4_External Environment Flashcards
What is a strategy ?
- A strategy is the integrated set of choices
- that positions the business in its industry
- so as to generate a sustainable competitive advantage
“integrated set of choices” => internal & external consistency of activities
What does sustainable a competitive advantage mean ?
A sustainable competitive advantage means that the business generates superior financial returns over the long run.
to know if you are generating superior financial returns you have to also understand the industry !
Starting from the business winning aspiration, which quetsions does a strategy answer ?
A strategy must answer to key questions:
- In which markets do we want to play?
- How can we win in these markets?
Why is it important to understand markets ?
Because:
- Industry-level profitability persistently differs
-
firm-level profitability within the same industry differs!
- Why do they deffer and how can firms exploit/avoid the industry forces ? To understand this, see Porter’s five forces
What is the background behind Porter’s 5 Forces ?
What did people do before ?
- Porter’s key insight in the 1970s was that managers defined competition too narrowly
- Porter’s 5 forces provides framework to anticipate and influence future profitability
- His framework is the most popular strategy framework
- Framework reveals roots of industry’s current profitability
- By looking at the current profitability of an industry, you can understand WHY they are profitable.
- While all industries are influenced by these forces, their relative influence differs
- It is a broad network, that you can apply to every industry. But the influence of these powers is going to differ accross the industries.
What is the value system of Porter
or so called vertical chain in a single-industry firm?
In which direction can a firm go ?
- Firms form a value system (vertical chain) with each other
- Firm is part of an vertical chain - Porter called this a “value system”.
- *Upstream** = what comes earlier: suppliers with their own value chain > provide input factors to firm.
- *Downstream** = additional firms with each of them having their own value chain: channel and buyers.
- Each firm in this value system operates its own value chain
-
Forward Integration: a firm can forward integrate itself by extending its activities downstream (channel value chains, Buyer value chains)
- Supplier extends value chain to buyer activities
- E.g. when the cupcake maker wants to sell himself his cupcakes. Manufacterer sends to end consumers
-
Backward integration: a firm can backward integrate itself by extending its activities upstream (supplier value chains)
- Buyer extends value chain to supplier activities
- Backery shop doesn’t want to buy from an independent supplier but decides to produce them themselves
What are Porter’s Five forces ?
- Threat of Entry
- Power of Suppliers
- Power of Buyers
- Threat os Substitutes
- Direct Rivalry
- Additional Force:
- NOT PESTEL analysis & MACROENVIRONMENT. These only create opportunities and threats for firms in an industry. They are factors !
- Complements ?
What can be the effects of (threat of) new entrants?
When can you at best enter a market ?
Give an example of low and high barrier to entry
First force of Porter’s 5 Forces
New entrants in an industry can quickly erode (=affaiblir) profits by increasing competition, introducing alternative products, and capturing market share.
New players are best able to make inroads (=percer) when the incumbent (=actual) players do not benefit from economies of scale, a strong brand identity, or proprietary knowledge in such environments: low barriers to entry
Threat of entrance is low when new entrance cannot get good distribution chanels or they are at a specific disadvantage at entry.
Illustration of concept:
Starbucks: If Starbucks decided to be more expensive, other people could decide to start selling coffee (and not as quite expensive). But because Starbucks anticipate this, they cannot overcharge their customers and must constantly innovate so that no body thinks that there is a potential to enter in the market. Thus Starbucks must constantly keep their prices in a range. Entry barrier is low !
Illustration High vs Low Force:
Low threat of entrance (high barrier): entrace cannot get good distribution channels or a specific disadvantage when entering
high barrier to entry: retailer of one country can’t enter an other country easily, because all the good positions are already taken ! When you want to open a new retail shop in Lucern, it will be difficult, because all the great spots (location) are taken. So you have to offer them something extra (in order for costumers to go to a less attractive spot)
low barrier entry with Apps. There are relatively low barriers to developing applications (apps) for Android smartphones and the Apple iPhone; all it takes are a few software developers and an idea. This makes it possible for startup developers to enter and quickly grow, and makes it difficult for existing app providers to charge a significant price premium, which explains in part the low prices of most apps.
