4.2 Strategies, methods and equipment for the sampling and measurement of airborne contaminants Flashcards
Monitoring of hazardous substances is necessary: 4
when failure of control measures could result in a serious health effect
to demonstrate that a WEL is not being exceeded
as an additional check on the effectiveness of control measures
when changes in work occur that could affect employees’ exposure, for example:
increase in quantity of a substance used; new systems of work or new plant.
There are different types of monitoring and equipment that may be required. These
relate to the following terms. 3
Type of sampling: personal or static (environmental).
Timescales: short or long term.
Types of equipment: direct reading or indirect reading; active or passive air
sampling.
Active air sampling
Uses a calibrated air pump to draw a known
volume of air over the reagent, over a known
period of time.
Passive air sampling
Allows air to diffuse over the sampling head
which may be a badge, impinger / bubbler or
dosimeter tube (no pump).
stages of the monitoring strategy
Initial appraisal Basic survey Detailed survey Reappraisal Routine monitoring
The initial appraisal is
Qualitative sampling methods may be used to carry out the initial appraisal, for
example:
Smoke tubes can illustrate the movement of air under the influence of draughts, general and local exhaust ventilation systems, and show what the effects are.
A dust lamp helps to identify emission sources and watch the movement of airborne dust.
Smell can also be used as an indicator of contamination, however, this is an
unreliable method.
If the initial appraisal were to indicate that there would be significant exposure, a
basic survey would be necessary.
A basic survey is
The basic survey estimates employees’ personal exposure and provides an indication of the efficiency of process and engineering controls.
It usually surveys the worst-case situations, for example: the ‘dirtiest’, or where employees have made complaints.
Qualitative and semi-quantitative sampling methods can be used to estimate personal exposure. These provide a rough numerical estimate of exposure.
Some semi-quantitative methods are comparatively inexpensive and easy to use, for example: chemical indicator tubes or dust lamps.
Some semi-quantitative methods are comparatively inexpensive and easy to use,
for example:
chemical indicator tubes or dust lamps.
The basic survey may highlight defects and deficiencies in control strategies. If the
conclusion is not certain, there will be two choices:
(1) To carry out a more detailed survey and take remedial action as necessary.
(2) Take direct action to control exposure.
A detailed survey may be required when:
The extent and pattern of exposure cannot be confidently assessed by a basic
survey.
Exposure is highly variable between employees doing similar tasks.
Carcinogenic substances, respiratory sensitisers or mutagens are involved.
Undertaking major maintenance and one-off jobs, such as plant decommissioning
The initial appraisal and basic survey suggest that:
- the time-weighted personal exposure may be very close to the WEL
- the cost of additional control measures cannot be justified without evidence
of the extent of exposure variability.
A detailed survey would have a greater emphasis on personal sampling over longer
periods of time, and the taking of a greater number of samples over a wider range of
conditions. More sophisticated quantitative sampling methods and equipment
would be used, for example:
those reliant on laboratory analysis and biological
monitoring
A detailed survey will require an in-depth investigation of the process, and its
environment, including: 11
Existing CoSHH assessments.
Procedures and work methods.
Maintenance procedures.
Existing control measures and their suitability, For example: the results of the
annual examination and testing of the local exhaust ventilation could be
compared with its commissioning data.
Existing PPE provided and its suitability. For example: the
comparison of the
chemical resistance of gloves against information contained in material safety
data sheets (MSDS).
Workplace exposure limits, with a comparison between actual exposures from
personal sampling to the relevant WELs
Results of biological monitoring and those of biological monitoring guidance
values (BMGV).
Previous environmental monitoring results.
Results of health surveillance programmes.
Information and instruction provided to the employees for carrying out the tasks
involved.
Training provided to employees.
A reappraisal is
an assessment to determine whether changes to control measures
have had a positive effect.
Schedule 5 of the CoSHH Regulations requires continuous monitoring for the
following chemical exposures:
Vinyl chloride monomer.
Hexavalent chromium: every 14 days for sprays given off from vessels during
electroplating processes.
Factors which influence the release and airborne
concentration of substances include: 7
Physical and chemical properties of the substance, for example: vapour pressure,
boiling point and particle size.
The number of sources from which the substance is released.
Rate, duration and speed of release from each source.
Arrangement of the process, temperature and design of the control measures.
Variations in the process, job and tasks being carried out, for example: hour, day
or even week.
