55 - Treatment of Hallux Limitus Flashcards

1
Q

Overview of history

A
  • 1887 - First described by Davies-Colley
  • 1888 - Cotterill coined the term Hallux rigidus
  • Usually classified by pain with ROM of 1st MPJ and limitation of ROM of 1st MPJ
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

1st MPJ motion

A
  • Normal dorisflexion is 65-70 degrees
  • Only 25-30 degrees attainable without 1st ray plantarflexion
  • If you can’t plantarflex, it leads to jamming which leads to pathology of the joint (jamming, arthritis, bone spurs)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Etiology

A
  • Dorsiflexed 1st metatarsal
  • Trauma (MOST COMMON)
  • Pronation decreasing pull of peroneus longus
  • Long 1st met or short 2nd met
  • Generalized arthridities (i.e, gout, RA, etc.)
  • Iatrogenic (previous surgery leading to the 1st ray sticking up in the air)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

ACFAS Classification (2003)

A
  • Stage I: Stage of functional limitus
  • Stage II: Stage of joint adaptation
  • Stage III: Stage of established arthrosis
  • Stage IV: Stage of ankylosis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Stage I

A

Stage of functional limitus

  • Hallux equinus with plantar subluxation of proximal phalanx and metatarsus primus elevatus
  • Joint dorsiflexion may be within normal with NWB, but ground reactive forces elevate the first metatarsal and yield limitation
  • No degenerative joint changes noted radiographically
  • Hyperextension of the hallux IPJ
  • Pronatory architecture of foot is present
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Stage II

A

Stage of joint adaptation

  • Flattening of the first metatarsal head
  • Osteochondral defect/lesion
  • Cartilage fibrillation and erosion
  • Pain on END ROM, passive ROM may be limited
  • Small dorsal exostosis
  • Subchondral eburnation
  • Periarticular lipping of the proximal phalanx, the first metatarsal head and the individual sesamoids
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Stage III

A

Stage of established arthrosis

  • Severe flattening of the first metatarsal head
  • Osteophytosis, particularly dorsally
  • Asymmetric narrowing of the joint space
  • Degeneration of articular cartilage
  • Erosions and excoriations, crepitus (popping) of joint during ROM
  • Subchondral cysts
  • Pain throughout FULL ROM and associated inflammatory joint flares
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Stage IV

A

Stage of ankylosis
- Obliteration of joint space
- Exuberant osteophytosis with loose bodies within the joint space or capsule
-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Treatment recommendation for Stage I and II

A
  • Since there will be no or very little joint and cartilage damage, the idea is to save the joint as much as you can – NO joint destructive procedures are recommended here
  • Either clean up any burring that is occurring or treat any underlying etiology (pronation)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Treatment recommendation for Stage III and IV

A
  • Since the joint is pretty much shot at this point, the idea is to do a joint destructive procedure
  • Either some sort of arthrodesis or a joint implant is recommended – Age plays a factor
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Non-joint destructive procedures

A
Exostectomy
o	Cheilectomy (MOST COMMON) 

Proximal phalanx osteotmy
o Kessel bonney
o Regnauld

1st metatarsal osteotomy
o	Watermann, Watermann-Green
o	Youngswick
o	Dorsal V, Sagital Z
o	Lambrinudi

Arthrodiastasis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Cheilectomy (MOST COMMON)

A
  • Joint “clean up” procedure
  • Remove dorsal exostosis off the 1st met head (shave off bone to prevent jamming)
    o May need to remove excess bone off base of proximal phalanx as well
    o Can be primary procedure or used with all other procedures
  • Look at condition of cartilage
    o Used as primary procedure for early disease, prior to large amount of cartilage destruction – If done on patient with extensive cartilage defect, may increase pain
    o For small defect, use K wire do osteochondral drilling – Helps create fibrocartilage
  • This is not going to be your last procedure, it will just get you by until you need a more definitive procedure like an arthrodesis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Complications of Cheilectomy

A
  • Adhesions (scar tissue)
    o Early ROM is key to prevent this
    o Some suggest bone wax or electrocautery to prevent bleeding bone and adhesions
  • Recurrence
    o At some point, limitation of movement, exostosis, and joint destruction will likely progress
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Cartilage grafting or patching

A
  • Emerging treatment option
    o Cartilage graft or cartilage patch
    o These have cartilage cells, it needs to be rehydrated before insertion into the joint
    o Can take fresh-frozen talus bone, then being placed in the joint
  • Not done a lot because the simple arthrodesis is effective, not necessarily needed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Kessel Bonney

