5. Involuntary Manslaughter Flashcards
When is it relevant to consider involuntary manslaughter?
If D has caused the death of a human being but the prosecution cannot prove the mens rea for murder (intention to cause GBH / murder)
Two types of involuntary manslaughter
- Unlawful Act Manslaughter
- Gross Negligence Manslaughter
Unlawful Act Manslaughter: AR and MR
Apply the AR and MR of the unlawful act
- the crime must have an MR of intention or recklessness
- must be an act not omission
What crimes cannot form the basis for unlawful act manslaughter
- Strict liability crimes (because, no MR)
- negligence (because this can be an omission)
- s 18: wounding or grievous bodily harm with intent - as this will satisfy the MR for murder
Proving Unlawful Act Manslaughter: what more needs to be shown besides AR and MR
- That the act was dangerous
- objective assessment of risk to someone
- jury will assume knowledge D had or should have had at the time of the offence - Caused Death
- causation
Gross Negligence Manslaughter: What must be established
- D owed the victim a duty of care
- D breached that duty (act or omission)
- whether D fell below standard of reasonable person - Risk of death?
- obvious and serious (objectuve) - Did the breach ‘cause’ the death of the victim?
- Was D’s conduct ‘grossly’ negligent
- bad enough to deserve criminal punishment
Unlawful Act Manslaughter: What does it mean for the act to be ‘dangerous’?
The act must be one that ‘all sober and reasonable people would inevitably recognise must subject the other person to at least the risk of some harm…albeit not serious harm’.
Unlawful act manslaughter: is the test for ‘dangerousness’ objective or subjective?
Objective (reasonable person would view it as dangerous)