss passes to the buyer upon tender of delivery.
Effect of Breach on Risk of Loss
What is the rule regarding seller’s nonconforming tender or delivery?
Risk of loss remains on the seller until cure or acceptance.
Effect of Breach on Breach of Risk
What is the rule regarding Buyer rightful revocation of seller’s goods?
If the buyer rightfully revokes acceptance, the buyer may to the extent of any deficiency in his effective insurance coverage-treat the risk of loss as having been on the seller from the beginning
Effect of Breach on Breach of Risk
What is the rule regarding Buyer’s breach before the risk of loss passes to the buyer?
If the buyer breaches before the risk of loss passes to the buyer, the seller may—to the extent of any deficiency in her effective insurance coverage-treat the risk of loss as resting on the buyer for a commercially reasonable time
What is required for modification of a contract governed by common law?
- Mutual assent
- Consideration.
Under what conditions can a unilateral or mutual modification occur without consideration at common law?
- Due to unanticipated circumstances
- Fair and equitable.
Unilateral or Mutual Modification without Consideration at Common Law
A unilateral or mutual Modification without consideration is permitted if:
(i) the modification is due to circumstances that were unanticipated by the parties when the contract was made; and
(ii) it is fair and equitable.
where there is an unforeseen difficulty so severe it rises to the level of impracticability, the consideration required for modification will be considered satisfied by the party’s promise to complete their pre-existing contractual duty.
To be impracticable, the performing party needs to have encountered extreme and unreasonable difficulty or expense that was not anticipated at the time of formation.
Exceptions to the Preexisting Duty Rule;
Mutual Modification-Increased Compensation
A promise to increase compensation under an existing contract is enforceable as a mutual modification to the contract if:
i.) both parties agree to a performance that is different from the one required by the original contract; and
ii.) The difference in performance is NOT a mere pretense of a newly formed bargain.
Exceptions to the Preexisting Duty Rule;
Unforeseen Circumstances-Increased Compensation
If a promise for increased compensation is made in return for a performance that becomes significantly more burdensome than initially expected by both parties, the preexisting duty rule does NOT apply.
What does the UCC state regarding modifications of contracts for the sale of goods?
No consideration is needed for an agreement modifying an existing contract.
Modifications MUST, however, meet the UCC’s good-faith test, and a failure to do so will render them unenforceable.
The good-faith test for modifications applies even to modifications that are supported by consideration.
Two violations of the obligation of good faith for UCC Modifications
With respect to modifications, good faith is violated by:
i.) use of bad faith to escape performance on the original contract terms; and
ii.) the extortion of a ‘modification’ WITHOUT legitimate commercial reason.
What can invalidate an oral modification under a contract with a ‘no oral modifications’ clause?
The presence of such a clause can affect enforceability.
There is NO specific language required for this type of provision. “No oral modifications,” “all modifications must be in writing” or any such similar language would suffice.
UCC and Subsequent Oral Modifications
Under Section 2-209, clauses prohibiting subsequent oral modifications are presumptively valid.
An oral modification made in violation of such a clause may nevertheless be enforceable if the disadvantaged party relies on the modification or the parties perform in accordance therewith.
Section C: Excusing Performance Due to Faulty Assumptions
Faulty Assumptions about Present Facts
What is a unilateral mistake in contracting?
a party operating under a faulty assumption about material facts at the time of contracting is NOT excused from their obligations UNLESS:
i.) the other party KNEW OR had REASON to KNOW of the mistake; or
ii.) the mistake was a clerical error.
In all unilateral mistake situations, if the non-mistaken party is aware of the other party’s mistake and takes advantage of the innocent party’s mistake, the contract is ___________
VOIDABLE at the discretion of the mistaken party.
Rescission is available only when _______________ about the unilateral mistake.
the non-mistaken party knows or should have known
Unilateral Mistakes in an Offer
If a mistake is made in an offer, and the offeree is or should be aware of the mistake, there will be NO contract.
The offeree is NOT allowed to take advantage of the error.
What are three requirements for a mutual mistake to void a contract?
- Mistake concerns a basic assumption on which the contract was made.
- Material effect on agreed exchange of performances;
- Disadvantaged party did not assume the risk of the mistake
In mutual mistake, the party wishing to avoid the contract must show that ___________________
the resulting imbalance in the agreed exchange is so severe that he cannot fairly be required to carry it out
The general test for when a mutual mistake relates to the basic assumption on which the contract is founded is if one party will get _____________.
an unexpected, unbargained-for gain and the other party will suffer an unexpected loss.
