4. Understand communication within project management Flashcards
4.1 Explain
the benefits to a project of a communication plan
Communication The process of exchanging information and confirming there is shared understanding.
Communication plan A document that identifies what information is to be communicated to whom, why, when, where, how, through which medium and the desired impact.
Communication planning The establishment of project stakeholders’ communication and information needs.
4.2 Explain
the relationship between stakeholder analysis and an effective communication management plan
Stakeholder - Individuals or groups who have an interest or role in the project, programme or portfolio, or are impacted by it.
Stakeholder analysis - The identification of stakeholder groups, their interest levels and ability to influence the project or programme.
Stakeholder grid - A matrix used as part of a stakeholder analysis to identify the relative importance of stakeholders to a project; for example, by considering their relative power and influence.
Stakeholder identification - The process of identifying stakeholders in a project.
Communication Plan:
Stakeholder engagement
The systematic identification, analysis, planning and implementation of actions designed to influence stakeholders.
Communication - The process of exchanging information and confirming there is shared understanding.
Communication plan - A document that identifies what information is to be communicated to whom, why, when, where, how, through which medium and the desired impact.
Communication planning - The establishment of project stakeholders’ communication and information needs.
Do stakeholder analysis first to inform approaches in CP.
4.3 State
factors which can positively or negatively affect communications
4.4 State
sources of conflicts within a project
———
Conflict resolution The process of identifying and addressing differences that if left unmanaged would affect successful completion of objectives.
———
Conflict “Different objectives and attitudes between two or more parties.”
Conflict resolution “Process of identifying and addressing differences that if left unresolved could affect objectives.”
Arises where stakeholders:
- differing opinions
- different objectives
- different expectations
- different outcomes
- different motivations
- opposing interests and influence
Associated with:
- task/activity
- process to perform task
- relationships
Not necessarily bad:
- Creates debate and discussion
- Demonstrates true feelings
- Allows direction to be sought
Project lifecycle touch points:
Concept
- business need
- business case approval
- stakeholder influence
Definition
- priority of requirements
- PMP approval
Deployment
- resource availability
- resource commitment
- plans, processes, methods
- agreeing deadlines
- agreeing completion
- over spending
Transition
- failure to agree acceptance
- lack of confirmation of final closure
Adoption
- output not adopted by BAU
Benefits realisation
- disagreements over benefits measurement and realisation
4.5 Explain
ways in which conflict can be addressed (such as Thomas Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument
———
———
Conflict resolution perspective - opportunity to add value - everybody can win
Extent to which resolving conflict matters to achieving objectives and benefits - and building/preserving relationships - win-win = understanding and creatively aligning goals
Assertiveness skills - stand up for project
Listening skills - understand perspectives
Personal resilience - context highly charged and many conflicts
Desire to meet personal needs/objectives - vertical low to high
Desire to meet the needs/objectives of others - horizontal low to high
Compete (top left)
Avoid (bottom left)
Compromise (middle)
Collaborate (top right)
Accommodate (bottom right)
Compete (top left)
- I right - you wrong
- Combative
- One party asserts
- Win-lose
- Power play/rivalry
- Forced submission
Use:
- Decisive action - Emergency
- Important unpopular actions
- Org welfare - right/wrong
Avoid (bottom left)
- After you - no after you
- One party withdraws
- Ignore and go away
- Problems on hold
- Use of secrecy to avoid confrontation
- Slow procedures
- Evade demonstration of disagreement
- Use bureaucratic rules
Uses:
- Trivial issues
- Disruption outweighs benefits of resolution
- Cool down after intense conflict
- Others resolve more effectively
Compromise (middle)
- Split the difference
- Each party gives up something
- No-one wins, no-one loses
- Look for trade offs/deals
- Find acceptable solutions
Uses:
- Negotiation to reach agreement
- Goals important but more disruptive / not worth effort to pursue
- Equal power - mutually exclusive goals
- Temp settlements to complex issues
- Time pressure
- Back up to collaboration
Collaborate (top right)
- Lets work together
- Both satisfy goals
- No detriment to other party
- Problem solving
- Confronting differences
- Sharing ideas
- Both gain - win-win - requires high level facilitation skills
Use:
- Integrative solution important
- Concerns can’t be compromised
- Merge insights
- incorporate concerns into consensus
- Build strong relationships
Accommodate (bottom right)
- You are right, I am wrong
- Appeasement
- Give way
- Compliance
- Submission
- Put others concerns first
- Maintain relationships
Uses:
- Better position to be heard
- Learn and show reasonableness
- Others issues more impt than own
- Maintain co-operation
- Harmony and stability impt
- Others learn to develop from mistakes
4.6 Explain
how to plan and conduct negotiations (including ZOPA, BATNA, and ‘win-win’)
———
———
Negotiation “Discussion between two or more parties aimed at reaching agreement.”
Planning
- preparation time and effort = likelihood of desirable outcome
- define objectives
- criteria for what want to achieve
- understanding of best alternative to a negotiated agreement (BATNA)
- consideration of influence of other parties objectives
- identify variables and their limits - elements which can be adjusted to make concessions
- variables provide bargaining framework
Understand price rational to pay for service offered (not ‘value-based’, what paid before)
Note where negotiation has implications for wider orgn (programme/portfolio) and reflect in bargaining framework
Most Favourable Positions
MFP - each parties initial preferred position - buyer / seller
Both parties need to acknowledge degree of possible movement for negotiation to take place
MFP to BATNA = degree of possible movement
Zone of possible agreement ZOPA = positions of respective BATNAs
Final agreement anywhere in ZOPA
- relationship between parties developed
- levels of trust resulting
Create collaborative ‘win-win’ with competitive price, not competitive ‘win-lose’
Win-lose = poor ongoing relationship
Collaborative - communication skills (face to face), problem solving, strong trusting relationship, resilience, respect, build trust
Price of service balanced with understanding of value provided by supplier
Good background knowledge of respective positions
- why negotiating
- important outcome factors
- likely concessions - cost? value ascribed?
- revealing client time constraints can imbalance negotiations in favour of seller
Concessions
- cost of concession - low, medium, high
- value of concession - low, medium, hight
- trade concessions
- give low-cost low-value concessions first
- never give away high-cost low-value - too high an impact on final deal
Concession The acceptance of something that is not within specified requirements.
Follow up
- Vital
- Progress actions
- Documentation of agreed deal
- Minimises potential future conflict
- Legal entities negotiation will require commercial contract
- PM recognise limitations of authority and experience
- PM get support from procurement and legal specialists
- defendable in law
- best value for investing orgn