High barrier (possible response to stop new entrance) Consumer Switcher Costs = if you switch to an other software, you have to learn how to use them - the higher the switching costs are, the more difficult it is to enter.
What are the influence factors for the threat of entry ?
Give more barriers to Entry
First Force of Porter’s 5 Forces
- Supply side economies of scale and scope or experience (exploit network effects and economies of scale)
- FedEx has a lower cost per package than a potential new entrant because of its large scale
- Demand side benefits of scale
- eBay is more attractive to buyers than smaller competitors because of its large number of sellers (sellers also benefit from more buyers)
- Create customer switching costs
- Microsoft Windows users who may want to switch to another operating system must buy new software and learn how to use the new operating system
- Capital costs
- a large required capital commitment can deter new entrants
- Invest to preempt (=empêcher) entry
- Incumbency advantages
- incumbent mining companies may have locked up the best reserves
- Unequal access (lock in) distribution channels
- Movie producers with a track record and established relationships have an advantage in getting cinema distribution
- Anticipated vigorous incumben response
- the threat of price cuts or expensive advertising campaigns by deeppocketed incumbents can deter entry
- Develop a reputation for retaliation (=menace, sanction, victime?)
- Restrictive government policies: exploit patent protection
- patents can deter market entry by imitators
- High barriers to exit:
- high labor severance costs can deter market entry
- Slow indutry growth
- Newcomers must take share from incumbents
Thus possible responses to the threat of new entrants are: exploit network and economies of scale. Create customer switching costs. invest to preempt entry. Lock in distribution channels. Develope a reputation for retaliation. Exploit patent protection.
Generally, when is supplier bargaining power high ?
Give an example/illustration of a powerful supplier
Second force of Porter’s 5 Forces
If suppliers offer a unique product, have made it difficult to switch to other suppliers, or are more concentrated than the industry they serve, then they can raise the prices at which they supply the industry.
A powerful supplier group can drive up costs that industry players are unable to pass on to their customers.
Examples:
Coca-Cola, with its powerful brand and flavor, is a perfect example. It sells its exclusive, proprietary soda concentrate to bottlers – there are relatively many of them – which have limited flexibility to raise prices, thus constraining industry profits.
Illustration of concept:
Windows 10: no other operating system for PC - microsoft = powerful and can lead the prices.
High vs Low illustration of concept:
Pharma industry: much greater power in bargaining than manufacturer of generics.
Bloomberg: if the consumer has big switching costs, he’ll pay more to avoid the switching costs and can stay where he once is.
Specifically, what are the influence factors for the power of suppliers ?
Give more barriers to entry of suppliers
Second force of Porter’s 5 Forces
- Suppliers are more concentrated than the industry rivals
- Ex: Microsoft and Intel have bargining power because of their dominant market shares and fragmented PC manufacturing customers
- Marktstruktur bei den Lieferanten lässt dem Unternehmen wenig Ausweichmöglichkeiten zu alternativen Lieferanten und erleichtert es den Lieferanten, hohe Preise durchzusetzen
- Industry participants face switching costs
- Ex: A supplier has more bargaining power if it is difficult for customers to switch to competing suppliers
- Suppliers offer differentiated products / unique product
- If customers believe suppliers products differ significantly, competition is reduced and prices tend to increase
-
Few substitutes for supplier products
- Suppliers of patented pharmaceuticals with unique benefits have significant bargaining power
- Credible threat of forward integration
- Suppliers who can credibly threaten to compete with their customers have more bargaining power than those who cannot
- Suppliers do not depend heavily on the industry
- Suppliers who do not depend on the industry have less incentive to moderate price demands
Thus possible responses to threats to profitability because of bargaining power of suppliers are: Use standard instead of proprietary products. Secure multiple sources. Encourage mutual dependence.
When are buyers powerful?
Third force of Porter’s 5 Forces
Powerful customers can also affect industry profitability.
An industry’s buyers are powerful if they are concentrated or are free to direct their purchases elsewhere.
The U.S. retail industry has seen buyer power increasingly consolidated to Walmart, Target, and several drugstore chains. The many industries that sell through those channels have seen their profit margins squeezed because they have no other customers of comparable size and those retailers have the wherewithal to switch vendors.
