(5) Torts: Defamation Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Definition:

Libel

A

Defamation by words written, printed or otherwise recorded in permanent form.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Common Law Damages Rule:

Libel

A

Damages are presumed there is no obligation to prove concrete harm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Modern Trend Damages Rule

Libel

A

P needs to prove general damages which are damages that compensate the P for harm to their reputation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Libel per Quod:

Libel

A

In certain jurisdictions if the defamatory statement requires extrinsic proof to show it is defamatory then P must prove either special damages or that the statement fits into one of the 4 categories of statements that satisfy the requirements of slander per se.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Definition:

Slander

A

Defamation by spoken word, gesture or any form other than libel.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Damages Rule:

Slander

A

To recover for Slander the P must prove (a) Special damages or (b) Slander per se.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Special Damages

Slander - Damages

A

Require P to prove a (1) 3rd party heard the defamatory comments; AND (2) acted adversely towards P. (usually an economic loss but could also include fiancé breaking off engagement or friend refusing to host them in home).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Slander per Se

Slander - Damages

A

The defamatory statement must fit within one of the following 4 categories (a) Having a loathsome disease; (b) Committing a crime of moral turpitude or that subjects P to imprisonment; (c) Disparaging statement regarding P’s lack of fitness to conduct business or profession; or (d) Lack of chastity for a woman.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Private Defamation

A

P must prove that D (1) Published (to a 3rd party who understands its defamatory nature) a; (2) Defamatory statement of fact; (3) Of and concerning P that; (4) Damaged P’s reputation (+ causation)
*(1) Published means D communicated it to someone other than P either intentionally or negligently
*(2) Language that harms a person’s reputation or deters others from associating. An opinion is actionable if the D implies there is a factual basis for that opinion.
*(3) A deceased person cannot be defamed
*(4) Subjected P to hatred, contempt, ridicule or $ injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Republication

Private Defamation

A

A person who repeats a defamatory statement may be liable for defamation even though that person identifies the originator of the statement and expresses a lack of knowledge as to the truthfulness of the statement.
*Internet service providers are not publishers for the purpose of defamation law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Public Defamation - Public Official

A

A government employee who has or appears to have substantial responsibility for or control over the conduct of government affairs. Candidates are also treated as public officials.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Public Defamation - Public Figure

A

P is a public figure if they have a position that influences society and are deemed public figures for all purposes OR P thrust themselves to the forefront of a particular public controversy in order to influence the resolution of the issue. In this situation the P is a public figure if the defamatory statement relates to their participation in the controversy otherwise they are a private figure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Public Defamation - Private Person/Private Matter

A

No constitutional restrictions on defamation law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Public Defamation - Private Person/Public Concern

A

If the statement involves a matter of public concern, then D is entitled to limited constitutional protections. P must prove D acted with fault either negligence or actual malice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Rule & how to prove one of the elements

Public Defamation - Public Figure/Official

A

P must prove with clear and convincing evidence (1) Falsity (that the defamatory statement is false AND (2) Fault (that the D acted with actual malice – they either had knowledge that the statement was false or acted with reckless disregard as to the truth or falsity of the statement).

To establish reckless disregard for truthfulness the P must prove that the D entertained serious doubts about its truthfulness, mere failure to check facts is not sufficient.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Defenses to Defamation

A
  1. Consent
  2. Truth of Statement
  3. Absolute Privilege
  4. Qualified Privilege
17
Q

Consent

Defenses

A

Consent by P, but D cannot extend beyond the scope of P’s consent.

18
Q

Truth of Statement

Defenses

A

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. A truthful statement is not defamatory. (Exam Tip: It could be IIED or Invasion of privacy)

19
Q

Absolute Privilege

Defenses

A

Based on the identification of the speaker these statements are qualified (a) in the course of a judicial proceeding by any participants (i.e., judge, lawyer, witnesses – must be related to proceedings); (b) in the course of legislative proceedings (a legislator may say anything no limitation); (c) between husband and wife; (d) required publications by newspaper, TV, or radio by a political candidate.

20
Q

Qualified Privilege

Defenses

A

Statements made under the following circumstances are subject to conditional privilege: (a) in the interest of the D, such as defending their reputation; (b) in the interest of the third party receiving the statement; or (c) affecting an important public interest.

21
Q

How is the defense of Qualified Privilege lost?

Defense

A

Qualified privilege is lost if made with actual malice (modern trend – knowledge that the statement is false or acting with reckless disregard as to the truth or falsity of the statement) (common law malice – express malice or hatred, ill will, spite).

22
Q

Who has the burden of proving Qualified privilege?

Defense

A

The burden is on the D to prove the privilege exists. Then the burden is on the P to prove the privilege has been abused.