5.1.3 + 5.1.4 Flashcards
1. Schizophrenia and one other disorder from anorexia nervosa, Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and unipolar depression 2. For schizophrenia and the other disorder, students should be familiar with two treatments for each disorder: one from biological and one from psychological
3 features of schizophrenia:
- Around 1% of the population will develop schizophrenia, depending on their racial/ethnic background, which country they live in and country of birth
- around 25% fully recover, 50% suffer reoccurring episodes for the duration of their lifetime and 25% never recover
- The average life expectancy for someone with SZ is around 10 years less than average. This may be because of physical health problems associated with the disorder or the higher suicide rate
3 symptoms of schizophrenia:
- people with schizophrenia may experience positive symptoms such as delusions which are beliefs held by the individual that are not true or logical, and can’t be changed by others even when clear evidence can be demonstrated that challenges that belief eg paranoid delusions where the individual believes others are trying to mislead, manipulate or even kill them
- They may also have hallucinations where they hear or see something without any stimulus being present e.g. controlling voices telling the person what to do
- Another symptom is disorganized thinking/speech where ideas are loosely connected or in severe cases completely unconnected and their language is completely incomprehensible as they are unable to connect thoughts – word salad
Describe one biological explanation for schizophrenia – 6
Genes
- The genes for schizophrenia are inherited and the disorder tends to run in families.
- The presence of certain types of genetic mutations may be needed before environmental factors contributed a disorder, suggested by the diathesis-stress model.
- Such environmental factors can affect body mechanisms that are driven by genes e.g. stress and hormones
- The risk of developing schizophrenia at some point in your life is around 0.2-2% for the general population. However if you have a second-degree relative with schizophrenia, the risk increases to 2 to 6%. If your relative is first degree then your risk of schizophrenia increases even more to 6 to 17%
- Gottesman and Shields (1966) showed that there is a strong genetic element by finding that people who had an MZ twin with schizophrenia had a 42% chance of developing the disorder, where as DZ twins had a 9% concordance rate. It is also possible that it is genetics that may cause excess production of or sensitivity to dopamine
Evaluation of Genes as a biological explanation for SZ:
4 strengths
- Tienari et al (2000) found that almost 7% of adoptees with SZ had a biological mother with the same disorder, compared to only 2% of SZ children born to mothers without SZ. Therefore there must be a genetic basis for SZ as those whose mothers also had the disorder had a higher rate of 7% of developing SZ and those who shared genetic with mothers without SZ had a lower rate of developing SZ.
- Studies have shown high levels of heritability eg Tiwari et al showed a meta-analysis of twin studies found 81% heritability and Lichtenstein found 64%. Therefore these high figures suggest that genes are the largest explanation for SZ due to the high rates of developing SZ that exists between a group of individuals with shared genetics.
- Family and twin studies eg Gottesman give support for a genetic component as showed 42% concordance rates between MZ twins and 9% concordance rates with DZ twins. Therefore genetics must have a role in the development of SZ as those who share 100% genetics are around 4 to 5 times more likely to develop SZ if the other twin has SZ compared to twins who only share 50% of their genetics.
- A study by Heston controlled for environmental effect and still found a higher incidence of SZ in those with a family history of the disorder (AO1). Therefore… (AO3)
Evaluation of Genes as a biological explanation for SZ:
4 weaknesses
- Sorri et al (2004) conducted a longitudinal study of 21 years on Finnish adoptees. Comparing adoptees with and without biological mothers with SZ while considering family rearing styles and found that those with high genetic risk are more sensitive to non-healthy rearing patterns. Therefore the environmental factors are important too in the development of SZ and it is not just down to biological influences.
- It has been shown that other factors such as social and environmental influences are involved and seem to trigger SZ eg as those in urban areas or low social economic status seem to have a higher risk in developing SZ. Therefore the biological explanation is incomplete as perhaps stressful life events can trigger production or as suggested by the diathesis stress model it is a combination of the genes with the environment that explains SZ.
- As most MZ twins share their environment, both genes and environment are similar, making it hard to determine what’s responsible. MZ twins are also raised more similarly than DZ twins. Therefore MZ twins share a more similar environment which could account for the higher concordance rate with MZ twins compared to DZ twins, rather than the genetic factors.
