5th Amendment Flashcards

1
Q

Brady Rule Case Definition Essential components

A

Brady v. Maryland (1963)

Issue: Prosecutor’s failure, on request, to turn over evidence favorable to accused violates due process where evidence is material to either guilt or punishment.

Essential components:
1. Favorable to accused (exculpatory or impeachment)
2. Willful or inadvertent withholding
3. Prejudice (materially)
4. Material if it would undermine the validity of the verdict.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Jencks Act disclosure Relevant factors to consider

A
  1. No connection between prior statements and prior testimony need be established before disclosing prior statements
  2. Once defendant has requested, required to disclose if related to subject matter of testimony In camera to determine whether pertaining to testimony
  3. Can redact if not related If prosecution turns over, witness’s testimony is stricken or mistrail declared where appropriate.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Jencks - Categories of disclosure required

A
  1. Written statement made by witness or otherwise adopted and approved
  2. Substantially verbatim contemporaneously recorded recital of witness’s oral statement (including statements by police as interviewing witness)
  3. Statements to grand jury, however recorded, or transcription thereof
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Prosecution’s duty to preserve evidence Cases most frequently cited Relevant rules

A
  1. CA v. Trombetta (1984) - Evidence expected to play a material role
  2. Exculpatory value apparent before and after destruction
  3. Materiality - whether it under minds confidence in verdict
  4. Arizona v. Youngblood (1988) - In absence of bad faith, failure to preserve potentially useful evidence does not impact due process.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination 3 elements Type of protected statement

A

CUST
1. Compulsion by state
2. Use in criminal case
3. must be witness against himSelf
4. Testimonial in nature

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Exculpatory no doctrine What is it? Which landmark case abolished?

A
  1. Cannot perjure oneself by claiming you didn’t do it.
  2. Abolished in Brogan v. US (1988) -
  3. Now must remain silent to avoid perjury.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Types of immunity for giving testimony

A
  1. Transactional - no prosecution for any transaction discussed. Broadest form of immunity.
  2. Use/derivative use - no use of testimony but can still be prosecuted.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Waiver of Fifth Amendment privilege. When is it lost?

A
  1. Waiver must be explicit or implicit by giving testimony inconsistent with retention.
  2. Can lose privilege permanently if not invoked.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Miranda doctrine Elements considered for custody

Elements for interrogation

A

PAPICA
1. Purpose of investigation
2. Awarness of freedom to leave
3. Place and length
4. Initiated how and by whom
4. Coercive tactics used
5. Atmosphere

Interrogation - done with purpose of eliciting incriminating response, “express questioning or its functional equivalent,” coercion and susceptibility thereto.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Exceptions to Miranda requirement:

A
  1. Booking
  2. Public safety
  3. Testimony before grand jury
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly