5 - Policy Formulation Flashcards
What is policy formulation?
Policy formulation refers to the process of generating options on what to do about a publicly recognized problem
What are some key characteristics of policy formulation, according to Jones (1984)?
- There might be multiple groups of actors involved
- The problem might lack a clear definition nor are affected groups necessarily involved in the formulation
- The process is never neutral, there are always winners and losers
What are the four phases of policy formulation?
- policy appraisal which concerns how evidence on policy alternatives is identified and collected by various actors
- dialogue where policy actors discuss the preferred solution
- policy formulation where public officials draft policy proposals
- consolidation where formulators legitimise their choices and try to win converts from the ranks of the disaffected
What are the two types of constraints encountered in policy formulation?
- Substantive constraints, related to the ease of solution of a problem
- Procedural constraints, i.e. institutional limitations
What are the possible scenarios in problem-centred policy design?
- Optimal policy-making: equal level of political and technical concerns/feasibility
- Populist policy-making: high political concern, little technical concern on applicable solutions (e.g. fighting crime)
- Technocratic policy-making: high technical concern, little concern about the political feasibility (e.g. raising taxes to deal with the homeless)
- Contested/ineffective low policy-making: neither political nor technical concerns
What is the NATO model?
It is a framework to classify policy tools according to:
1. Nodality: information-based
2. Authority: legal powers
3. Treasure: financial resources
4. Organisation: available formal organisations
What are some nodality-based policy tools?
- Public information campaigns
- Exhortation
- Benchmarking and performance indicators
- Commissions and inquiries
- Nudging
What are some authority-based policy tools?
- Regulation
- Delegated or self-regulation
- Advisory Committees
What are the limits of nodality-based tools?
- Information campaigns: they help but do not autonomously induce policy change, for which other conditions must be present
- Benchmarks: subject to gaming and evasion
- Commissions: may introduce uncertainties into policy formulation and their outcome is shaped by the personal preference of the members
Pros and cons of regulations
Pros:
- Low information needed
- Highest effectiveness in contrasting activity entirely undesirable (e.g. paedophilia)
- Their predictability makes them useful in times of crisis.
- Low-cost
Cons:
- Distort the market and can promote economic inefficiencies
- Do not consider individual circumstances
Treasure-based policy tools
- Financial incentives (e.g. grants, tax incentives, loans)
- Financial disincentives (e.g. tax, user charge)
- Funding for Advocacy, Interest Groups, and Think Tanks
Pros and cons of financial incentives
Pros:
- Easy to establish
- Flexible (actors spend the money autonomously)
- Prioritising certain issues, may promote innovation
- Politically friendly, since benefits are concentrated and costs shared among all the population
Cons:
- Expensive
- Costly to assess (i.e. not appropriate during crises)
- Market distortion
- Not feasible due to international agreements (e.g. WTO)
Pros and cons of financial disincentives
Pros:
- Easy to establish
- Promote innovation by motivating a search for cheaper alternatives
- Flexible (i.e. the government decides their amount)
- No bureaucratic enforcement machinery
Cons:
- Precise and accurate information
- During experimentation, resources might be misallocated
- Not appropriate during crises
- Might encourage evasive behaviour
Organisation-based policy tools
- Direct provision
- Public enterprises
- Partnerships
- Family, Community and Voluntary Organisations
- Market creation
- Government (re)organisations
Pros and cons of direct provision
Pros:
- Low information requirement
- The large size of public agencies involved allows for effective solutions
Cons:
- Bureaucratic slowness
- Shaped by political trends rather than the needs of the population
- No competition, thus economic inefficiency
- Inter- and intra-agencies political conflict may harm the measure effectiveness