Dispersion or mixing of the substance in the workplace air due to general or local
ventilation.
Ambient conditions (temperature, pressure and humidity).
From the exposure monitoring results the following conclusions may be made: 4
The data is, or is not, adequate and/or representative of all those exposed.
Compliance with WELs, etc. has, or has not, been achieved.
Further actions are, or are not, necessary to prevent or reduce exposure.
More monitoring is, or is not, needed.
Qualitative methods are
simple observational techniques that do not involve any
quantified measurement. They rely on judgment, knowledge and experience. The
threshold of smell and the Tyndall light beam are examples of qualitative sampling
methods.
The strengths of using stain detector tubes
Relatively cheap. Simple to use – no major costs for training or expertise. Direct reading – immediate result. Provides an indication of the need for more sophisticated measurement.
The weaknesses of using stain detector tubes
Substance specific – the correct tube must be specified for the suspected contaminant. Only suitable for chemical contaminants (gases and fume). Not very accurate – variables include: bellows efficiency wrong number of pumps cross sensitivity and date sensitivity of tubes sampling point – proximity to contaminant. A grab sample may miss the presence of the contaminant.
Qualitative sampling methods (examples)
Threshold of smell
Tyndall light beam
Semi-qualitative sampling methods (examples)
stain detector tube
Personal monitoring sampling apparatus consists of:
a sampling head,
positioned in the wearers breathing zone (clipped to collar, for example), connected
with tubing to a calibrated portable medium flow pump (powered by rechargeable
battery) and clipped to a belt or carried in a holster
There are four types of sampling head recommended for particulate sampling:
IOM
sampling head, multi-orifice total inhalable sampler, conical inhalable sampler and
respirable dust cyclone sampler.
The process for taking a personal sample is as follows: 11
(1) A filter is dried out in a clean area and weighed.
(2) The sampling head is cleaned before use.
(3) The pre-weighed filter is placed in a sampling head in a clean, dust-free
environment.
(4) Each sampler is labelled so that it can be uniquely identified and sealed with
its protective cover, or plug, to prevent contamination.
(5) The volumetric flow rate is set, for example: two litres per minute (±0.1
litre/min).
(6) Each loaded sampler is connected to a sampling pump, ensuring that no leaks
can occur.
(7) The protective cover from the sampler is removed.
(8) The sampling pump is then switched on, and attached to a calibrated flow
meter so that it measures the flow through the sampler’s inlet orifice(s).
(9) Air is drawn through the filter over a known period of time, for example: 4
hours.
(10) The filter is then sent to an approved laboratory to be dried out again for
gravimetric analysis.
(11) The filter is re-weighed.
The volume of air passing through the sampler is calculated by
multiplying the
mean volumetric flow rate in cubic metres per minute by the sampling time in
minutes
Average dust concentration (mg/m3) =
The net weight gain (mg) of the sample substrate is divided by the volume of air
sampled (m3)
The strengths of personal dust sampling are
Accurate
Indicates the workers actual exposure
during real work activity
Allows direct comparison to workplace exposure limits (WEL)
Can be used to identify a chemical
The weaknesses of personal dust sampling are
Expensive
Requires expertise to set up
Time consuming (sample to lab for analysis)
May be tampered with by wearer
Spectrometry, spectroscopy and chromatography are
analysis techniques that
can identify both the chemical and its concentration
Spectrometry
measures the intensity of light in a part of the spectrum specially
transmitted or emitted by particular substances. This is measured using a
spectrophotometer.
Spectroscopy
Spectroscopy is concerned with the investigation and measurement spectra produced when matter interacts with or emits electromagnetic radiation. It relates to the dispersion of an object's light into its component colors (i.e. energies). By performing this dissection and analysis of an object's light, analysts can infer the physical properties of that object, for example: temperature, mass, luminosity and composition.
Chromatography
Chromatography is the separation of a mixture by passing it in solution or
suspension, or as a vapour (as in gas chromatography), through a medium in which
the components move at different rates.
The mixture is dissolved in a fluid called the
‘mobile phase’, which carries it through a
structure holding another material called the
‘stationary phase’. The various constituents of
the mixture travel at different speeds, causing
them to separate.
Chromatography can separate complex mixtures with great precision. Even very
similar components, such as proteins that may only vary by a single amino acid, can
be separated with chromatography.