6. Decision Making (2) Flashcards

1
Q

What factors may impact on decision-making ability?

A
  • Escalation of commitment
  • Availability/unavailability bias
  • Confirmation bias
  • Optimism bias

These biases are perpetuated in group situations –> groupthink, conformity, diffusion of responsibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How can we overcome biases in groups?

A

Through setting up systems and team processes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is ‘conformity’?

A

Tendency to conform to the group due to pressure and distortion of the way we perceive information.

In ambiguous situations, when we are unable to determine the appropriate mode of behaviour, we assume the actions of others reflect correct behaviour for a given situation (i.e. social proof and descriptive norms)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define ‘groupthink’

A

Group members try to minimise conflict and reach a consensus decision without critical evaluation of alternative viewpoints

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are symptoms of ‘groupthink’?

A

→ Overestimation of the group: illusion of invulnerability; unquestioned belief in the group

→ Close-mindedness: rationalising warnings that challenge group decisions; stereotyping those who oppose the group

→ Pressures towards uniformity: self-censorship; illusions of unanimity; direct pressure; mindguards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How do hierarchies and silos impact on decision-making in organisations?

A
  1. Information is filtered as it moves up through hierarchies – sensitive or embarrassing information is withheld or glossed over. And those at the top inevitably receive incomplete and distorted data
  2. Organisational silos not only disperse information: they also disperse responsibility. In some cases, everyone assumes that someone else is taking responsibility, and so no one ever acts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is diffusion of responsibility?

A

Everyone is waiting for another person to do something first, e.g. lots of people walking past an unconscious person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Why must we be especially careful of biases in organisations?

A

Organisations help perpetuate individual and group biases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Within organisations, what may further enable biases?

A

Leadership style, e.g. Dr William Lucas of NASA → zero tolerance for dissent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What leadership traits risk perpetuating bias?

A
  • Diminishing Others’ Knowledge: Tendency to seek out opinion and facts that support own beliefs and hypothesis: This perpetuates CONFIRMATION bias.
  • Dismiss people with a different belief or opinion: „they are incompetent…“, “they don’t understand…”
  • Reward optimism and interpret pessimism as disloyalty
  • Don‘t really listen; waiting to counter-argue
  • Subtle signals that their mind is already made up
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How does the default, “winning” mindset influence decision-making?

A
  • Selective use of information (some information is suppressed, never heard)
  • Egos come into play
  • Assumption: Superior solution will emerge from test of strength
  • Resolved through battle of wills and behind-the-scenes manoeuvring
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How can leaders help overcome biases?

A

Leaders should be MULTIPLIERS:

The best leaders amplify the smarts and capabilities of the people around them
➢ ASK probing questions rather than offering all answers
➢ LISTEN: with purpose (not preparing counter-argument)
➢ Promote debate: split groups to fight for different cases
➢ Challenge the absence of disconfirming evidence
➢ Encourage dissenting views
➢ Beware! subtle signals, “no bad news approach” indicaties your mind is already made up

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Compare the advocacy (traditional) and inquiry (preferred) approaches to decision-making

A

ADVOCACY:
a contest, discussion involves persuasion and lobbying, participants as spokespeople, striving to persuade others and defend your opinion, dismissing/discouraging minority views, outcome is winners and losers

INQUIRY:
a collaborative approach to problem-solving, discussion is for testing and evaluating, participants as critical thinkers, balanced arguments, open to alternatives, accepting of constructive criticism, minority views cultivated and valued, outcome is collective ownership

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How can we model the process of decision-making?

A

With the “Three Cs” approach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the “Three Cs of decision-making”?

A
  1. Constructive conflict
    → Cognitive vs. Affective conflict
    → Establish norms: Avoid people reacting defensively – Language rules
    → Ask people to examine underlying assumptions
  2. Consideration
    → The people participating in the process must believe that they had a genuine opportunity to influence the decision (procedural justice perceptions)
    → Listen actively and show willingness to accept views that differ from their own
  3. Closure
    → Beware of deciding too early
    → Beware of deciding too late
    → Leverage collective thinking – does not necessarily mean absolute consensus
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How can an organisation help overcome biases in group decision-making?

A
  • Ask ourselves: What would have to be true for this option to be the right answer?
  • Retrospective pre-mortem
  • Contrarian hypothetical questions
  • Structuring the debate: Assigning one group to fight for a position and another to develop the alternative, etc. (Some companies hire a person to be the devil‘s advocate or assign a person to that role)
  • Assigning people to fight for a position different from their initial interests
  • Assigning people to adopt the perspective of a different function
  • Leaders: avoid showing initial preferences – or show them as subject to change. Giving real weight (and not “pretended” weight) to alternatives
  • Identify latent discontent; “Give ourselves time to develop disagreement”
  • Healthy debate: Questions being asked and type of listening
  • Keeping people involved in the process: most crucial element
17
Q

What are characteristics of a working group?

A
  • Strong, clearly focused leader
  • Individual accountability
  • Group purpose same as overall organisation’s
  • Individual work products
  • Efficient meetings
  • Measures effectiveness indirectly by influence on others, e.g. financial performance
  • Discusses, decides, delegates
18
Q

What are characteristics of a team?

A
  • Shared leadership roles
  • Individual and mutual accountability
  • Specific team purpose
  • Collective work products
  • Open-ended discussions and active problem-solving meetings encouraged
  • Performance measured directly, by collective work products
  • Discusses, decides and does real work together
19
Q

Can we blame biases for errors alone?

A

No, there are often complex causes: a combination of individual biases, group biases and systemic issues.

20
Q

What is the hindsight (outcome) bias?

A

People will retrospectively always want to attribute blame somewhere. e.g. “They should have done x… This was bound to happen…”

21
Q

How does the hindsight (outcome) bias impact on

groups that received good performance appraisals?

A

Claimed high cohesiveness and good communication.

22
Q

How does the hindsight (outcome) bias impact on

groups that received poor performance appraisals?

A

Claimed lack of cohesion, poor communication, and low motivation

23
Q

Why should we evaluate processes and not outcomes of performance?

A

The margin between success and failure is often very narrow. Post-hoc reconstruction minimises the role of chance as an explanation.

24
Q

What two “S’s should be done when group decision-making in organisations?

A
  1. SEEK information – challenge, encourage dissenting views, beware of subtle signals, don’t just reward optimism
  2. SHARE information – ask for unique views of others, create structures that make sharing default