- Because concordance rates are at around 40-50% and not 100% for MZ twins then it suggests that other factors such as the environment also play a role (AO1). Therefore… (AO3)
Describe another biological explanation for schizophrenia - 6
Function of NT
- One explanation is the function of neurotransmitters; the dopamine hypothesis. Research suggests that the presence of an excess number of dopamine receptors at the synapse contributes to schizophrenia
- This overactivity of dopamine controlled synapses is associated with hallucinations and paranoia
- It is possible that an increase in dopamine in one side of the brain, the mesolimbic pathway, contributes to positive symptoms and that problems in another site, the pathway connecting the midbrain to the frontal lobes, to negative symptoms.
- Sensitivity to dopamine can arise in many ways e.g. from genetic inheritance to brain damage, so there are many ways to develop schizophrenia
- It was seen that patients who had abused large amounts of drug amphetamine often showed positive symptoms of psychosis
- the finding that changing dopamine levels resulted in psychotic type behaviour consistent with that shown with SZ sparked the beginning of the dopamine hypothesis
Evaluation of NT as a biological explanation for SZ
4 strengths
- Drugs to increase dopamine production in suffers from Parkinson’s disease give psychotic symptoms. For example, people given levodopa, which adds to dopamine production for Parkinson’s disease can experienced similar symptoms to schizophrenia such as hallucinations and delusions. Therefore suggesting that the dopamine hypothesis is a strong explanation for schizophrenia as excess dopamine is involved in type one symptoms
- Randrup and Munkvad (1966) raised dopamine levels in the brains of rats by injecting them with amphetamines. Results showed a change to the rats behaviour through stereotypical schizophrenia behaviour such as aggression and isolation. Therefore the finding that increase dopamine levels resulted in psychotic type behaviour consistent in those with schizophrenia sparked the Dopamine hypothesis as an explanation for schizophrenia
- SZ’s are more sensitive to dopamine uptake; scanning shows that if those with SZ are given amphetamines there is a greater release of dopamine than if non SZ are given amphetamines. Therefore this suggests those with SZ are more sensitive to dopamine than other people which makes the dopamine a strong explanation for SZ as it affects these individual more.
- Many traditional antipsychotic medications used to treat SZ act by reducing the effect of dopamine by blocking dopamine receptors (AO1) . Therefore…(AO3)
Evaluation of NT as a biological explanation for SZ:
4 weaknesses
- It has been shown that blocking dopamine receptors takes a few days to work. Anti-schizophrenic drugs block the dopamine receptors almost immediately but any calming effect is not notice for several days or even weeks. Therefore this suggests that the idea of excess dopamine explaining schizophrenia is not the only explanation as something else is causing the psychotic symptoms
- Animals are used to investigate dopamine pathways and the effects of drugs on them eg lesioning is used with animals to explore the effects of dopamine on their functioning. Therefore although results may show schizophrenia type symptoms, it cannot be generalized to humans as a biological explanation as there are many differences in the biology of human brains and the functioning of our nervous systems
- Evidence has only been gathered from patients after they has diagnoses so its unclear whether the brain was the same before diagnosis. Therefore a cause and effect relationship cannot be established as you don’t know whether the increased levels of sensitivity to dopamine are the cause of SZ or if developing the illness changes brain chemistry
- Carlsson et al (2000) suggests that it is unlikely that dopamine is the only dysfunctional neurotransmitter in SZ. It is thought that other NT eg noradrenaline, serotonin, glutamate and GABA also relate to SZ (AO1). Therefore the explanation of raised levels of dopamine is likely to be to simplistic…(AO3)
Describe non-biological explanation for schizophrenia - 6
Social Causation/Adversity Hypothesis
- There is evidence that people in the lowest social classes and groups such as immigrants have a higher incidence of SZ than others in the UK
- In the UK a higher incidence of SZ has been found in bot the lowest social class of the white population and in the black immigrant groups
- It seems that social class and environment may either be a cause or at least be involved in its development as suggested by the diathesis-stress model
- Studies regularly show that SZ is found more among the unemployed and those living in deprived city areas. SZ is more associated with cities than rural communities so it may be that something in city life leads to SZ
- Other features in the environment that might affect the development of SZ seem to be adversity in adult life, poverty, social isolation, poor housing and overcrowding, high levels of crime and drug use, and separation from parents as a child.
