6. Evidence needed and disclosure steps required in commencing, responding to, progressing or defending a claim Flashcards

a. Relevance, hearsay and admissibility b. The burden and standard of proof c. Expert evidence (opinion evidence, duties of experts, single joint experts, discussion between experts) d. Witness statements e. Affidavits f. Standard disclosure g. Orders for disclosure h. Specific disclosure i. Pre-action and non-party disclosure j. Electronic disclosure k. Privilege and without prejudice communications l. Waiver of privilege

1
Q

What is the burden and standard of proof in civil proceedings?

A

On the party making the allegation (usually C), but can be D if counterclaim or allege CN.

The standard is on the balance of probabilities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the general principle for civil evidence?

A

That if a piece if relevant to the proceedings, then it is admissible.

Which measn a party is allowed to present it at the court for them to consider.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the two exceptions to admissible evidence?

A
  1. Hearsay evidence
  2. Opinion Evidence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is opinion evidence?

A

Witnesses can only give evidence based on the facts of the cas enot heir own personal viewpoint.

It will usually be inadmissiable unless it falls into one of the exceptions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When is opinion evidence be admissible?

A
  1. Evidence based on facts that are personally perceived by the witness.
    - It was cold - admissible.
    - It was too cold to think about driving that date - inadmissible.

If it does not draw of the witnesses values, its more likely to be admissible.

  1. Expert Opinion Evidence.
    On any relevant matter that the expert is QUALIFIED to give their opinion - in must be within their qualified area of expertise.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is hearsay evidence?

A

A statement made outside of court that is repeated in court by somebody who did not originally make the statement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What questions should be asked about whether the hearsay is (in)admissible?

A
  1. Does the evidence fall under the defintion of hearsay?
  2. Is the hearsay evidence admissible according to the test?
  3. Have the procedural requirements to use hearsay been complied with?
  4. What weight will the court likely attach to the hearsay evidence?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When does the evidence fall under the defintion of hearsay?

A

The statement itself (not the person making it) must be related to a relevant fact or be an admissible opinion.

Must be a statement made out of court, repeated by somebody in court, to prove the truth of the matter stated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When is the hearsay evidence admissible according to the test?

A

Under s1 Civil Evidence Act - Where it:

  • Relates to a relevnt fact;
  • Is not repetition of an opinion that is not a perception of the facts.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the procedural requirements for hearsay?

A

Party wishing to rely must give notice to the other parties.

The notice requirements depend on whether the party is intending to call the witness to give oral evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the notice requirements if intending to call witness to give oral evidence?

A

The witness statment containing the hearsay evidence must be served on the other party.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the notice requirements if not intending to call witness to give oral evidence?

A

The whole of that witnesses statment becomes hearsay!

Party wishing to rely must serve a
- separate formal notice withness the witness satment identifying hearsay evidence, confirming that they wish to rely on it at trial and giving reasons why the witness will not be called.

Party served with the notice
- can ask the court to order that the witness be called in order to cross-examine them on their evidence; or

  • serve a notice to attack credibility within 14 days of being served the hearsay notice
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What happens if there is a failure to serve notice of hearsay?

A

The evidence will still be admissible, however it may affect the weighting that the court attaches it at the final trial.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What weight is the court likely to attach to the hearsay evidence?

A

Will take into account:

  • The reason that the witness has not been able to attend.
    Unless v good reason, court unlikely to give much weight if person does not attend to be questioned on it.
  • Whether the original statement was made at the same time as the relevnt fact.
  • Whether the evidence involves multiple hearsay.
  • Whether any person involved had any motive to conceal or misrepresent matters.
  • Whether the original statement was an edited account or was made in collaboration with someone else.
  • Whether the party seeking to rely has given proper notice.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is notice to attack credibility?

A

A document which notifies a party that the opponent wishes to challenge their witness testimony on the basis that the witness it unrealiable, untrustworthy or biased.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is multiple hearsay?

A

Where the information has passed through multiple people.

He said that she said that they said etc..

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is the structure of a witness statement?

A
  1. Top of the first page.
  2. Introduction to the main body of the statement.
  3. Main body of witness statement.
  4. Final section and statement of truth.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is included at the top of the first page?

A
  • The party on whose behalf it was made.
  • Initials and surname of witness.
  • The number of the statement in relation to the witness.
  • The identifying intitials and number of each document.
  • Date statement was made.
  • Date of any translation.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is included in the introduction to the main body of text?

A

Must be drafted in the 1st person.
Must state:
- Full name of witness
- Place of residence
- Occupation
- That they’re either party, or an employee, of party to proceedings
- Process in preparing WS (face/telephone/interpreter)

20
Q

What is included in the main body of text?

A
  • Facts and dates of the witnesses story in chronological order
  • Which statements are made from witnesses own knowledge and which are information or beliefs
  • The source of any matters which are information or beliefs
21
Q

What is included in the final section of WS?

A

Statement of truth to verify the statement.

If SOT is provided witness generally attends trial.

Post trial witness will take the oath or affirm the contents of their statments.

