4.1 Economic and agricultral Developments Flashcards
econ 1945-53
4th 5 year plan aims
- 1946-50
- to catch up w usa
- rebuild heavy industry + transport
- revive the Ukraine - 1/3 expenditure allocated here
econ 1945-53
4th 5 year plan detail
- use of extensive reparations from East germany
- maintences of wartime controls on labour force - long hours, low wages. high targets]
- canals and HEP plants
econ 1945-53
4th 5 year plan results
- USSR 2nd to us in industrial capital
- most heavy industry targets met
- production doubled
- uberan workforce increased 67-72 mil
- industrially stronger than pre-war
econ 1945-53
5th 5 year plan aims
- 1951-55
- dev heavy industry and transport
- consumer goods, housing + services recieve stronger investment
econ 1945-53
5th five year plan details
- continued 4th five year plan but resources diverted to rearmerment during Korean war (50-53)
- After stalins death, Malenkov reduced expenditure of military and heavy industry
econ 1945-53
5th five year plan results
- most growth target smet
- NI increased 71%
- Malenkov changes met opposition resulting in him loosing leadership
agriculture 45-53
4th 5 year plan details
- Massive state direction: high quotas for grain and livestock/low peasant wages
- Higher taxes on produce from privare plots and private land absorbed in the war returned to kolkhozes
- Tree plantations, canals and irrigation ditches to make more land usable
- Followed Ideas of scientist Trofim Lysenko
agriculture 45-53
4th 5 year plan aims
- force Kolkhozes to deliver agriculture products
- revive wheat fields of ukraine
- transform nature + revitalise barren land
agriculture 45-53
4th five year plan results
- State precured 70 per cent of 1946 harvest, leaving peasants with little
- Output of kolkhozes increased (and food rationing ended 1947) but not to 1930s levels
- Incentives remained lowr
- Almost a half of output carne from private plots
- Lagged behind industry
- Lysenko’ ideas perpetuated inaccurate theories which held farming back.
agriculture 45-53
5th five year plan aims
- Continuation of the Fourth Five Year Plan’s alms plus Khrushchev’s initiative to develop virgin lands
and build ‘agrocities’ from 1953
agriculture 45-53
5th five year plan details
- High procurement levels maintained
- Expansion of agriculture in formerly uncultivated areas
agriculture 45-53
5th five year plan results
Agricultural production still behind industry and not yet to level of 1940
Decentralization and Industrial Planning under Krushchev
Industrial Targets and Administration
- Moscow-based ministers set industrial targets for enterprises, often out of touch with local conditions.
- system became increasingly complex and inefficient as the number of enterprises grew.
- too few administrators to manage the system effectively.
- Enterprises judged on fulfilling output targets, given bonuses accordingly.
- Exceeding targets led to higher targets the next year, discouraging managers from innovation and improvement.
Decentralization and Industrial Planning under Krushchev
Disincentives and Inefficiencies
- Output targets usually assessed by weight, favoring heavy goods over lighter, possibly more desirable items.
- Inefficient resource use required increasing capital investment to maintain growth, leading to stagnation.
Decentralization and Industrial Planning under Krushchev
Sixth Five-Year Plan (1956)
- Launched with over-optimistic targets
- abandoned after two years.
- new 7 year plan announced 1959 w/ Supreme Economic Council supervising