Evaluation of social causation hypothesis as a non-bio explanation for SZ:
4 strengths
- Pedersen and Mortensen (2001) found that there is a correlation between the risk of schizophrenia and urban density and that longer length of exposure to highly populated areas increase the risk compared to that in a rural environment. Therefore this suggests that an explanation for schizophrenia is social causation due to a link between stresses in our environment e.g. growing up in busy urban areas, and a risk of developing schizophrenia
- Veling et al. (2008) showed that in the Hague there was more schizophrenics living in a place where their ethnic group was not predominant compared with the places where their ethnic group did predominate. Therefore this suggests that an explanation for schizophrenia may be due to a social cause as living in an area where your ethnic group doesn’t predominate could be very stressful e.g. if you’re experiencing racism or discrimination
- Mortensen et al (1999) found a two-fold increase of risk of developing SZ for those born in the capital compared with those born in a rural region of Denmark. Therefore this suggests that twice as many people are at risk of developing SZ if they are born in urban areas compared to rural. This means that there is a social causation factor at play if the environment someone is born in is having such an influence on the risk of SZ development.
- Tiwari et al (2010) found factors that relate to SZ such as growing up in an urban environment, cannabis use, male gender, stress and malnutrition (AO1). Therefore there are environmental factors… (AO3)
Evaluation of social causation hypothesis as a non-bio explanation for SZ:
4 weaknesses
- The social drift hypothesis suggests that those with schizophrenia drift into the lower social classes and into adversity because of the disorder, such as not being able to work and also through symptoms of the disorder e.g. difficulty with personal care. Therefore it is difficult to explain schizophrenia as being due to social causation as it’s hard to separate environmental factors to see if they cause or are the result of schizophrenia
- Cooper (2005) found that a tendency to schizophrenia seems to come from what happens to someone in childhood and the early stages of their lives, rather than developing because of lower socioeconomic status and related issues. Therefore the link between schizophrenia and lower socioeconomic status may not be an explanation of schizophrenia but rather that it may come from children living in these circumstances as much as the social status of an adult
- Living in crowded urban areas can lead to toxins in the environment eg from petrol and other factors eg not having social support in communities leading to isolation and communication difficulties. Therefore there are social factors that help explain SZ but it is difficult to know which social factors are involved as it is very difficult to isolate any confounding variables to establish a single cause.
- White people in the lowest socioeconomic groups do not show the increased risk of SZ that black immigrants do (AO1). Therefore this suggests that there is more than just a social cause eg social adversity and lower social class, which is impacting the risk of developing SZ… (AO3)
Describe a biological approach as a treatment for SZ - 6
Drug Treatment
- Drug therapy started in the 1950s; up until then treatment for psychotic patients were basic and did not allow patients to function normally.
- If neurotransmitter functioning causes symptoms, drug treatments that affect such functioning can help to treat those symptoms. Eg Chlorpromazine (Typical - 1952), which acts by blocking dopamine receptors so that there is no excess dopamine.
- They want to suppress hallucinations and delusions. Atypical drugs are newer from the 1990s and less widely used eg risperidone.
- They tend to have fewer side effects and act in different ways to typical antipsychotic drugs
- Drugs can reduce the positive symptoms in about 2 weeks, although typical antipsychotics seem not to work on negative symptoms or cognitive symptoms
- Atypical drugs seem to be better for negative symptoms and for improving cognitive function
Evaluation of Drug therapy as a treatment for SZ
linked strengths and weaknesses
1) Haloperidol 2) Clozapine 3) Drugs 4) Ethics
- Meltzer et al (2004) found that Haloperidol gave significant improvements in all aspects of functioning compared with the placebo group. Two of the new drugs also showed improvements in both positive and negative symptoms. Therefore it is an effective treatment for schizophrenia has it improved symptoms and functioning for those on drug treatment, allowing them to live in society and be less of a risk to themselves or others
- However Haloperidol is an example of a typical antipsychotic which can be associated with disturbances of movement and posture such as tremors and muscle spasms. Long term use of these typical drugs can lead to TD which can be irreversible. Therefore these severe side effects may be enough to discourage schizophrenics to not take their drug treatment shown by around 50% of SZ’s stopping their drugs due to forgetting or side effects. This then puts them at risk of relapse or re-hospitalisation
- Brar et al (1997) found that Clozapine highly effective in treating positive symptoms of hallucinations and other psychotic symptoms including negative ones eg emotional withdrawal. Therefore this means that people who had not previously responded to other drugs found newer Atypical drug treatment that were effective in treating both positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia which allows these schizophrenics to fit into society and eg avoid institutionalisation which would have been previously unavoidable.
