(5) Evidence: Hearsay Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Definition & Rule:

Hearsay

A

Out of court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted.

Hearsay statements are inadmissible unless they fall within an exception.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Is evidence generated by machines or animals Hearsay?

A

NO, the maker of the statement (declarant) must be a person. Evidence generated by machines or animals are not hearsay.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a “statement”, for Hearsay purposes?

A

A statement is a persons oral or written assertion or nonverbal conduct intended to be an assertion. An assertion is an act that is intended to communicate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Multiple Hearsay

A

A statement that contains hearsay within hearsay may be admissible as long as each part of the combined statement conforms to a hearsay exception.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the Hearsay Exceptions?

A
  1. Excited Utterance / Spontaneous Statement (CA)
  2. Present Sense Impression / Contemporaneous Statement (CA)
  3. Business Record
  4. State of Mind
  5. Statement of Medical Diagnosis or Treatment
  6. Past Recollection Recorded
  7. Government/Public Record
  8. Catch-All Exception (FRE only)
  9. Absence of Business Record or Public Record (MBE)
  10. Learned Treatise (MBE)
  11. Ancient Document (MBE)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Excited Utterance (FRE)/Spontaneous Statement (CA)

Hearsay Exceptions

A

An excited utterance is an exception to hearsay. An excited utterance is a statement (1) relating to a startling event or condition; (2) made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement that the event/condition caused. There can be a slight delay between the event and statement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

FRE vs CA rule:

Present Sense Impression (FRE)/ Contemporaneous Statement (CA)

Hearsay Exceptions

A

A present sense impression is an exception to the hearsay rule.

FRE Rule: A statement describing or explaining an event or condition that is made while or immediately after the declarant perceived.

CA Rule: Only applies when the statement is (1) offered to explain, qualify or make understandable conduct of the declarant; AND (2) was made while the declarant was engaged in such conduct. [Note: cant be made after the conduct occurred.]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Rule & CA Differences:

Business Record

Hearsay Exceptions

A

Business records are an exception to the hearsay rule and admissible if (1) a record of events, condition, opinions, or diagnoses; (2) kept in the regular course of business; (3) made at or near the time of the matter described; (4) made by a person with knowledge of the matter; (5) is the regular practice of the business to make such a record; AND (6) the opponent party does not show that the record was made under circumstances indicating a lack of trustworthiness.

In CA the business record exception does not include records of opinions or diagnosis only applies to records of events or conditions.

Additionally, the party introducing the business record has the burden of showing that the record was made under circumstances indicating trustworthiness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Is the author of the business record the only acceptable witness?

Hearsay Exceptions - Business Records

A

NO, the witness who lays the foundation for the business record does not need to be the author of the record and does not need to attest to its accuracy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

General Rule:

State of Mind

Hearsay Exceptions

A

A statement of the declarants present intent, motive or plan, can be used to prove conduct in conformity with that state of mind.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

State of Mind - Conditions Rule

Hearsay Exceptions

A

A statement of the declarants bodily health, pain or mental feeling at that time can be used to prove the existence of that condition but not its cause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Statement of Mind - Memory/Belief Rule

Hearsay Exceptions

A

Statements of memory or belief to prove a fact remembered or believed is NOT admissible unless it relates to the validity or terms of a declarants will.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

FRE vs CA rules:

Statement for Medical Diagnosis or Treatment

Hearsay Exceptions

A

A statement is not hearsay when (1) made for a reasonably pertinent medial diagnosis or treatment; AND (2) describes medical history or symptoms.

In CA statements concerning a persons past physical state are admissible only if they were made to medical personnel for the diagnosis or treatment of child-abuse/neglect victim less than 12 years of age.

AKA: statements must be relevant to medical diagnosis or treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Rule & Admitting the record:

Past Recollection Recorded

Hearsay Exceptions

A

A past recollection recorded is an exception to hearsay and admissible if: (1) the record is on a matter the witness once had personal knowledge of; (2) the writing was made or adopted by the witness; (3) the writing was made while the events were still fresh in the mind of the witness; (4) the writing accurately reflects the witness’s knowledge; AND (5) the witness no longer remembers the event.

if admitted the record may be read into evidence unless the record is offered by an adverse party then it may only be received as an exhibit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Rule & Exception (to the exception):

Government/Public Record (FRE)

Hearsay Exceptions

A

The following records are admissible of a public office or agency that set out (1) the activities of the office or agency; (2) observations of someone in accordance with their duties by law (except for police reports in criminal cases); or (3) factual findings of a legal investigations when offered in a civil case or against the government in a criminal case.

Exception: If the opposing party can show the record was made under circumstances indicating a lack of trustworthiness the record will not be admitted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Government/Public Records (CA)

Hearsay Exceptions

A

Government or public records are admissible as long as the writing was (1) made by and within the scope of duty of a public employee; (2) made at or near the time of the act, condition or event; AND (3) the record was made under circumstances indicating trustworthiness.

