4: Running a Partnership Flashcards
What meant by ‘joint and severally liability’?
Joint liability means that anyone seeking to bring a claim against a partnership can choose to sue any one or all of the people who were partners when the liability was incurred.
How much of the claim can each partner be sued for?
The full amount of the claim.
Which section is joint liability found in PA 1890?
s9 PA 1890.
If one partner pays a claim, what are they able to claim from the other partners?
They can either be indemnified (reimbursed) by the other partners (unless the partnership agreement provides otherwise)
OR
They can claim a contribution from the other partners under s1(1) Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978.
What are the 3 exceptions to the rule that partners who have left the firm remain liable for obligations incurred whilst they were partners?
- if the departing partner did not give proper notice that they had left;
- under a novation agreement; or
- “holding out”.
What is the law of agency?
When a partner is bound by the acts of another person depending on whether that other person had the partners’ authority to act on their behalf.
Can a person acting on behalf of the firm who is authorised to do so (whether partner or not) bind the firm?
Yes, they can - and it will also bind all the partners. s6 PA 1890
What is the legal relationship between a partner who makes an agreement with a supplier?
Privity of contract
What is the legal relationship between a partner who makes an agreement and the other partners?
Authority
What is the person acting, in terms of authority, known as?
The agent
What is the person on who’s behalf the agent is acting, in terms of authority, known as?
The principal
What is actual authority?
Authority which has expressly been given by the principal to the agent.
What are two ways in which an actual authority can be granted?
Via the partnership agreement itself or by a decision of the other partners.
Can express actual authority be implied from a course of dealing?
Yes, it can.
What is apparent authority also known as?
Also known as ostensible authority
What is apparent authority?
Apparent authority depends on the point of view of the other party to the contract: based on what the principals (the other partners) have allowed the other party to think, are they entitled to believe that the agent (the individual partner) has authority?
What is the rule in s5 PA 1890 around apparent authority?
In order for a partner to have apparent authority, they must be doing an act which is in the course of business of the kind carried on by the firm.
What are the two main elements of s5 PA 1890?
- Business of the kind carried on by the firm (e.g. is a supplier entitled to believe that this is a normal course of action for the business?)
- Carried on in the usual way (e.g. would a supplier expect that the partner is able to place such a big order?)
Are the two tests in s5 PA 1890 subjective or objective?
They are both objective.
When will the partnership not be bound by apparent authority?
If:
- the transaction did not relate to the business of the kind carried on by the firm
- the partner would not usually have been expected to have the authority to do this
- the other party knew that the partner had no authority
- the other party did not know or did not believe that they were a partner in the firm
Is anyone bound if the tests in s5 PA 1890 are failed?
Yes, the partner is bound by privity of contract, but no one else is.
What does s8 PA 1890 reinforce?
That other partners will not be bound if the outsider knows that the individual partner’s authority is restricted.
What happens if the individual partner does not have any sort of actual authority but does have apparent authority?
The individual partner is bound by the contract due to privity of contract, but so are the other partners. However, those other partners can bring a claim agains the individual partner for exceeding their authority.
What happens if the individual partner does not have any sort of authority, either actual or apparent?
The individual partner would still be bound by the contract due to privity of contract, but the other partners would not be bound. The outside party could bring a claim against the individual partner for ‘breach of warranty of authority’ (provided they falsely held themselves out as having authority).
Are partners who have been admitted as a partner recently become liable to the creditors of the firm for things done before he become a partner?
No, s17(1) confirms that they will not be liable.
Is a retiring partner still liable for the debts of the partnership before their reitrement?
Yes, s17(2) states that a retiring partner is still liable of the debts that were incurred during his tenure in the partnership.