Everything that makes the supplier powerful, makes the buyer less powerful
Ilustration of concept
Bananas in the UK Market
What makes the buyer more powerful: Buyers are more concentrated and are going to buy a large chunk of the supplier. With the example of the banana, the retailers keep the bigger value (40%). Because there are relatively few retailers (or relatively large retailers like Carrefour), they can dictate the price to the suppliers and keep a larger piece of the revenue for themselves.
Illustration High vs Low Force: key question: when are buyers less price sensitive ?
Whenever a buyer requires an input factor from a supplier that really has an input on the buyers quality, then he is going to be less price sensitive.
E.g. Hollywoord studio which is making motion pictures. The quality of the movie is going to depend on the quality of the cameras. So they are going to be less sensitive to the price of cameras, because the cameras have an impact on the final quality of the movie.
When the quality of the product has an impact on other costs of the buyer, then there might be less price sensitivy. E.g. Industry of dishwashes for restaurants. A good machine then requires less labour costs.
Specifically, what are the influence factors for the power of buyers ?
Give more examples of when barriers to entry is high
Third force of Porter’s 5 Forces
- Customers are more concentrated than the industry they buy from
- Retailers such as Walmart are more concentrated than their suppliers, and have significant bargaining power = Eine oligopolistische (oder gar monopolistische) Marktstruktur bei den Abnehmern lässt dem Unternehmen wenig alternative Absatzmöglichkeiten und erleichtert es den Kunden, niedrige Preise durchzusetzen.
- Customers face few switching costs
- Airline customers have substantial bargaining power because they have low switching costs
- Industry products are undifferentiated
- If customers believe suppliers products do not differ significantly, the customer has more pricing power
- Credible threat of backward integration
- Customers who can credibly threaten to manufacture their own inputs have more bargaining power than those who cannot
-
Industry purchases represent a significant fraction of their cost
- Customers will be more sensitive to the price of inputs that have a bigger impact on their bottom line
- Hohe Bedeutung des jeweiligen Verkaufs für das Unternehmen, d.h. das Einkaufsvolumen eines Kunden macht einen hohen Anteil am Gesamtumsatz des Unternehmens aus
- Customers earn low profits
- Inputs have a proportinally greater impact on the profits of low-profit customers than they do on those of high-profit customers
- Customers quality is not substantially affected by the industry
- Where quality in not affected the customer has no incentive to accept a higher-priced, higher quality input
Thus possible responses to threats to profitability because of bargaining power of buyers are: Build customer loyalty. Traget small customers. “Lock in” customers to increase switching costs. DIfferentiate the product. Target customer segments that are less sensitive to price.
When are substitutes powerful?
Fourth force of Porter’s 5 Forces
When multiple products from different industries all serve the same purpose for customers, they are called substitutes.
They place a ceiling on an industry’s ability to increase prices and grow.
Taxi fares, for example, are kept in check in cities with robust public transportation.
Illustration of concept:
Phones (Nowadays): phones are substiutes for cameras
Zoom: using zoom is a substitute for business travels virtual meetings (threat for airlines)
High vs Low Force llustration: high, when the subsitiute offers a better value for money
Train/Bus: switching costs to move to the subsitute - travelling by bus or train: switching costs are low.
Train/ Motorbike: switching from train to motorcycle, costs are high (Töffbillet etc.) because need a licence etc.
The switching cost may not always be uniformly distributed, in the sense that everybody suffers from the same switching costs but there are different groups of people which might be affected differently according to the substitutes
Specifically, what are the factors for the threat of substitutes ?
Give more barriers to entry of substitutes
Fourth force of Porter’s 5 Forces
- “closeness” of substitute
- The closer the substitue, the easier it is to switch to it
- Performance / Price ratio of substitute
- A substitute that offers slightly lower performance at a much lower price is more of a threat than one that offers slightly lower performance with only a small reduciton in price
Thus possible responses to threats to profitability because of substitutes are: Cannibalize the business before others do. Target consumers of substitutes with new product offerings. Exploit complements.