5 - Product Portfolio Flashcards
product portfolio management strategy
companies should maintain comprehensive market coverage w/ minimal overlap
- balance coverage = to minimize cannibalization
product mix breath vs product line depth
breadth: variety + n of product lines offered by a firm (product categories)
depth: n of items in a product line (satisfying different sub-segments w/ different needs)
why manage product portfolios?
- efficient allocation of resources
- identity underperforming products + gaps
outcomes of managing the product portfolio
understand:
- visualization (how offering covers the market)
- financial contribution (ex: revenue, market share…)
- strategic roles (of the product)
change:
- line pruning (discontinue + revitalize underperforming products: increase efficiency + avoid cannibalization)
- line extensions (cover gaps - increase coverage)
financial contribution of brands
BCG growth matrix - for prioritizing brands by the degree of profitability (x: market share, y: category growth)
- cash cow (minimal investment + high return)
BCG ideal cash movement
excess cash from cash flows is invested in “?” so they become stars -> stars become cash cows when growth slows down
- pets should be analyzed to increase information value
strategic brand roles
focus brand: strong results + consumer following
support brands:
- fighter brand (low value offering)
- niche (narrow segment)
- past champion (cash cows)
- silver bullet (aspirational - birkin)
- entry point (affordable)
4 categories of brand extension
- line extensions (portfolio depth)
- category extensions (portfolio breadth)
- customer extensions
- channel extensions
line extension
transfer the existing brand name to a new product in the same line
- ex: new flavors, sizes, formats…
horizontal: same quality level but for different tastes
vertical: downmarket + upmarket
category extension
transfer the existing brand name to a new product outside the product category
- more risk
customer extension
using existing brand on new products for different segments (ex: dove women -> men)
channel extension
expand to different distribution channels
Levi’s Case
no one perceived Levi’s as a brand that sells suits
- did not fit into brand’s “non-conformity”
- market research must inform decision
- inside view is often biased (internal bias)
- brand associations often limit brand extensions
impact of portfolio on individual products
high priced products (set price anchor)
asymmetric dominance (decoy effect)
compromise effect (middle b/w 2 extensions)
leveraging a brand into new offerings: where to expand?
- consider brand associations
- identify product categories
- evaluate attractiveness of categories
- determine positioning