4.2.6 International Economy Flashcards
(108 cards)
Define globalisation.
Process in which national economies have become increasingly integrated (closer together) + inter-dependent (more reliant on each other).
State + explain the causes of globalisation.
- Trade Liberalisation: through greater role of WTO - more countries signing up - lead to trade barriers reducing, more trade taking place between nations.
- Trading Blocs: more / deeper trading blocs - allows countries to be more integrated.
- Growth Of MNCS: bigger they’ve gotten - more they’ve dispersed around the world - greater integration.
- Technological Advances: in transport - easier to transport goods + services, easier for firms to set up around the world. Software development - growth of internet - allows firms to have major outlets all around the world.
- Greater Mobility Of Labour + Capital: nations more integrated - could be due to trading blocs + government policies - encourages more migration + spread of capital around the world.
State + explain the cons of globalisation.
- Growing Inequality: even though there’s massive increases in profit, incomes, T rev collections - hasn’t been spread equally amongst worlds population - those who have been living in poverty for a long period of time - still living in extreme poverty. Those in relative poverty still struggling to break class thresholds + break into higher classes. Trickle-down effect not necessarily seen - needs to be greater push for nations + politicians to focus on alleviating poverty + help those on lower incomes.
- Higher Structural Unemployment: risk that as a nation, as you become more intergrated - struggle to compete - could lead to businesses going into decline, loosing out to international competition - leads to greater structural unemployment - people loosing their jobs, incomes, + livelihood - major issue in developing countries - where there isn’t safety net of strong welfare state.
- Environmental Costs: more pollution - foreign firms take advantage of resources - resource depletion - in order for firms to produce. Future generations suffer - wont see same benefits of us - lack of sustainability. Environmental costs significantly outweigh some benefits of globalisation.
- Trade Imbalances: more globalisation has taken hold - more countries have realised that relying on X led growth could be a very bad way of growing + developing (e.g. China - realised massive X gains as result of more integrated economy - if avenue slows down - may lead to more protectionist activity + trade wars to correct trade imbalances).
- Greater Risk Of External Shocks: due to integration - if one country goes down, could take down another country as well.
- Less Cultural Diversity: same kind of outlets / MNCs / goods + services on offer in different countries. Countries loose their own identity + sercuming to same kind of D for every single person in economy. Countries loose uniqueness.
Define multinational corporations (MNCs).
Corporate organisation that owns/controls production of goods/services in at least 1 other country other than its hone country (e.g. have multiple branches.
State + explain the positive effects that MNCs have on MEDCs / HICs.
- Provides Employment, With Higher W: due to being in a developed country, with a high NMW.
- Source Of Tax Revenue: developed country has a strong tax system, MNC pays more tax-therefore provides a source of tax revenue to government.
- Will Increase Consumer Choice + Consumption
- More FDI: leads to better infrastructure.
- Better Patent Control + IP Laws: meaning products will be better protected, innovation is protected, greater incentive for firms to+ individuals to produce, as they know their ideas are protected.
- Might Bring Along More + Improved Tech (infrastructure)
State + explain the negative effects that MNCs have on MEDCs / HICs.
• Standardisation means MNCs will impact culture that’s already there.
• Environmental Impact
• Transfer Pricing to send profits to LEDCs with little taxes (overflow of capital)
State + explain the positive effects that MNCs have on LEDCs / LICs.
• Provide an inflow of capital (FDI), that essentially determines level of growth of an LEDCs. (Harrod-Domar model).
• Inflow of capital can finance a current account deficit.
• Create jobs where factors are made: more employment + better working standards (to maintain CSR)
• Can create infrastructure which other people can use (also improve skills of workforce).
• MNCs can help diversify LEDCs from relying on primary products + agriculture
State + explain the negative effects that MNCs have on LEDCs / LICs.
• LEDC have a lot of corruption: MCNS can avoid taxing.
• MNCs take advantage of weaker environment legislation to dispose of their waste (e.g. India is big in waste disposal market).
• Overall profit sent back to MNCs- meaning a weaker inflow of capital.
• When employing ‘skilled labour’ MNC goes somewhere else- loca; workers miss out + I is diffused.
• Sweat-shop labour + low W.
• Extraction of raw material in LEDCs are short-term inflows of I- meaning citizens aren’t compensated enough.
Define absolute advantage.
Occurs when country can produce product using fewer FOPS than another nation.
Define comparative advantage.
- States that country should specialise in goods + services it can produce at lowest opportunity cost, + then trade with another country.
- Quantity/quality of factor endowments at a given nation will determine what goods/services nations have a comparative advantage in.
- Specialisation + trade should increase total output.
State the limitations + assumptions of comparative advantage.
- No Transport Costs
- Perfect Information: for consumers about P.
- No Economies Of Scale.
- Non-Price Factors Play No Part In Consumers Decisions: brand loyalty, reputation, R&D, innovation, quality, e.t.c.
State + explain the reasons for patterns of trade.
- Comparative Advantage: main reason.
- Trade Blocs: if countries members of trading blocks (e.g. EU) - naturally, going to be trading more with countries in that trading block due to free-trade benefit of being in a trading block.
- Protectionism: protectionist barriers block X + M - not going to be trading much with countries that have huge protectionist barriers (e.g. tariffs, import quotas) on X. Going to be trading more with countries whom you have free trading agreements with / less protectionist barriers.
- Transport Costs: UK doesn’t trade hugely with countries that are really far away (e.g. countries in South Asia) - most of UK trade occurs with countries in Europe + USA.
- Non-Price Factors: country may have comparative advantage, but other country may beat them when it comes to branding, advertising, quality, e.t.c.
- Exchange Rate: countries with comparative advantage but a strong exchange rate - makes X dearer - can erode comparative advantage.
- Inflation Rates: countries with comparative advantage can see that erode with high rates of inflation.
Define free trade.
Trade between countries without barriers / obstacles.
State + explain the benefits of free trade.
- Exploit Comparative Advantage: specialise where they have lower opportunity cost, max output, produce at lowest P + gain allocative efficiency - resources diverted to countries whom are most efficient producers - to max output + satisfy as much consumer D as possible.
- Lower Prices + Higher Quantity: consumers benefit. Due to comparative advantage exploitation + that firms can access EoS due to selling all around the world - reducing their AC - reducing P, global competition helps drive P down + Q up.
- Higher Profits For Firms: especially where they have comparative advantage, but also where they can exploit EoS + obtain lower AC, + due to tech advancements, sell into greater marekt, e.t.c. Can reinvest into advanced tech, pay shareholders higher dividends, pay off debt. Countries can benefit macro economically - increases X - M in AD equation - boosting economic growth.
- Higher Economic Growth: higher income + job creation - major benefit of free trade. Drives people out of poverty, boosts living standards.
- Greater Technology Diffusion: tech spreads faster around the world - as firms can access M more easily + copy tech easily, can also reinvest profits into advancing tech - good for consumers whom benefit from brand new innovative goods + services, lower P + higher Q- also good for producers - can patent new ideas/ new tech - allows them to get ahead of rivals.
State + explain the negatives of free trade.
- Overspecialisation: comparative advantage can result in overspecialisation - becomes too reliant on output of 1 industry - don’t get balanced growth - what if there’s D / S side shock? Can result in inequality - those working in industry with comparative advantage may earn higher income. Very reliant on M - what if there’s international relation issues, transport issues, e.t.c.
- Unfair Trade Practices: assume there’s free trade, but what if countries are using unfair trade practices (e.g. gov subsiding producers heavily - creates excess S - then dumped abroad? Decimates foreign industries - illegal trade practice, but can still happen.
- Unemployment: industries without comparative advantage deplete - deindustrialisation - big rise in structural unemployment - holds back economic growth + living standards, drags down gov finances.
- Standards: assumption there wont be any standards / regulations protecting product safety, worker rights, environmental standards, e.t.c. Maximising output can lead to environmental trade offs - air pollution, deforestation, desertification, resource depletion.
- Current Account: if country doesn’t have significant comparative advantage compared to other countries - may lead to value of M exceeding value of X - leading to trade deficits + CA deficit.
Define protectionist policies (protectionism).
Barriers to trade to protect domestic firms from foreign competition.
State + explain the types of protectionism.
Traditional Barriers:
* Tariff: most common type of barrier - tax on M that raises P of M.
* Quota: Q limit on M that are allowed to enter country - creates excess D domestically + increases P of M.
* Embargo: ban on M - see this for political reasons - in times of war, human rights issues, e.t.c.
* Domestic Subsidies: lowers CoPs for domestic firms + encourages them to increase their output.
* Exchange Rate Devaluation: gov / central banks can intervene in foreign exchange markets to weaken currency + give domestic producers advantage of cheaper X.
Administrative Barriers:
* Red Tape: paperwork / bureaucracy that foreign producers need to go through to sell their goods in another country - time it takes , effort it takes, cost it takes - may be so much that firms give up - acts as barrier.
* Standards / Regulations: countries could impose / raise standards - making it harder for foreign producers to meet standards + sell goods in (e.g. health + safety standards, environmental standards, e.t.c.) - acting as block to M.
State the reasons for protectionism.
- Infant Industry Argument: if there are newly developing firms in nation that haven’t had time to grow + become as big as international rivals - gov may decide to put tariff / tax / quota on M coming in - to allow domestic firms to grow in size + to develop same kind of EoS - gives them leverage to compete with big international corporations. Give domestic firms time to grow + develop these EoS - then take away protectionist measures when they can compete. (short-term protectionism) However, can allow room for inefficiency - distorts theory.
- Protect Against ‘Dumping’: dumping - where certain country decides to sell goods / services below CoPs (i.e. if there’s excess subsidies given, may be excess S - nation may dump them below CoPs in other countries) - countries where goods / services are dumped are hit very hard - domestic firms can’t compete with P below C. Thus, gov imposes protectionist measures (e.g. tax, embargo, e.t.c.). However, dumping is very hard to prove - often comes from subsides / min P in given nation.
- Protect Domestic Employment: if gov feels like domestic employment will suffer + there could be massive structural unemployment issues if industry goes into decline, due to how difficult it is to compete with firms abroad - may decide to adopt protectionist measures to protect employment. However, if industry was already going into decline + losing its comparative advantage - longing out process that’s already going to happen - argument may be to allow workers to move into other industries + accept SR C of unemployment.
- Protect Against ‘Unfair’ Low Cost Labour Abroad: may decide to protect against M coming in from those nations (e.g. Asia - if countries feel they can’t compete with their low C L - may decide to use protectionist measure against them to give them level playing field).
- Protect Product Standards: strict environmental standards, product standards. To protect against certain type of standard of goods coming into country.
- Raise Government Revenue: especially for developing countries. Imposing a tariff - generates gov revenue - can be used in developing countries to fund important things (e.g. infrastructure, public goods, merit goods)
- To Improve Current Account Deficit: weak argument in reality - due to retaliation expected. However, in theory, if M huge amounts - imposing protectionist measures reduces spending on M + helps improve CA deficit - potentially improving economic growth - AD equation increases due to (X - M) improving.
- Avoid Risk Of Over-Specialisation: by protecting yourself from M coming in - allows country to delve into other industries - make sure that if major industry goes into decline / struggles to compete with foreign competition - there’s other industries out there.
State the disadvantages of protectionism.
- Market Distortion: free-market economists oppose tariffs - distorting an efficient allocation of resources that satisfied as many stakeholders as possible. Now there’s detrimental effect - particularly on consumers - loss of CS + DWL - to higher P + less choice available.
- Production Inefficiencies: allocation of resources worsened - significant problem - domestic producers supplying higher Q - wasteful - need higher P to produce these, due to being less efficient - have higher C than world S.
- Retaliation: from nation in which tariff has been imposed on - expect retaliation to be much stronger - hurts consumers + makes inefficiencies worse - distorts benefits of free-trade.
- Regressive: consumers bear burden of tariff - typically on necessity items - hurts those on low incomes the most.
Evaluate the use of protectionist policies.
- Size Of Tariff: + impact it has on market.
- Elasticity of Domestic Supply + Demand: if inelastic - extension of S for domestic suppliers will increase but not by very much. Contraction in D - there’ll be a fall, but not by very much - fall in M small.
Define an import quota.
Quantity limit placed on number of M coming into country.
State + explain the arguments for import quotas.
- Infant Industry: protect infant industries + let them grow. Domestic S increases from Q1, to Q1 + Q3,Q4 - allowing firms to benefit from EoS.
- Dumping: now with higher P for M coming in - negates dumping effect.
- Protect Domestic Employment: with more domestic S - at worse expect employment to stay the same, most likely increase.
- Low Cost Labour: protect against low C L + artificial advantage that comes from that.
- Improve CA Position: M heavily restricted - hope M expenditure reduces enough to improve nations CA position.
Explain the effect of an import quota.
- Price: increased from Pw to PW + Quota.
- Domestic Demand: contracted from Q2 to Q4.
- Domestic Supply: increased from Q1 to Q1 + Q3,Q4
- Imports: fallen from Q1Q2 to Q1Q3
- Domestic Producer Revenue: increased from a to a + e + c + h + i
- Foreign Producer Revenue: unclear whether it increased / decreased - depends on figures. However changed from b + c + d to b + f + g.
- DWL: i + j
Define a trade subsidy.
Subsidy given to domestic suppliers in order to reduce their CoP + for them to pass that lower C on by lower P - makes it easier for these producers to compete with worldwide firms + to export their products more easily.