4.Intragenerational equity in climate policy Flashcards

1
Q
    • Results of Stern Review
    • WBGU Budget Approach, historical and future responsibilities
  1. – ETS
    • In case of horizontal MB , show how p can reach social optimal
    • International issues in Compliance and Enforcement
    • Process of Credit-based mechanism
    • Show Germany’s target (that they’re ambitious), Germany’s climate action plan
    • Flexibility of EU ETS, free allocation: how to calculate, carbon leakage: how do EU improve it
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Issues with ET?

A
  • Combined with individual reduction targets Kyoto ET can also be viewed as a system of side-payments.
  • Countries with lower interest in the treaty can be “bribed in” through the accordance of laxer targets and receive rents from selling certificates.
  • Side-payment Mechanism less visible to the voter than direct transfers.
  • But: Concessions to some countries were too large in 2012 in order to ensure a large coalition!
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the kyoto mechanisms?

A

Flexible mechanisms in the kyoto protocol

• Bubble Building (e.g. EU)
• Kyoto Emissions Trading
- between Annex I-Countries
• Joint Implementation
- Reduction projects between Annex I- countries
• Clean Development Mechanism
- Reduction projects in Developing Countries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Condition for a coalition to be success, with mathematical formulas if possible

A

–> The coalition is internally stable if no individual wishes to leave to join the fringe; it is externally stable if no fringe member wants to join the coalition.

  • Payoff of a member of coalition: πc (n)
  • Payoff of fringe: πf(n)

A coalition of size n is potentially internally stable if πc (n) >= πf (n-1)

A coalition of size n is potentially externally stable if πf (n) >= πc(n+1)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

State an individual’s firm optimization problem in an ETS

A
  • Assume that without regulation the firm emits e units
  • The firm is allocated q units of emission rights for free
  • The firm can reduce r units of emission at cost C(r)
  • The permit price on the market is P.

min in r of C(r)+ P( e-r-q)

P( e-r-q) : net supply/demand of permits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Describe The (First Best) Pigouvian Tax

A
  • Create a price for greenhouse gases so that firms that pollute have to pay a tax, per unit of emissions.
  • Generate opportunity cost that firms take into account and alters behaviour (internalising the externality)
  • Tax is an economic instrument: uses market forces to change behaviour of polluters (instead of direct regulation)
  • Tax has similar efficiency result to a tradable permit market
  • Tax should be placed directly on emissions and not on other criteria such as products (petrol, plastics): distortions may occur
  • Tax levied provides incentive to reduce emissions ⟹ in form of tax avoided
  • All adjust their firm specific abatement levels
  • If tax rate higher than MAC ⟹ incentive to reduce pollution
  • If tax rate is lower than MAC ⟹ incentive to pay tax (not abate pollution)
  • If tax rate is levied at t* efficient (and socially optimal) level of GHG pollution is attained without coercion or command and control regulation
  • “Internalizes the externality”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Compare TAX and Tradable permit market

A
  • Carbon taxes establishes well defined price for emissions known to firms so they can calculate costs of emissions reductions
  • •Can improve incentive to invest in R&D and long term capital

• In contrast, permit market:

  • As supply is fixed and demand can vary considerably: price is volatile and uncertain
  • Demand for permits changes for number of reasons: change in energy demand; fuel price changes
  • May reduce incentive to invest in abatement R&D

However: TPM Allows quantity of emissions to change in face of prevailing economic conditions (e.g. recession/ boom)
• Fixed tax allows quantity of emissions to change which may make sense to allow for nation-wide emissions to vary due to prevailing economic conditions
• In contrast, markets as often claimed:
- Do not have inherent flexibility in market. So could be more costly to firms
- Makes only economic sense to have this if we are rapidly approaching the threshold of atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations beyond which have dangerous impacts

• Existence of a “Hybrid schemes“
Tradable permit markets can be adapted to include:
- Price ceiling “safety valve” (to improve price stability): unlimited amount of permits that can be sold at the set “safety valve”
- Banking and borrowing of permits (to improve price stability)
- Reserve (to improve price stability): limited stock of permits that can be sold at a price ceiling
- Auctioning of permits (to obtain revenues for reduction in distortionary taxes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly