4.1.1 Moscovici et al - Minority Influence Flashcards
when was moscovici et al studie conducted
1969
what was the official name of moscovici et al’s studie
Minority influence
What was the aim of Moscovici
To investigate the effects of a consistent minority on a majority
What was the method used to carry out Moscovici et al
192 female partipants separated in groups of six with two confederates per group of six.
The groups where asked to judge the colour of the slides. All slides where blue however the brightness varied.
The confederates where in some groups consistently saying all 36 slides where green while in other groups claiming only have 24 where green.
A control group was used with no confederates
What where the results of moscovici et al
control group - green 0.25%
Consistent group - green 8.4% - 32% called the slides green at least once.
Inconsistent group - green 1.25%
What was the conclusion of moscovici
The confederates where in the minority however their views influenced the majority
The more consistent group had more influence in the majority
What are some negative evaluations of moscovici et al
- Lacked ecological validity as it was a laboratory experiment and the task were artificial
- The participants may have felt that judging the colour of the slides was a trivial exercise and they may have acted differently if their principles were involved
- The results cannot be generalised as only women participated
What are some positive evaluations for moscovici et al
- As there was a control group, we know that the participants were actually influenced by the minority rather than being independently unsure of the colour of the slides
- In a similar experiment, participants were asked to write down the colour rather than saying it out loud. In this conclusion, even more people agreed with the minority, which provides more support for minority influence.
What are the characteristics needed for a minority group to influence social change
Consistent
Committed
Flexible
Why is consistency important for achieving social change
If people are consistently talking about the same issue then they will be more consider the issue
Why is commitment so important in brining social change
When a minority adopts a committed approach to its position it may become difficult to ignore because joining a minority has a greater cost for the individual, they need to know the serious nature of the campaign or issue
Why is flexibility so important in brining about social change
Some people believe that consistency can be interpreted negatively by some and therefore being flexible with their position benefited their cause
Why is deeper processing so important in changing the minds of majority
People where less willing to change their view point having heard the view of a minority group than they where having heard the view of a majority group
What is some research support for depth of thought
In a study participants where spit into two groups where some heard the viewpoint of the minority and others heard the view point of the majority but both views where the same. Their support was measured
They then heard a conflicting viewpoint and their support was measured again. They where less willing to change having heard the minority view point than majority.
This suggests there is more depth of thought from listening to a minority compared to listening to a majority
What is some supporting evidence that internalisation can cause support of minority to increase
A study found in private more people would agree with a minority and even those who originally supported the majority where convinced by the minority
People where reluctant in public to admit this through not wanting to seem awkward or like and outsider