- However clozapine has also been found to increase the risk of patients developing agranulocytosis which reduces the white blood count and increases the risk of infections. Therefore patients must have blood tests every two weeks to monitor their blood count which can be a commitment that disrupts the schizophrenic from being able to try and be independent while also having strong negative health risks
- Emsley (2008) found that those who had the injection of the antipsychotic drug early in the course of their disorder had higher remission rates and lower relapse rates. They found that drug treatment is effective at treating schizophrenia in 84% of patients. Therefore there was at least a 50% reduction in symptoms which improves the quality of lives for many SZ as they can function independently and avoid long term hospital stays.
- However drugs do not take into account a patients environmental or social problems which might contribute to rehospitalisation and relapses. Therefore drug treatment is more effective when used with therapy which is able to address these issues eg stressors in their life such as struggling financially as alone drug therapy is not a cure for patients with SZ.
- Drugs are thought to be better than former pre 1950s treatments eg insulin shock therapy, as they are seen as more ethical and more effective (AO1). Therefore…(AO3)
- Ethically drugs have been called a ‘chemical strait-jacket’ and some people think such control by society is unacceptable (AO1). Therefore…(AO3)
Describe a non-biological approach as a treatment for SZ - 6
Assertive Community Treatment - ACT
- ACT is used to help patients who have frequent relapses and bouts of hospitalisation to be focused on from the community health service.
- They can help patients with independence, rehabilitation and recovery and to avoid homelessness and hospitalisation.
- ACT offers a holistic treatment that looks at all of their needs in a multidisciplinary approach through eg counselling, halfway houses or day centres.
- Treatment of the patient is in a real life settings as they are visited and helped, rather than offering therapies, with enough staff to offer this support and related treatment
- Teams are made up of lots of professionals, such as psychiatrists, nurses, social workers and people with whom the treatment has worked so that a whole team can focus on the individual.
Evaluation on ACT as a treatment for SZ
strengths and weaknesses are linked
1) Leff 2) team/staff 3+4) more general ACT eval.
- Leff (1997) found that schizophrenics in long term sheltered accommodation had less severe symptoms than those still in hospital. Therefore ACT is effective at treating schizophrenia as patients given a range of services with the aim of rehabilitation allowed them to function as normally as possible in society and improve their quality of life so that they can recover better in comparison to those in the hospital environment
- However Leff (1994) found the balance between hospital and community services was inappropriate as there weren’t enough hospital beds for those that needed them and not enough residential places for those released from hospital. Therefore it is not an effective treatments if community care programmes are underfunded as it can be unethical, impacting the patients recovery and even make them worse
- Van Vugt et al (2012) in the Netherlands found that ACT could be effective and that it was the team structure that was important. Therefore ACT is an effective treatment for schizophrenia if there is a whole team of professionals eg psychiatrists, nurses and social workers who can all focus on the individuals so that they avoid relapses and re-hospitalisation
- However ACT works best in heavily populated areas where there is a high incidence of people with schizophrenia needing care in the community. Otherwise it can be difficult to bring in these teams of professionals as there are not enough cases to warrant it. Therefore in less densely populated areas it may not be provided because of the cost implications making it less effective as a treatment as it can’t always be accessed.
- Bond (2002) found that ACT was extremely effective in most mental disorders across gender, age and culture and suggested it allows the client to have choices. Therefore this is an effective treatment for many people with SZ as they can have improved quality of life and avoid hospitalisation despite patient factors eg age, race and religion.
- Although therapies such as ACT help to prevent relapses they do not seem to have an effect on actual functional as they do not reduce positive or negative symptoms of schizophrenia or help with employment prospects. Therefore they are not effective as a treatment by itself as it needs to be used alongside antipsychotic drugs to actually be an affective treatment for schizophrenia
- It is thought to be good for those who have many relapses, because it might be problems with living outside the hospital that lead to such episodes eg works by helping the individual to function in society (AO1). Therefore… (AO3)
- Gomory (2001) found that ACT is paternalistic and coercive as the patient does not have the choice of whether to undergo the treatment ie there is social control. It is suggested that around 11% of patients feel forced into the treatment (AO1). Therefore…(AO3)