This exception applies to civil and criminal cases though there may be confrontation clause issues in criminal cases.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Rule:

Catch-All Exception (FRE Only)

Hearsay Exceptions

A

A hearsay statement is not excluded when the statement (1) has equivalent circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness; (2) is offered as evidence of a material fact; (3) is more probative on the point for which it is offered than any other evidence that the proponent can obtain through reasonable efforts; AND (4) admitting it will best serve the interests of justice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Catch All Exception (FRE only) - Requirements to admit

Hearsay Exceptions

A

The party must give the adverse party reasonable notice of their intent to offer the statement and its particulars including the declarants name and address so the adverse party has a fair opportunity to oppose its introduction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Absence of Business Record or Public Record

Hearsay Exceptions

A

Look for facts to indicate there was not a record.

20
Q

Learned Treatise

Hearsay Exceptions

A

Admissible when an expert witness is relying on the treatise during direct examination.

21
Q

Ancient Document

Hearsay Exceptions

A

A document more than 20 years old that has been authenticated.

22
Q

Hearsay Exceptions w/Unavailability Requirement

Hearsay Exceptions

A
  1. Dying Declaration
  2. Statement Against Interest
  3. Former Testimony
  4. Statement of Personal or Family History
  5. Statement Offered against a Party that Wrongfully caused the Declarants Unavailability
23
Q

Rule (with CA Differences):

Declarant Unavailability Requirement

Hearsay Exceptions w/Unavailability Requirement

A

An unavailable declarant is a person who (a) is exempt on the grounds of privilege ; (b)refuses to testify despite a court order to do so [In CA this does not apply unless the declarant refuses to testify out of fear or persistently refuses despite having been found in contempt of court]; (c) lacks memory of the subject matter of the statement [In CA total memory loss is required]; (d) is unable to testify due to death or physical or mental disability; OR (e) is absent and cannot be subpoenaed.

24
Q

If a declarant is unavailable due to the actions of either party does this satisfy the decalrant unavailability requirement?

Hearsay Exceptions w/Unavailability Requirement

A

NO, A declarant is not deemed unavailable if their unavailability is caused by either party.

25
Q

Rule w/ CA Differences:

Dying Declaration

Hearsay Exceptions w/Unavailability Requirement

A

FRE: A dying declaration is admissible if (1) the declarant is unavailable; (2) the statement was made when the declarant believed their death to be imminent; AND (3) the statement pertained to the cause of circumstances of the declarants imminent death.

CA: A dying declaration is admissible if (1) the declarant is dead; (2) the statement was made when the declarant believed their death to be imminent; AND (3) the statement pertained to what killed them.

26
Q

FRE & CA

In what type of proceedings is a Dying Declaration allowed?

Hearsay Exceptions w/Unavailability Requirement

A

This only applies to civil cases and criminal homicide cases.

In CA it applies to criminal homicide cases ONLY.

27
Q

Rule + CA differences

Statement Against Interest

Hearsay Exceptions w/Unavailability Requirement

A

A statement against interest is an exception to hearsay and admissible if (1) the declarant is unavailable; (2) the statement is against the declarants criminal, property or civil interests at the time the statement was made [In CA a statement against ones societal interests are also admissible]; AND (3) a reasonable person in the declarants position would only made the statement if they believed it to be true.

28
Q

Under FRE can a Statement Against Interest be brought in a Criminal Case?

Hearsay Exceptions w/Unavailability Requirement

A

Under the FRE: For a statement against interest to be offered in a criminal case it must be supported by corroborating circumstances that clearly indicate its trustworthiness.

29
Q

Definition & Rule w/CA Differences:

Former Testimony

Hearsay Exceptions w/Unavailability Requirement

A

Definition: a prior statement made under oath.

Statements are admissible if: (1) the statements are offered against a party who was present in the previous trial (can occur during the same trial); (2) the same issues are involved; AND (3) the party who it is offered against had the same motive and opportunity to cross examine the witness in the previous trial. [In CA the parties do not have to be in privity just share similar interests]

30
Q

Statement of Personal or Family History

Hearsay Exceptions w/Unavailability Requirement

A

A statement concerning an unavailable declarants own birth, adoption, marriage, divorce, legitimacy, familial relationship or other similar fact of personal or family history is an exception to hearsay and admissible.

31
Q

Rule & Who it applies to:

Statement Offered against a Party that Wrongfully caused the Decalrants Unavailability

Hearsay Exceptions w/Unavailability Requirement

A

A statement offered against a party that wrongfully caused the declarants unavailability is not excluded as hearsay. The wrongful party forfeits the right to object to the admission of the declarants statement as hearsay. The wrongdoing does not need to be criminal but must be a deliberate act with the intent of preventing the declarant from testifying.

