5) Rights in Land Flashcards
ways to dictate how land is to be used (kinds)
1) covenant
2) equitable servitude
3) implied reciprocal servitude
ways to make affirmative use of the land (kinds)
1) easement
2) profit
3) license
covenant vs equitable servitude
covenant –> damage
equitable servitude –> injunction
implied reciprocal servitude: def
owner sells lots w restrictions that benefit the land he retained, then owner can’t violate same restriction. Becomes mutual, benefits both parties
covenants: elements: mnemonic
PINT
covenants: elements: list
1) Privity
2) Intent that covenant run w the land
3) Notice
4) Touch + Concern the land
(but start analysis w T+C)
touch + concern the land: def
must have both: dominant estate (benefitted parcel): must increase the use + enjoyment of the dominant estate
servient estate (burdened parcel): restriction must reduce the use + enjoyment of the servient estate
affirmative restriction: def
affirmatively requires burdened estate to do something (ex. maintain the fense)
negative restriction: def
requires burdened estate to NOT do something (can’t build anyting other than an SFD)
intent: def
writing must include language that shows the parties intent for the covenant to run w the land (to bind future owners)
*majority: if T+C, then I is presumed
notice: def
required ONLY for servient estate – current owners of servient estate must have taken w notice of the restriction
notice: kinds (for any property q)
1) actual
2) constructive
3) inquiry
actual notice: def
what you actually know
constructive notice: def
recordation
inquiry notice: def
you learn enough info that would lead a RP to inquire further, but you failed to do so
privity: def
need BOTH:
horizontal +
vertical
horizontal privity: def
privity of k taht exists btwn original covenantor + covenantee
must be in connection w the land, such as:
LL/T
grantor/grantee
mortgagor/mortgagee
(just 2 owners making a k about their land wouldn’t count!)
vertical privity: def
privity of estate. Rship btwn orig party to running covenant + successor in interest
for servient estate, ONLY exists where servient estate owner transfers ALL interest to the new owner! So a life estate or term of years doesn’t count (on dominant side can be just some)
equitable servitude: elements
1) T+C
2) intent
3) Notice
NOT privity!
SOF + ways to dictate use of land
SOF applies to:
covenants
equitable servitudes
but does not apply to:
implied reciprocal servitudes
implied reciprocal servitude: easiest way to create
CC&Rs: covenants, conditions, + restrictions: filed declaration
implied resciprocal servitude: elements
1) wrting NOT required
2) only works for negative restrictions (not affirmative)
3) restriction must be part of COMMON SCHEME OR PLAN for dvt of area +
4) current owner must TAKE WITH some sort of NOTICE (3 kinds ) of the restriction
common scheme: factors
1) large % of lots are expressly burdened
2) oral representations to buyers
3) statements in ads to buyers
4) recorded plat maps or other decs
implied reciprocal servitude: who can enforce?
1) original grantor
2) any purchaser affected by the common scheme
3) condo or subdivision association, for common land conveyed to it
how to terminate covenant or equitable servitude
1) written release (must be from benefitting party)
2) merger
3) abandonment
4) estoppel
5) changed circs so reason behind restriction is no longer valid (works for restrictions only)
merger: def
dominant + servient estates come under common ownership
abandonment: def
owner abandons enforcement + something more that shows intent to abandon (words or conduct)
estoppel: def
servient estate led to believe wouldn’t be enforced + detrimentally relies
who can enforce covenant/equitable servitude?
property owners assns!
easements: analysis
1) properly created?
2) scope?
3) termianted?
servient estate: def
estate burdened by the easement
dominant estate: def
estate benefitted by the easement (don’t have to have one!)
easement appurtenant: def
benefits a parcel of land, has a dominant estate
estaement in gross: def
easement that benefits a person or entity rather than a piece of land – so there is no dominant estate