5.1 HOW SIGNIFICANT WERE REVOLUTIONARY IDEALS IN THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY? Flashcards

1
Q

What is meant by ‘revolutionary ideals’?

- (The Rev ideals leading to overthrow of James II) -

A

Beliefs, ideologies, that are new. Challenging existing ideas.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is meant by ‘constitutional monarchy?

- (The Rev ideals leading to overthrow of James II) -

A

Where the monarch rules according to Parliament’s rules

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a Parliamentary monarchy?

- (The Rev ideals leading to overthrow of James II) -

A

Where the gov is answerable to an elected P. P helps to determine national policies and their implementation. P has leg and financial pwr and controls the gov by having Pary overside of gov’s actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was Locke’s view on the dangers on enforcing religious uniformity?
- (The Rev ideals leading to overthrow of James II) -

A

Many whig MPs shared Locke’s view, that enforcing religious uniformity would lead to social disorder, impossible to enforce a single ‘true religion’

However only a small minority would’ve agreed with these views and used them as a justification for removing james.
- James wasn’t nec intent on enforcing religion uniformity. But rather for more toleration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is passive obedience?

- (The Rev ideals leading to overthrow of James II) -

A

Unquestioning obedience to the authority of the monarch, even when the monarch abuses his or her powers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Which group of churchmen tended to follow Passive obedience? also the view that one should not commit
- (The Rev ideals leading to overthrow of James II) -

A

Most Anglican Church leaders believed in PO

However there was also the view that one should not commit an immoral act, even if the king ordered it.
For example, the need to resist popery was also v. strong. = Rationalise resistance / revolution as necessary to ensure a Protestant succession

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What action did James take in 1688 which clearly caused religious tension that ‘apparently’ led to GR
What did opponents say and why?
- (The Rev ideals leading to overthrow of James II) -

A
  • 1688 Dec of indulgence reissued.
  • Obvious reason - religious: C included
  • Political: James attempting to overrule parliament. Wreaked of absolutism. (susp of Act of Uniformity)
  • For james, the dec of ind, granting toe, was a eans to get political support from dissenters

= religious and political tension. ( out into context Godden vs Hales cases in 1686 + re modelling Borough Charters to ensure his supporters would be elected as MPs, and appointing Catholics as magistrates. Set up Ecclesiastical Commissions to act as a court for church affairs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did Marquis of Halifax and Gilbert Burnet argue about James’ actions and the response that should follow?
- (The Rev ideals leading to overthrow of James II) -

A

Marquis of Halifax=Dissenters should resist james overtures (Promises lol) to them and wait for P to pass a law granting them greater toleration, which did not include C, which did not mean absolute rule

Gilbert Burnet (clergyman) Wrote ‘III effects of Animosities among Protestants in England detected’ = early Williamite propaganda.
Burnet’s key points
1- CII and JII attempted to create divisions among Protestants so they could promote C and arbitrary gov
2- (so both conformists and non conformists should work together to defend established church)
3- James in 16587, had virtually deposed himself from gov by transgressing the constitution and the laws of England.
4- James was an Absolutist cunt as we can see by his fucking absolutist actions wink dec of ind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Why was James’ Voluntary resignation of his throne essential for a revolution to occur?
- (The Rev ideals leading to overthrow of James II) -

A

1- It allowed the Rev to happen. The commons may have supported a vote against James, but Lords Probs Would not have, nor many clergy. Many in the Political est were in favour of divine right and hereditary monarchy order to prevent a return to unstable gov *flashback of republican rule**
SOOOO basically Commons wouldve had democracy if they wanted jams out but the Lords are PUSSIO and the Clergy are the Sheep

  • The majority of ppl in Eng would not have dared to challenge the rule of James. Most genrty and aristocracy took james policies and actions with resignation.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What other factor, NOT connected to James’ religious and political actions, was also essential for revolution to occur.
- (The Rev ideals leading to overthrow of James II) -

A
  • Williams willingness to carry out an invasion was essential in enabling the rev to take place, Those who invited him did not have a clear plan of what should happen next.
  • William had been planning an invasion of Eng BEFORE his invitation (lol it was handed to him in a gold plate)
    -The fact that William even before JII left London gave order that Dutch ships display Eng flags when attacking French ships = clearly intended to force rupture bet eng and France + his aim was to get Eng support for his war
    William is the GOAAT
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

After William arrived the term of the political settlement were not absolutely clear so William arranged for a meeting with sympathetic who?