A
  • Older procedure, not done much anymore
  • Resection of a dorsally based wedge of bone from the base of the proximal phalanx
  • Plantarflexory motion is redirected
  • Will increase hyperextension deformity of hallux if already present
  • No degenerative changes present
  • Does not relax capsular structures address primary deformity
  • Effective for a stage 1 or stage 2 hallux limitus
  • Hallux will be sticking up in the air a little bit
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Regnauld

A
  • Also known as the “Mexican Hat” procedure
  • Shortening osteotomy of proximal phalanx
  • Creates a peg and hole effect
  • Technically difficult to perform and fixate
  • Thought to create more joint space by decompressing it
  • You take off a wedge of bone all the way around the bone – the thought behind this procedure is that if you have an excessively long phalanx, you are somewhat shortening the phalanx
  • Hard to say how effective it actually is because not a lot of people are doing this
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Watermann

A
  • Most of the procedures that are currently done focus on the metatarsal head, not the phalanx, such as this procedure
  • Dorsal wedge osteotomy out of 1st metatarsal head
  • Originally described as a trapezoidal piece of bone removed from met head
  • Works by reorienting the cartilage and decompressing the joint
  • Difficult to fixate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Complications of Watermann

A
  • May violate the sesamoids and cause pain and arthritis

- Lesser metatarsalgia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Watermann-Green

A
  • Piece of bone removed from dorsal half of met head and has a second
    cut that is angulated to protect sesamoids
  • Plantarflexes met head and decompresses the joint by shortening the metatarsal
  • More stable and easier to fixate than traditional Waterman osteotomy
  • PROTECTS SESAMOIDS
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Youngswick

A
  • MOST COMMON
  • Austin (chevron) osteotomy with two parallel cuts dorsally
  • Shortens metatarsal, plantarflexes metatarsal
  • Allows lateral transposition if needed
  • Stable and easy to fixate – don’t have to try to not
    violate the sesamoid apparatus, you can go in at a
    safer angle
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Dorsal V

A
  • Chevron cut made dorsal to plantar through metatarsal neck
  • Plantarflexes metatarsal head
  • Can be difficult to fixate and does not offer decompression
  • NOT taking a wedge of bone out, just making a cut from dorsal to plantar
    and sliding the metatarsal head down
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Sagittal Z

A
  • Sagittal Z through met shaft with proximal arm exiting medially and distal arm exiting laterally
  • Can be used to lengthen or shorten
  • If shortening, should take out equal amounts of bone from either arm
  • Also allows for plantarflexion, so have to be careful not to trough the bone
  • Not common
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Lambrinudi

A
-	Plantarflexory base osteotomy to correct 
metatarsus primus elevatus
-	Used for structural elevatus
-	Requires non-weightbearing
-	More difficult to perform
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Oblique sagittal base osteotomy

A
  • Goes through both cortises
  • Allows for plantarflexion and shortening if necessary
  • Can take out a wedge if IM needs to be corrected
  • Not as stable as other 2 base procedures
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Arthrodiastasis

A
  • Last non-joint destructive procedure we will talk about
  • Initially used in hip in Verona, Italy
  • Stretch periarticular soft-tissue structures in staged process, mini rail is used
  • Need to discuss this with your patients – might not be okay with external fixation
26
Q

Distraction protocol

A
  • Intra-operative distraction of up to 5mm
  • Joint left static for 5 to 7 days allowing adaptation
  • Distraction 0.5mm/day for a maximum of 14 days
  • Joint left static for 14 days for a total of total of 8 to 12 mm
  • Physical Therapy
27
Q

Joint destructive procedures

A
  • Arthroplasty (Keller, Hemi or total implant)

- Arthrodesis

28
Q

Keller resectional arthroplasty

A
  • Resection of the proximal 1/3 of the proximal phalanx
  • HAV – Remove medial eminence
  • Hallux limitus – Do cheilectomy as well
  • You will be losing flexor hallucis brevis***
  • Things will be out of balance, so you can potentially end up with a hammer toe on the hallux
  • Typically done for elderly patients who are not as active because you lose FHB and end up with a hammer toe
29
Q

Indications of Keller

A
  • Geriatric bunion (Retrograde buckling, Get up 5.5 degrees correction if not rigid)
  • Osteoporosis/Cystic changes
  • End stage hallux limitus/rigidus
  • Hallux Varus with unsalvageable joint
  • Neuropathy
30
Q

Neuropathy as an indication for a Keller

A

Neuropathy
o Bunion deformity in patient you don’t want to use hardware
o Ulcer under hallux IPJ due to hallux limitus (biomechanical etiology of ulcer)
o NEUROPATHY is usually the reason she ends up doing a Keller

