6. Airway Assessment Flashcards

1
Q

How do you assess a patient’s airway prior to anaesthesia?

A

Remember:

History
Examination
Investigations
This is easy to forget in examination conditions.

History
Any history of previous problems with airway
management must be elicited and the anaesthetic
charts reviewed.

Exam
Anatomical

Mallampati

Forward mandibular movement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Anatomical problems

A

Obesity
Large breasts
Prominent teeth
Short, thick neck
Syndromes associated with difficult intubation
Trauma, local infection, radiotherapy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Mallampati score

A

This assesses the visibility of the pharyngeal structures
and assumes the view is related to the size of the tongue base.

The further assumption is that a large tongue base may
hinder exposure of the larynx.

Initially there were three proposed classes,
but Samsoon and Young added a fourth in 1987 and
this has gained common acceptance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Mallampati score

A

Technique – patient sitting, head neutral, mouth fully open and tongue
fully extended, no phonation. Some suggest conducting the test twice.

Class I
Exposure of soft palate, uvula and tonsillar pillars

Class II
Exposure of soft palate and base of uvula

Class III
Exposure of soft palate only

Class IV
No visualisation of pharyngeal structures except hard palate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Forward mandibular movement

A
  1. Cervical spine movement

Assesses atlanto-occipital and atlanto-axial joint mobility.

The patient is asked to extend the head with the neck in full flexion.

  1. Thyromental distance
  2. Sternomental distance
  3. Prayer sign
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q
  1. Thyromental distance
A

Described in 1983 by Patil et al. and
defined as the distance from the chin
to the notch of the thyroid cartilage
with the head fully extended.

If this is less than 6 cm,
it may be associated with difficult intubation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
  1. Sternomental distance
A

Described in 1994 by Savva and defined as the distance from the
tip of the chin to the sternal notch.

If this is less than 12 cm, it may be associated with difficult intubation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q
  1. Prayer sign
A

Difficult intubation has been associated with the inability to place both palms
flat together and seems to be more common in diabetics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Wilson risk score

A

Wilson risk score:

This gives a score from 0–2 for each of the following risk factors:

Weight

Head and neck movement

Jaw movement

Receding mandible

Buck teeth

A score of 3 or more predicts 75% of difficult intubations (with 12% incidence of false-positives).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Combined predictors

A

Individually, these tests have only moderate sensitivity and specificity. More
recently, investigators have looked at combined predictors to try and increase
the usefulness of these tests.

The combination of Mallampati class III/IV
with a thyromental distance of less than
7 cm is predictive of a grade IV

laryngoscopy with high sensitivity and specificity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Investigations

A

Plain X-rays of head and neck
CT scan
Fibre-optic laryngoscopy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Some useful terms

Difficult intubation

Difficult laryngoscopy

Difficult mask ventilation

Failed oxygenation

A

When placement of an endotracheal tube requires more than 3 attempts
and/or more than 10 min (ASA)

Laryngoscopy
As described by Cormack and Lehane

Difficult mask ventilation
Less clearly defined but certainly a different entity to the concepts above.
One study showed a 15% incidence of difficult mask ventilation in
patients who had difficult or failed intubation.

Failed oxygenation
SpO2 < 90% with FiO2 1.0 (DAS)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How would you manage a difficult airway?

A

A difficult airway may be recognised pre-operatively as described above

A difficult airway may be recognised pre-operatively as described above or
may be unrecognised, presenting itself when the patient is anaesthetised +/− paralysed.

These two situations warrant different management.

The basic principles common to both include:.

Maintain oxygenation

Call for experienced (in difficult airway) senior anaesthetic help

Call for experienced surgical help

Ensure difficult airway adjuncts are available

Have working knowledge of a difficult airway algorithm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Recognised difficult airway

A

With anticipated difficult airway management,
the airway should be secured with the patient awake.

Preparation in this case is essential.
Consideration should be given to the following:

  1. Psychological preparation of the patient
  2. Monitoring
  3. Drying agents
  4. Aspiration prophylaxis
  5. Sedation
  6. Oxygen supplementation
  7. Topical local anaesthesia +/− nerve blocks
  8. Topical vasoconstrictors
  9. Appropriate equipment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

If intubation fails in recognised difficult airway , options include:

A
  1. Cancellation of surgery
  2. Regional anaesthesia
    It must be recognised that this could result in the
    need for general anaesthesia and airway control
    in suboptimal conditions should the regional
    block fail.
  3. Surgical airway
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Unrecognised difficult airway

A

This scenario occurs when ‘Plan A’ for conventional intubation has failed
and presents a very different scenario.

Management depends on whether mask ventilation is possible or not
and whether the intubation was part of a rapid-sequence induction.

If mask ventilation is possible,
‘Plan B’ intubation techniques can be attempted.

Options include alternative rigid or fibre-optic laryngoscope blades,
blind oral or nasal techniques,
flexible fibre-optic laryngoscope,
retrograde intubation,
illuminating stylet,
rigid bronchoscope or
percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy.

‘Plan B’ is omitted during a rapid sequence induction.

17
Q

Plan C

A

‘Plan C’ involves maintenance of the airway and oxygenation and waking
the patient.

One or two person bag-valve-mask systems may be required as
may the use of oral or nasal airway adjuncts.

Failing oxygenation is an indication to attempt LMA insertion.

18
Q

‘Plan D’

A

is for ‘can’t intubate, can’t ventilate’ scenarios and involves
surgical cricothyroidotomy for emergency rescue oxygenation.

It must be noted that the LMA is a supraglottic device and may fail if an
obstruction lies at or below the glottic opening.