A

Peers and MPs on the 6th December 1688.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Dec of rights was presented to them and read out at Mary and William….

A

Carnation

= W&M Placed on the thrones based on terms put forward by elected rep of the people.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The Declaration OF RIGHTSwas modified and became the..

A

Bill of Rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was included in the Bill of Rights 1689?

A

Addressed many of the abuses of royal prerogative under Charles II and James II

  • Regular and free elections
  • Clarified the legal position of the army, there was to be no standing army
  • A force could not be kept during times of peace without the consent of Parliament
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the significance of the Mutiny Act, 1689

A
  • Gave the monarchs powers to discipline members of the army.
    -lasted for only one year at a time = ensured Parliament had to be called regularly
    HOWEVER,
    it did not guarantee the regular sitting of P
    if the monarch did not did not need to discipline the army, there would be no need to recall P to update the act.
    Mutiny Act did contribute to the frequent calling of P, but due to William being at war majority of his reign.
    but still Triennial act need to for a more formal mechanism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How did the Bill of Rights Revolutionary/Limit monarchy’s power?

A
  • Far greater parliamentary control over the army (helped by the Mutiny Acts)
  • Legally changed the order of succession by offering the crown to william and mary = against hereditary right = parliament decides
  • Cleared up grey areas of royal prerogative
  • Crown could no longer tamper with elections as it had before
  • Concept of the “consent of parliament”
  • Set into law for the first time free speech and free elections
  • Dispel the idea of divine right once and for all
  • Gave the authority for the later Triennial Act
  • There were to be no Ecclesiastical Commissions, limited the monarch’s ability to interfere in judicial procedure
17
Q

How did monarchy remain unlimited by the Bill of Rights / not revolutionary

A
  • P had no control over appointments to the army
  • Claim that james had ‘voluntarily’ given up the throne was a compromise bet loyalist and radicals.
    Did not stat how an Arbitrary (absolutist) monarch should be removed = limited
  • Some aspects seen as vague by Christopher Hill, e.g. what are ‘free’ elections? How frequent should P be, and how was this to be enforced? ( needed triennial act in 1694 to make it clearer)- absolutism could continue
  • John Morrill - not as significant as some historians suggest. It was statute law so could be revoked by P at any point. Did not form a contract bet the monarch and the people (reference to Locke). Monarch still free to decide on foreign policy, choose own advisors
  • Only in England and Wales not Scotland
18
Q

What was the Act of Settlement 1701?

A

In an attempt to bypass potential Catholic heirs to the throne it vested succession in the House of Hanover, it also barred Catholics or those married to Catholics from ascending the throne.

  • Passed without the Scots consent, English dominated agenda
  • Provided by a mixed, balanced government by King, Lords and Commons with no one party being pre-eminent
19
Q

How was monarchy limited by the Act of Settlement?

A
  • Judges could no longer be dismissed without the consent of parliamentary, less royal manipulation of justice
  • Taxation by royal prerogative was now impossible
  • No foreign monarch could enter into war to defend their homeland without parliamentary consent
  • No foreign born man could join the Privy Council or sit in Parliament
  • Royal pardon irrelevant in impeachment cases
20
Q

How did monarchy remain unlimited after the Act of Settlement?

A
  • Many of the clauses were reactionary to William’s policies
  • In the interest of existing ruling Anglican elites
  • Officially parliament was still an advisory body and the office of prime minister didn’t arrive until later
21
Q

was the revolution settlement (bill of rights and act of settlement) the end of divine right
brief

A

was certainly severely damaged

technically no longer possible to state monarchs power was derived from god - as authority was granted by parliament

22
Q

was the revolution settlement (bill of rights and act of settlement) the end of divine right
historical view points - whigs

A

whigs = return to stability rather than new dawn
some saw it as starting point for new constitution
some saw it as beginning of parliamentary sovereignty

23
Q

was the revolution settlement (bill of rights and act of settlement) the end of divine right
historical view points - marxist historians (hill

A

major turning point

benefactors were landed classes rather than people at large

24
Q

was the revolution settlement (bill of rights and act of settlement) the end of divine right
historical view points - revisionist

A

morrill - events changed little apart from the line of succession
although div right destroyed, no constitutional monarchy established
parliament still a mere adviser
PM did not emerge till 1721
parliament still only represented richest 2%