Under mutual mistake, A disadvantaged party will not be able to avoid the contract if the risk of that mistake was and still is allocated to him.
The risk can be re-allocated to the other party in three ways:
(i) by agreement of the parties;
(ii) when a party is aware at the time the contract is made that he has only limited knowledge with respect to the facts related to the mistake but treats his limited knowledge as sufficient; or
(iii) the risk is allocated by the court as is reasonable under the circumstances.
True or False:Market conditions and financial ability are NOT considered assumptions that are basic to the contract, and a mutual mistake on those terms will NOT void the contract.
True.
If the party seeking to avoid enforcement of the contract on the basis of mutual mistake is the one who originally took on the risk that there might be a mistake, he will NOT be able to raise a mutual mistake defense.
This commonly occurs where:
i.) one party is in a better position to know the risks than the other party (e.g., contractor vs. homeowner);
or
ii.) the parties knew their assumption was doubtful (i.e., the parties were consciously aware of their ignorance).
To be a defense, it MUST truly be a mistake, NOT uncertainty.
Faulty Assumption of Future Facts
What is the doctrine of impossibility in contract law?
It releases both parties from obligations if performance becomes:
i.) objectively impossible due to unforeseen events AFTER the contract’s formation;
ii.) Performance under the contract becomes literally impossible due to circumstances BEYOND the parties’ control; and
iii.) the contingency was UNKNOWN at the time of contracting.
What is subjective impossibility?
Occurs when performance becomes impossible due to the fault of the performing party.
Under those circumstances, the performance obligation is NOT EXCUSED and will be considered as a breach of the contract.
What are the two types of unknown contingency of impossibility that can occur?
- Supervening Contingency: performance was possible at contracting but later became impossible. party’s performance is made impracticable without his fault due to the occurrence of an event, the non-occurrence of which was a basic assumption on which the contract was made
- Existing Contingency: a contingency existed at contracting but was unknown to the parties.
What are the damages for when a contract has been rescinded on grounds of supervening impossibility?
a party may obtain restitution of any benefit conferred by way of party performance of the contract.
The doctrine of impossibility will NOT apply where:
i.) the parties have allocated the risk of the contingency and provided remedial measures in the event of its occurrence;
ii.) If events render performance ONLY temporarily impossible, then this will typically ONLY suspend the obligations of the parties UNTIL the impossibility ends; or
iii.) pending laws that haven’t taken effect at the time of the contract or transaction
What are the three main categories of impossibility?
- Destruction of the subject matter of the contract
- Death or incapacity
- Illegality
True or False: The doctrine of impossibility applies when parties have allocated the risk of a contingency.
False
Faulty Assumptions of Future Facts
What is impracticability?
A promisor may be excused from performance where unforeseen difficulties have made performance prohibitively expensive or otherwise extremely burdensome.
i.) the impracticability of the performance was caused by some unforeseen contingency;
ii.) The risk was neither assumed nor allocated by the parties; and
iii.) the increase in the cost of performance would be far beyond what either party anticipated.
What does temporary impracticability do to contractual duties?
When will duty NOT “spring back”?
It suspends contractual duties, but does NOT discharge them.
When performance becomes possible again following impracticability, the duty “springs back” into existence.
Duty will NOT spring back into existence if the burden on either party to the contract would be substantially increased or different from that originally contemplated.
Under UCC 2-615, what happens if the sale of goods becomes impossible or commercially impracticable?
unless otherwise agreed, delay or non-delivery by a seller is not a breach of a contract of sale where performance has been made impracticable by the occurrence of an event the non-occurrence of which was a basic assumption of the contract.
This test is designed to allow courts to allocate risk between the parties, based on what the court thinks parties would have done if they had planned for the contingency that is currently making performance impracticable
Excuse on grounds of impracticability will not be available, when
if the event in question was sufficiently foreshadowed so as to fairly be viewed as part of the risks that the seller assumed when entering into the contract.
What is required for increased cost to excuse performance under UCC?
Increased cost alone does NOT excuse performance UNLESS:
1. The rise in cost is due to an unforeseeable contingency
2. Alters the essential nature of performance