5B Flashcards

1
Q

Why is correlation not the same as causation?

A

Correlation does not establish causality because of possible omitted variables, spurious relationships, or reverse causation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a panel study?

A

A longitudinal study where multiple cases (e.g., people, countries) are followed over time, collecting repeated observations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is an example of a panel study?

A

The LISS-panel in the Netherlands surveys the same 15,000 respondents every year to track changes in political attitudes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are within-case effects in panel studies?

A

Examining changes within the same individuals over time, rather than comparing different individuals at a single time point.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why are within-case effects useful?

A
  1. They bring us closer to causality by reducing omitted variable bias.
  2. They provide more data points, especially for cross-country research where the number of countries is limited.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is omitted variable bias?

A

When an unmeasured factor influences both X and Y, creating a spurious relationship.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Why do within-person effects reduce omitted variable bias?

A

Since individuals serve as their own control, time-invariant factors (e.g., genetics, upbringing) cannot cause bias in within-person comparisons.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is an example of a within-person effect in political science?

A

A person’s trust in politics decreases in the years when they vote for a populist party, suggesting a relationship between political trust and populist voting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the problem of reversed causality?

A

In cross-sectional studies, we cannot tell if X causes Y or if Y causes X.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How do panel studies with lagged effects address reversed causality?

A

They examine whether X at an earlier time predicts Y at a later time, reducing the possibility that Y influences X instead.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is an example of a lagged effect?

A

If political trust in 2008 predicts populist voting in 2009, it suggests that trust influences voting rather than the other way around.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is an experiment?

A

A study where researchers manipulate an independent variable and randomly assign participants to treatment and control groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the two defining features of experiments?

A
  1. Manipulation – The researcher actively changes the independent variable.
  2. Randomization – Participants are assigned to groups by chance.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Why is randomization important in experiments?

A

It ensures that treatment and control groups are similar on all characteristics except the treatment, eliminating omitted variable bias and reverse causation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is an example of an experiment in political science?

A

An online survey experiment where respondents are randomly assigned to read different news articles before answering political attitude questions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is a limitation of experiments?

A

Some variables cannot be manipulated due to ethical or practical reasons (e.g., we cannot randomly introduce authoritarianism to study its effects).

17
Q

What is external validity, and why is it a problem in experiments?

A

External validity refers to how well the results apply to the real world. Many experiments occur in artificial settings, making them less generalizable.

18
Q

What is a natural experiment?

A

A situation where randomization occurs naturally, allowing researchers to study causal effects without direct manipulation.

19
Q

How can natural experiments help with policy evaluation?

A

They provide real-world causal evidence where full randomization is not possible, such as in legal or economic policy changes.

20
Q

What is an instrumental variable in natural experiments?

A

A variable (e.g., assigned judge) that indirectly influences the outcome (e.g., recidivism) only through its effect on the independent variable (e.g., type of sentence).

21
Q

What is a quasi-experiment?

A

A study that lacks full randomization but still resembles an experiment, often using pre-test and post-test comparisons.

22
Q

What are common features of quasi-experiments?

A
  1. A treatment and control group.
  2. A pre-test and post-test design.
  3. A manipulation, though not fully randomized.
23
Q

How are quasi-experiments different from full experiments?

A

They do not have completely random assignment, making them inferior to full experiments but stronger than observational studies for causal inference.

24
Q

Why are quasi-experiments important for public policy research?

A

Policy changes cannot be fully randomized, so quasi-experiments help evaluate their effectiveness in real-world settings.

25
Q

What is an example of a quasi-experiment?

A

A universal basic income program in an American Indigenous community allowed researchers to compare pre- and post-policy effects on child mental health and crime.

26
Q

What is an interrupted time series design?

A

A quasi-experimental method that examines changes before and after a policy intervention, comparing trends over time.

27
Q

How do the different research designs rank in terms of causal inference?

A
  1. Experiments (highest causal certainty).
  2. Natural experiments (strong, but dependent on real-world conditions).
  3. Quasi-experiments (good, but lack full randomization).
  4. Panel studies with lagged effects (better than cross-sectional but still limited).
  5. Cross-sectional studies (weakest in establishing causality).