22
Q

Can a party rely on witness evidence without the court’s permission?

A

NO - must have permission of the court.

Usually given when court gives initital directions, but can be requested at any point in proceedings.

23
Q

What is expert evidence restricted to?

A

What is reasonably required to resolve the proceedings.

Experts have an overriding duty to assist the court and this means they should not be tempted to amend report to be more favourable to ta party’s case.

24
Q

Should parties appoint a single joint expert?

A

Yes, when practical and inline with the OO.

If parties cannot agree on one, the court can order the use of one taking into account:

  • amount in dispute
  • importance to the parties
  • complexity of the issues
25
Q

What should an expert report contain?

A
  • Details of their qualifications
  • Information relied on in the making of the report
  • Statement setting out substance of facts and instructions
  • Highlight which facts in report and within the expert’s own knowledge
  • State who carried out any examination and whether this was under the expert’s supervision
  • Summarise differing opinions and give reasons for expert’s
  • Summary of the conclusion reached
  • Statement of compliance of duty to the court and aware of their requirements
  • Verified by a SoT
26
Q

What are the options if a party is disatisfied with the expert report?

A
  • Instruct another expert (need court permission to rely on it in proceedings)
  • Cross-examine the export to expose weaknesses and inconsistencies in report
  • Obtain a second report and send to the expert - cannot be produced for the court
27
Q

With multiple experts, what happens after exhange of reports?

A

Discussion Between the experts:
- Encouraged to meet and discuss contents of their reports (can be ordered by court).
- Identify issues and they agree and disagree on.

Questions to experts:
- Parties can ask the opposition expert questions within 28 days of the report being served on them.
- No timeframe for expert to respond in.

28
Q

What is Disclosure?

A

The process by which a party informs another party that they possess a particular document.

Parties are under a duty to search for documents.

Duty to disclose is limited to the documents that are in that party’s control.

29
Q

What is Inspection?

A

Refers to the right of the othr party to receive copies of a documents that has been disclosed.

30
Q

What is a document?

A

Anything in which information can be recorded.

Very widely defined, could be email, USB, video or info on a hardrive for example.

31
Q

What is the duty to search?

A

All parties are under a duty to make a reasonable serch for all documents required under disclosure.

Reasonable means giving consideration to issues such as number of documents, nature and complexity of the proceedings, and the ease and expense of finding the particular document.

Extent if search can be limited by a party but ONLY where it can be justified.

32
Q

What is a party obliged to disclose?

A

General rule is that a party must disclose documents on which they intend to rely that adversely affect their own case, adversely affect another party’s case, support another party’s case or are required to be disclosed by a relevant PD.

This is standard disclosure.

33
Q

What is standard disclosure?

A

Only documents are those which are relevant to the matters in dispute.

This is the most common type and is the default position unless the court orders otherwise.

34
Q

What is the court’s approach to disclosure in the small claims track?

A

Each party at least 14 days before the final hearing will file and serve on every other party copies of all documents.

35
Q

What is the court’s approach to disclosure in the fast and intermediate track?

A

Disclosure will take on place on the standard basis in line with the timetables in PD28 (fast) and CPR28 (intermediate)

36
Q

What is the court’s approach to disclosure in the multi track?

A

Most likely location to depart from standard disclosure.
Court can order:
- Dispensing with disclosure
- Specific disclosure
- Issue-by-Issue
- Any other order the court deems appropriate

37
Q

What is specific disclosure?

A

Specific documents or classes of documents are specifically requested in the court order.

38
Q

When is a document in the party’s control?

A
  • If it was or is in the possession of the party;
  • The party had or has the right to inspect the documents;
  • The party has or had the right to inspect or take a copy of the document.

Even if a party is no longer in physical possession of a document, it will still need to be disclosed alongside a detailed explination of how it was lost !!

39
Q

What is a privileged document?

A

Even if the other party is aware of its existence through disclosure, they are prevented from inspecting or seeing it.

40
Q

What are the three types of privilege?

A
  1. Legal Advice
  2. Litigation
  3. Without prejudice
41
Q

What is Legal Advice privilege?

A

Confidential information between a legal representative and their client.

NOT third parties.

Widely applied, litigation does not have to have commenced or been contemplated.

The dominant purpose of the communication must be seeking and receiving legal advice.

General advice about litigation is not privileged, but specific advice about merits of a claim would be.

42
Q

What is Litigation privilege?

A

Confidential communication between a legal rep and client AND third party.

Narrow that legal advice as the sole or dominant purpose of obtaining the information must be in connection with the litigation itself which must have commenced or been reasonably contemplated at the time the document was created.

43
Q

What is Without Prejudice privilege?

A

Documents that are usually written in the court of negotiations to settle with another party.

Making an offer in the course of litigation that it does not want to be seen by the court.

If it is a genuine offer then it is likely to be WP.

44
Q

Can a party waive their privilege?

A

Yes

Allows the party to see the document in question.

Cannot wait a part of a document - it will be the whole thing. Cannot Cherry Pick.

45
Q
A