4a. Disputes Flashcards
Methods of dispute resolution
What are the four processes for resolving disputes?
- Litigation
- Negotiation
- Arbitration
- Mediation
Methods of dispute resolution
What does the fact negotiations are without prejudice mean?
Conversations cannot be relied on by parties or referred to in courts
Methods of dispute resolution
To keep in line with the overriding objective, which requires cases be resolved in a proportionate, expeditious and fair matter, how should ADR be considered?
- Lawyers should make their clients aware of it
- Possibility of ADR should be considered throughout a proceeding
Methods of dispute resolution
If a party considers ADR inappropriate, but does not set out their reasons, what can the court do?
Penalise the party in respect of legal costs that they can recover, or an order making them pay costs incurred by the other side as a result of the conduct
This applies to failure to follow Civ Pro rules generally
Methods of dispute resolution
What are the three key features of mediation?
- Parties can walk away at any time
- Strict rules of evidence do not apply
- Mediation is non-binding until final written agreement is signed
Pre-action considerations: limitation
What is the outcome where a solicitor incurs costs advancing a claim which is statute-barred?
They will be deemed negligent and not acting in client’s best interests
Pre-action considerations: limitation
What is the limitation period for:
(1) breach of contract and most claims in tort;
(2) personal injury and fatal accident claims;
(3) defamation claims;
(4) unfair dismissal claims?
- Six years
- Three years
- One year
- Three months
Pre-action considerations: limitation
What is the long stop limitation for latent defects?
Fifteen years
Pre-action considerations: limitation
In a tort action, when does the limitation period begin running?
Generally, from the date the cause of action accrues, i.e. when the tort occurs
Pre-action considerations: limitation
In a tort action where the claimant’s injury is not apparent, when does the limitation period begin running?
When the claimant first gains knowledge that they have a claim
Pre-action considerations: limitation
In a tort action, when is the date of knowledge considered to be?
Does the claimant need to know the precise details?
The point at which the claimant had sufficient knowledge of all the facts to commence investigations into the potential claim against the defendant
No, sufficient information is enough
Pre-action considerations: limitation
In a tort action, the date of knowledge does not occur until the claimant has knowledge of what four things?
In addition to knowing they have an injury, what must a claimant know?
- That the injury is significant
- That it is attributable in whole or part to the act or omission alleged
- Knowledge of the defendant
- Identity of any other actors if it is they who did the conduct, not D (e.g. hospital/doctor situation)
Causation, i.e. that the injury arose from a negligent act or omission of an identified defendant
Pre-action considerations: limitation
In a tort action, what are the two options for the limitation period if the injured party dies within three years of the accrual date?
Three years from:
- Date of death, or
- Date of knowledge of the deceased’s personal representative
Pre-action considerations: limitation
In a contract action, when does the limitation period begin running?
On the date of breach
Pre-action considerations: limitation
What is a make good clause in a contract and can they be used to override statutory limitation periods?
They are clauses, typically in construction contracts, that the construction company will make good on any defects for a period, usually 1-2 years, after construction.
They are irrelevant to statutory limitation periods, unless they expressly limit the period and are reasonable per Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977.
Pre-action considerations: limitation
Where there is a latent defect, what limitation period is available in addition to the general rule of six years from the date of accrual?
Three years from the earliest date on which the claimant knew or ought reasonably to have known material facts necessary to bring an action
Pre-action considerations: limitation
Is it possible to expressly shorten a limitation period in a contract?
Yes, but this will be subject to reasonableness requirements under the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (see contract law slides on exclusion causes)
Pre-action considerations: limitation
Procedurally, when does time (1) begin to run relative to the date the cause of action accrues and (2) stop running?
- The day after the date of accrual
- When the claimant delivers the properly completed claim form to the court with a request to issue together with the appropriate fee
Pre-action considerations: limitation
What occurs if the limitation period expires on a day when the court office is closed?
The action will still be on time as long as the documents/fee are filed on the next business day
Pre-action considerations: limitation
Is it possible to add a new party to proceedings after the limitation period has expired?
No, unless an application to disapply the limitation period is made to the court
Pre-action considerations: limitation
After the expiry of the limitation period, is it possible to amend the name of a mistakenly spelled/identified defendant in proceedings which were originally filed on time?
Yes
Pre-action considerations: limitation
When does the limitation period begin to run where a claimant is a minor?
On their 18th birthday
Pre-action considerations: limitation
When does the limitation period begin to run where a claimant lacks capacity at the time of accrual?
If a claimant has capacity at the time of accrual and subsequently loses capacity, is the clock paused?
When they are certified as being of sound mind
The clock is not paused
Pre-action considerations: limitation
When does the limitation period begin to run in cases of (1) fraud or concealment or (2) relief from the consequences of a mistake?
Pre-action considerations: protocols and applications
When the claimant discovers the fraud/concealment or mistake, or could have done so with reasonable diligence