31
Q

Contraindications of Keller

A
  • Salvageable first MPJ
  • Active individual (Especially athlete or dancer, You are losing the flexor hallucis brevis, so you will lose some of the push-off power and possibly altered gait)
  • Spastic neuromuscular disease (Need 1st MPJ stability)
32
Q

Complications of Keller

A
  • Floating toe/Flail hallux
  • Lesser metatarsalgia
  • Hallux malleus or cock up deformity
  • Lesser met stress fracture (due to the FHB be gone and the 1st metatarsal head being weaker – more pressure on the lesser metatarsals)
  • Retraction of sesamoids
  • Ankylosis of the joint
33
Q

Modifications to Keller

A
  • Reattaching the flexors
  • Leaving a plantar “shelf” where the flexors are still attached
  • Capsular interposition (flaps or purse-stringing)
  • May use K wire to stabilize the toe
34
Q

Keller and capsule interposition

A
  • The capsule is typically thin in elderly patients

- You might not have a lot of capsule available in order to do this

35
Q

Post-op course for Keller

A
  • WB in postop shoe 2-3 weeks

- Remove K wire if used after 2-4 weeks

36
Q

Advantages of Keller

A
  • Eliminates joint pain
  • Minimal postop disability
  • Early return to regular shoe gear
  • Relatively easy to perform with minimal dissection required
  • ***Can be performed in presence of 1st ray malalignment
37
Q

Disadvantages of Keller

A
  • Creates shortened hallux
  • Loss of 1st MPJ function and/or stability
  • Increased incidence of central metatarsalgia
  • Salvage procedures can be difficult due to loss of bone
38
Q

Now we are moving on to implants

A

FYI

39
Q

Criteria for implant arthroplasty

A
  • End stage hallux limitus or rigidus
  • Failed Keller arthroplasty
  • Adequate bone stock to accept implant stem, no active infection, no allergy to implant material
  • Normal alignment of 1st MPJ (NO BUNION CAN BE PRESENT) unless 2nd procedure planned realign metatarsal
40
Q

Types of implants

A

Hemi
o Base of proximal phalanx replaced

Total
o Base of proximal phalanx and 1st met head removed
o One component
o Two component

41
Q

Implant materials

A

Silicone
o Very popular in the 80’s, but found to break down over time

Metal
o Cobalt chromium – strong and corrosion resistant, but contains nickel
o Titanium – Integrates well with bone and light weight, but not as durable

42
Q

Implant types

A
  • 1st generation: Silicone – hemi and total
  • 2nd generation: Improved silicone – hemi and total with grommets
  • 3rd generation: Metallic – hemi and total that are press fit
  • 4th generation: Metallic – hemi and total with threaded stem
43
Q

Technique considerations

A

Sterilization and handling of implant
o Try to handle as minimally as possible
o Contamination is a concern
o Static charge (silicone) is a concern

Modification of implant
o Modifications can weaken implant – not recommended
o Can shorten stem if needed

44
Q

Technique considerations considered

A
  • Size of the implant (use smallest for best motion)
  • Pistoning of the implant
  • Necessary for silicon – disperses forces better and prolongs implant life
  • Try to avoid with metal implant – will cause bone resorption and loosening of implant
45
Q

Keller with implant

A
  • Remove base of proximal phalanx (about the same thickness as implant)
  • If for hallux limitus, do cheilectomy
  • Check size of implant
  • Drill or tamp hole in base of proximal phalanx for implant stem
  • Insert the implant
46
Q

1st metatarsal head resurfacing

A
  • Can be used for 1st or 2nd met head
  • One component system
  • 2 component system – stem and cap separate
47
Q

1st metatarsal head implant procedure

A
  • Insert guide pin perpendicular to surface
  • Insert taper post and decompress the joint
  • Map out the joint surface
  • Ream for inlay socket
  • Remove excess one
  • Tamp inlay in place
  • This way you have a nice smooth surface on the head of the metatarsal and you have not destroyed any tendons in the process (like you do when doing a phalanx procedure)
  • You do unfortunately get some bone loss with this, so if it does fail that can be a problem
48
Q

Total flexible hinge implant

A
  • Made of silicone
  • Has stems for proximal phalanx and 1st met with central hinge – can face hinge dorsally or plantarly
  • Acts as a dynamic spacer – get some motion but not as much as hemi or 2 component systems and stabilizes joint
49
Q

Grommets

A
  • Thin titanium shield that fits over stem

- Protects silicone from shearing forces and sharp bone edges

50
Q

Total implants – Two component systems

A
  • Replaces base of proximal phalanx and 1st met head
  • Allows for greater postop range of motion than 1 component system
  • Difficult to salvage if failure because you are taking out a lot of bon on either side of the joint, so if it fails you will need to do an arthrodesis with bone graft to regain some of that length
51
Q

Post-op course with implants

A
  • Postop shoe until skin heals (usually 2 weeks)
  • Early range of motion for hemi and 2 component systems (start at 1-2 weeks, needs to be passive)
  • May need continued compression for up to 4 weeks (Coban or Ace wrap)
52
Q

1st MPJ arthrodesis

A
  • Joint DESTRUCTIVE procedure
  • End stage procedure
  • Generally better procedure for younger or highly active patients compared to arthroplasty
  • Fixated with 2 crossing screws or locking plate
53
Q

Contraindications of 1st MPJ arthrodesis

A
  • IPJ arthritis
  • Patient with severe osteoporosis
  • Patient whose job requires a lot of squatting (i.e. – roofer)
  • Best option for a young, healthy, active person
54
Q

Diagram of arthrodesis

A
  • Transverse and sagittal plane views of hallux fusion position temporarily fixated with a k wire
  • Dorsal/transverse plane view shows temporary wire fixation across the first MPJ fusion site for primary arthrodesis – Note that the hallux is not touching the second toe
  • Sagittal plane view from medial shows temporary wire fixation across the fusion site
  • Note that the hallux is elevated 5-10 mm from the supporting surface – this is due to the thickness of the hallux sesamoids
55
Q

Post-op care

A
  • Cheilectomy, Keller, Implants = WB in postop shoe until sutures out, then regular shoegear to tolerance
  • Distal 1st met osteotomies = WB in postop shoe 4-6 weeks, then supportive shoegear
  • Proximal 1st met osteotomies = NWB 6-8 weeks,
  • 1st MPJ fusion = WB in removable fracture walker for 6-8 weeks

***In non-destructive procedures, EARLY ROM is key to successful outcome, usually started as soon as skin incision healed enough to allow motion

56
Q

STUDY – Hallux limitus outcomes

A
  • A multicenter retrospective review of outcomes for arthrodesis, hemi-metallic joint, and resectional arthroplasty in the surgical treatment of end-stage hallux rigidus
  • Kim PJ, Hatch D, DiDomenico LA, Lee MS, Kaczander B, Count G, Kravette M, Level 3 study
  • Purpose: Multicenter, retrospective, comparative study examining the long-term outcomes of arthrodesis, hemi-metallic joint implants, and resectional arthroplasty in patients with end-stage hallux rigidus
57
Q

Methods for study

A

Inclusion criteria

  • Minimum 1 year follow up
  • Had arthrodesis, hemi-implant arthroplasty, or resectional arthroplasty
  • Stage 3 or 4 hallux rigidus (Coughlin and Shurnas Classification)

Exclusion criteria - seronegative or seropositive arthropathy

58
Q

Measurement for study

A
First meatarsophalangeal joint and first ray scoring scale (ACFAS)
o	Pain (30 points)
o	Functional capacity (15 points)
o	Appearance (5 points)
Modified Hallux Metarsophalangeal-Interphangeal scale (AOFAS)
o	Pain (40 points)
o	Function (40 points)
o	Alignment/cosmesis (20 points)
59
Q

Results of study

A

General
o BMI was selected to be lower –may be why implant did almost as good as arthrodesis

Complications with arthrodesis
o Metatarsalgia was most common
o Non-union and malalignment were next most common
o Revision, IPJ pain and delayed union were less common

Complications with implant
o Bony overgrowth to joint was most common
o Radiolucency around implant, migration of implant and dorsal drift of hallux were next
o Metatarsalgia, cystic changes, first ray elevation, subsidence of implant, sub-first metatarsal pain and revision were less common

60
Q

Limitations to study

A

o Had no preop scores to compare to postop since it was retrospective
o Surgical technique not standard
o May have procedure bias

61
Q

“You can look through the case study on your own”

A
  • HPI: 46 year old male, right 1st MPJ pain for past 2 years, likes to run but pain has been preventing it
  • PMH: kidney stones, chronic back pain, PSH: right 2nd hammertoe repair
  • Meds: advil, subtuex, Lexapro
  • SHx: denies tobacco, alcohol or drug use
  • ROS: denies arthridities, psoriasis, tingling, numbness
  • PE
    o NVSI
    o 10 degrees total ROM
    o Pain at end ROM
    o No crepitus
    o Pain with palpation of dorsal boney prominence
  • Assessment
    o Hallux limitus