*This exception applies to all parties including the government.
32
Q

Types:

Non-Hearsay

A
  1. Declarant Witness’s Prior Statements
    a. Prior Inconsistent Statements
    b. Prior Consistent Statements
    c. Prior Statement of Identification (An exception in CA)
  2. Statements/Admissions by Party Opponent (All are exceptions in CA)
    a. Vicarious Admissions
    b. Adoptive Admissions
    c. Judicial Admissions
  3. Statements Offered for Other Purpose
33
Q

Declarant Witness’s Prior Statements

Non-Hearsay - Declarant Witness’s Prior Statements

A

3 types of prior statements are not hearsay: prior inconsistent statements, prior consistent statements, and prior statement of identification. For these statements to be non-hearsay and admissible the witness who made the statement must (1) testify at the present trial or hearing and (2) be subject to cross examination concerning the statement.

34
Q

Prior Inconsistent Statement

Non-Hearsay - Declarant Witness’s Prior Statements

A

A prior inconsistent statement made under penalty of perjury may be admissible to impeach and as substantive evidence. If the statements were not made under a penalty of perjury then they are only admissible to impeach a witness.

35
Q

Define Penalty of Perjury

Non-Hearsay - Declarant Witness’s Prior Statements - Prior Inconsistent

A

Penalty of perjury = statement made under oath at a trial, hearing, proceeding, or deposition.

36
Q

Prior Consistent Statement

Non-Hearsay - Declarant Witness’s Prior Statements

A

A prior consistent statement is admissible to rebut an express or implied assertion that the declarant fabricated the statement or has an improper motive to testify. The statement must have been made before the declarant had reason to fabricate or the improper influence or motive arose.

37
Q

FRE vs CA Rule:

Prior Statement of Identification

Non-Hearsay - Declarant Witness’s Prior Statements

A

The prior statement of identification is not hearsay if the (1) declarant testifies; AND (2) is subject to cross examination.

In CA: This falls under an exception since statements previously made by a witness are exceptions to hearsay if: (1) the statement identifies someone who participated in a crime or other occurrence; (2) the statement was made at the time the crime or occurrence was fresh in the witness’s mind; AND (3) before the evidence of the statement is offered the witness testifies that he made the identification and it was a true reflection of their opinion at that time.

38
Q

Overview

Statements/Admissions by Party Opponent

Non-Hearsay - Statements/Admissions by Party Opponent

A

A statement/admission by a party opponent is not hearsay and is admissible. (In CA considered an exception) This includes vicarious, adoptive and judicial admissions.

39
Q

Rule w/CA Differences:

Vicarious Admissions

Non-Hearsay - Statements/Admissions by Party Opponent

A

Vicarious admissions are those made by (a) an authorized spokesperson – a person who is authorized by a party to make a statement on the subject; (b) a principal, agent or employee if the statement concerned a matter within the scope of and during the course of the relationship; OR (c) co-conspirators – a statement made during and in furtherance of a conspiracy but not after arrest.

*In CA there is no (b) but a statement made by an employee is admissible if the employee’s negligent conduct is the basis for the employer’s liability.
40
Q

Adoptive Admissions

Non-Hearsay - Statements/Admissions by Party Opponent

A

A persons silence may constitute an adopted admission if (1) the person heard and understood the statement; (2) the person had the ability and opportunity to deny the statement; AND (3) a reasonable person in a similar situation would have denied the statement.

41
Q

Rule & Exception:

Judicial Admissions

Non-Hearsay - Statements/Admissions by Party Opponent

A

An admission made during the discovery process or otherwise made during a proceeding is admissible conclusive evidence unless amendment. These statements may be rebutted.

Exception: a withdrawn guilty plea is not admissible in a subsequent civil or criminal proceeding.

42
Q

Statements Offered for Other Purpose

Non-Hearsay

A

An out of court statement offered to prove something other than the truth of the matter is non-hearsay and is admissible. Common non-hearsay statements include (a) verbal acts of independent legal significance (i.e., if a contract was formed); (b) statements offered to show the effect on the listener; (c) a prior inconsistent statement used to impeach or rehabilitate a witness; (d) circumstantial evidence of the speakers state of mind or to link a person with an event or object; AND (e) statements offered to prove the statement was made regardless of its truth.

43
Q

Overall Rule

6th Amendment Right to Confrontation

A

The confrontation clause provides criminal defendants the right to confront witnesses against them.

An out of court statement even if it falls within a hearsay exception violates a defendants 6th Amendment right when (1) the statement is “testimonial”; (2) the declarant is unavailable to be cross examined at trial; AND (3) the defendant did not have an opportunity to cross examine the declarant before trial.

44
Q

Testimonial Statements

Confrontation Clause

A

Testimonial statements are not admissible.

Courts have held the following statements to be testimonial in nature: (a) statements made to grand juries; (b) an affidavit or certified report containing forensic laboratory results; AND (c) statements made to the police whose primary purpose (when viewed objectively) is to collect testimony to be used at a later trial.

45
Q

Non-Testimonial Statements

Confrontation Clause

A

Statements made to the police where the primary purpose of the questioning was to assist the police in an ongoing emergency are not considered testimonial.

46
Q

How to determine if a statement is Testimonial

Confrontation Clause

A

Look at the primary purpose of the conversation and whether there is some intent to preserve for trial what is being said. If there is, then it is testimonial.

47
Q

If the primary purpose is to gather evidence, is that testimonial?

Confrontation Clause

A

YES